- 4,324
- 12
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2008
I have been thinking the same thing recently. But thats what people have been doing long before us. Back in the days before Christ there were people who wanted more of a answer than God or they wanted independence from God. But what makes me sour is even when we give them proof from our beliefs its still not good enoughOriginally Posted by RKO2004
But see thats why I mentioned in another thread that being an atheist is a religion because even though the so called truth is right in front of you, it requires a level of beliefs and faith because everything that glitters aint gold.Originally Posted by ericberry14
its much more likely for religion to be proven to be inaccurate than it is for science to be proven to be inaccurateOriginally Posted by RKO2004
Its cool guys. I'm sure He really wanted to know our opinions on the matter. I was hoping He would tell me what He thought about what I found.
And wait a minute. Why do people take science as literal? I mean really. How can we actually be sure that the earth has been around for millions of years? What if its wrong? What if the tools science uses to prove itself isn't as accurate as some want to believe?
Not believing is still believing in something.
IMO Science is nothin more than a ploy to discredit religion. The same science discredited Africa from bein the continent that has the longest history of civilization. Those that don't believe in a religion believe in the "religion" of science.
what proof from your beliefs do you speak of