- 12,102
- 1,410
Cleveland State does play D, better than I thought....29th in the country.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by RocDaMike11
Maryland better get out and defend the 3 pt. line. Cal leads the nation in 3 point FG %.Originally Posted by MDterps4
Anybody got the goods on Cal? I honestly haven't seen them play all year so I have no clue what the Terps are getting into. I looked at their results this season, and Washington and Utah were their best wins. Judging solely on who they've beat/lost, I think we got this.
And as Allen said, Randle and Pat Christopher can play.
Originally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm
Laugh all you want. It's going to happen.Originally Posted by YngSeanCombs12
Originally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm
Utah St. > Marquette
Gonzaga > UNC
Siena > OSU
How in the world does the sorry Big Ten get 7 teams in? That conference sucks...
UNC beat Michigan State 98-63 earlier this year...
I mean, it's whatever... So long as the end game is the same...Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
Originally Posted by DLo13
That'd do just fine...That's too quick and painless.
YngSeanCombs12 wrote:
How in the world does the sorry Big Ten get 7 teams in? That conference sucks...
How about doing some research before you make statements as foolish as that one..
Originally Posted by MDterps4
Originally Posted by RocDaMike11
Maryland better get out and defend the 3 pt. line. Cal leads the nation in 3 point FG %.Originally Posted by MDterps4
Anybody got the goods on Cal? I honestly haven't seen them play all year so I have no clue what the Terps are getting into. I looked at their results this season, and Washington and Utah were their best wins. Judging solely on who they've beat/lost, I think we got this.
And as Allen said, Randle and Pat Christopher can play.
Now I'm scared. If Gary has us in that stupid 3-2 match up zone for a majority of the game we will get lit up. I couldn't believe how many open threes NC State, Wake, and Duke had against that zone. I guess you gotta do what you gotta do when you've got no size.
went to every home game this year. they jack up 3s, randle has no qualms about the nba distance, inside presence is so-so, defense is bleh attimes, hopefully christopher or jorge can slow down that mexican(?) guard they have. whoever comes out of that matchup will probably be steamrolled by memphisOriginally Posted by MDterps4
Originally Posted by RocDaMike11
Maryland better get out and defend the 3 pt. line. Cal leads the nation in 3 point FG %.Originally Posted by MDterps4
Anybody got the goods on Cal? I honestly haven't seen them play all year so I have no clue what the Terps are getting into. I looked at their results this season, and Washington and Utah were their best wins. Judging solely on who they've beat/lost, I think we got this.
And as Allen said, Randle and Pat Christopher can play.
Now I'm scared. If Gary has us in that stupid 3-2 match up zone for a majority of the game we will get lit up. I couldn't believe how many open threes NC State, Wake, and Duke had against that zone. I guess you gotta do what you gotta do when you've got no size.
This looks like some sort of reaction to a Maury Povich paternity test. Sloan found out he was the father, and BJ celebrated...
Washington's a deep team with 9 players averaging at least 10 minutes a game. Very good guard play with Justin Dentmon, Isaiah Thomas, andVenoy Overton though they are all undersized. All three of them though can penetrate and get to the foul line well. Quincy Pondexter's a longer moreathletic wing who has really come into his own down the stretch of conference play. Very talented but can disappear at times. Jon Brockman is the mainpresence inside. Senior, finalist for the Wooden Award and averages a double double. Among the best rebounders in the country but is not that tall for a postplayer.Originally Posted by zzz1035
Can anyone drop some knowledge on washington or purdue. That matchup has me stuck right now.
Originally Posted by throwmonkey
Washington's a deep team with 9 players averaging at least 10 minutes a game. Very good guard play with Justin Dentmon, Isaiah Thomas, and Venoy Overton though they are all undersized. All three of them though can penetrate and get to the foul line well. Quincy Pondexter's a longer more athletic wing who has really come into his own down the stretch of conference play. Very talented but can disappear at times. Jon Brockman is the main presence inside. Senior, finalist for the Wooden Award and averages a double double. Among the best rebounders in the country but is not that tall for a post player.Originally Posted by zzz1035
Can anyone drop some knowledge on washington or purdue. That matchup has me stuck right now.
Keep laughing.Originally Posted by Gameover2
Originally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm
Laugh all you want. It's going to happen.Originally Posted by YngSeanCombs12
Originally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm
Utah St. > Marquette
Gonzaga > UNC
Siena > OSU
How in the world does the sorry Big Ten get 7 teams in? That conference sucks...
UNC beat Michigan State 98-63 earlier this year...
i'm thinking of picking north dakota st over kansas & i have purdue in the elite 8.Originally Posted by BallinBoykz
Does anybody else have almost all favorites this year? Im finding it hard to pick any upsets for the first two-three rounds...
Is this just me?
Originally Posted by D723
Memphis has been getting the shaft from *#++%@$ basketball analysts for the past 3-4 years going into the tournament. I know we don't have a ton of quality wins since Reke's been playing the 1, but I feel our defense alone can take us very deep.Originally Posted by archnoobie
You know what I mean or maybe you dont. We get overlooked as a potential threat to win it all. Its almost like, "Yeah they got a high seed, but they're not really good enough to win it all." It's really quite interesting. Either way. I'll take it.Originally Posted by Clutchshooter
they were the top overall seed in last years tourney and a #2 this year. that's not exactly under the radar..
Originally Posted by Clutchshooter
Originally Posted by D723
Memphis has been getting the shaft from *#++%@$ basketball analysts for the past 3-4 years going into the tournament. I know we don't have a ton of quality wins since Reke's been playing the 1, but I feel our defense alone can take us very deep.Originally Posted by archnoobie
You know what I mean or maybe you dont. We get overlooked as a potential threat to win it all. Its almost like, "Yeah they got a high seed, but they're not really good enough to win it all." It's really quite interesting. Either way. I'll take it.Originally Posted by Clutchshooter
they were the top overall seed in last years tourney and a #2 this year. that's not exactly under the radar..
and what do the analysts say? they've always said 'this is a talented squad but they cant win it all' and memphis's ZERO national championship shows they've been correct.
dont know why some of y'all act like you won the whole damn thing and people are denying props. the analysts have been exactly on point about this program.
last season was the best memphis team ever and they still couldnt get it done.
might have been different if they hadnt run up on the Mighty Jayhawks..