- 252
- 10
Originally Posted by hoosiers4life
Spurs ArsenalOriginally Posted by GMA 11
Originally Posted by hoosiers4life
Originally Posted by nesto0o0o
I guess it dont doesn't matter what any Scum fan thinks.
Fact: Spurs won and were the better and got the 3 points THATS what matters
Yid Army
You are correct, T=that is what matters. But if you think Spurs were the better team you are confused. For the rest of the first half after they scored I thought we were playing a relegation challenger. Then when RVP came in he was a class above everyone on that field, except Gomes.
@ spurs v arsenal arguments ..in the end they are always pointless.
..but i dont get how you can't admit spurs were the better side. even your own manager admitted this for once.
some fans act as if defending isn't part of a performance. Gomes barely had to do anything until the last 15 minutes
Shots(on goal): 15(5) 23(6)
Time of Possesion: 34% 67% (I realize this doesn't add up to 100. I got it from Soccernet.)
Saves: 5 3
I really don't know how you could have watched the game and think that Spurs outplayed Arsenal. Its like saying that Arsenal played just as good as Barcelona in the first leg of their Champions League matchup. The match ended 2-2, but one team played comprehensively better than the other but were kept out by several great saves from the other's goalkeeper. Oh, wait, do I need to explain what the Champions League is since Spurs have never participated?
You could make the same argument that Almunia had little to do for the last 40 minutes. Both Spurs goals were well played. One was pretty lucky, once in a career lucky. The other one was well played and they took it to the weak point in Arsenal's defence. Aside from that I don't remember a difficult save for Almunia to make.
your petty argument means nothing... SPURS WON THE GAME GET OVER IT