Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
Save that Iverson-Nash crap for the other threads.
Can't.
JA, read this VERY SLOWLY.
I AM NOT MAKING THE POINT ABOUT THE NON WINNING WHEN COMPARING THEM. BUY A CLUE.
So save your Jeff Hornacek's and Karl Malone's.
The point is,
AI is overhyped to the max.
Steve Nash is overhyped to the max.
You like one, but not the other. But they areBOTH overhyped. That is weird to me.
Very easy to see why I would get tired of both of them, they are BOTH overhyped.
But for you, you buy the hype on Steve, and dismiss the hype on Allen. That is strange. And seems rather selective. Kinda like, maybe you accept the hype onSteve, cuz I dunno, he used to play for your team.
I wonder if Allen played for the Mavs, and Steve didn't, I think you would switch your tunes. Of course you'll deny this, but those of us who know youthru here, know damn well I'm right. Once Mav, always a Mav.
You'll notice I could care less about either of them. Neither has ever hurt me, or my teams. And to add another player to these two, please throw in RonArtest. Another player that is overhyped to the max. I don't like him either. And he's on my team. Still don't like him.
Ron Artest never won anything either. Funny how all this praise gets heaped on these 3 dudes who never won, and they all have completely different styles andgames. It's like they get praise just cuz. Or maybe to piss me off, I dunno.