Los Angeles
formerly bright nikes
- 23,214
- 4,879
Man, my phone is acting mad wild. Whatever though
[h1]http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/dod...gers-plan-to-start-ramon-ortiz-on-friday.html[/h1]
[h1]http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/dod...gers-plan-to-start-ramon-ortiz-on-friday.html[/h1]
[h1]Now it's down to this: Dodgers plan to start Ramon Ortiz on Friday[/h1]
May 10, 2010 | 8:45pm
No further evidence is required. The Dodgers have continually reminded us how thin their starting pitching is.
Still, more reminders keep coming.
On the same day the Dodgers placed Charlie Haeger on the disabled list and recalled John Ely from triple-A Albuquerque and scheduled him to start Tuesday, Manager Joe Torre said Ramon Ortiz is likely to start Friday.
Please restrain your enthusiasm.
That would be the Ortiz still hanging around with his 1-1 record and 5.24 ERA in 16 relief appearances. And for that, your reward is a shot at the starting rotation.
Guess this time Torre was down to the O's.
Of course, he has precious little to choose from, what with the Dodgers trying out pitchers for both the fifth spot and the spot vacated by right-hander Vicente Padilla’s trip to the disabled list on a spot-by-spot basis.
The Dodgers have an off-day Thursday and could skip a starter.
"We're leaning toward giving Ortiz the ball on Friday and giving [Clayton] Kershaw and [Chad] Billingsley an extra day,’’ Torre said. "That's our plan right now -- Ortiz on Friday, Kershaw on Saturday and Billingsley on Sunday.’’
Unless he goes belly up, Ely is already penciled in as a regular member of the rotation. Ortiz is essentially another emergency tryout. He last started a game in the major leagues for the Twins in 2007.
Torre’s only other real candidate is Carlos Monasterios, the rookie who went four innings in his only start. Guess he didn’t impress.
--Steve Dilbeck
[h1]If Mariners become sellers, could Frank McCourt and the Dodgers pay the price for Cliff Lee?[/h1]
May 10, 2010 | 5:26pm
Could the Dodgers actually pass on Cliff Lee again?
Given the state of their starting pitching, maybe you’re wondering if that’s even a question.
Given that they failed to seriously purse him in the off-season when traded to the Seattle Mariners and their payroll has been in retreat since the McCourts’ divorce became public, maybe you wonder whether there’s even a chance.
This is all dependent upon Lee becoming available, but with the Mariners suffering a disappointing 12-19 start and already trailing the Texas Rangers by 9½ games in the American League West, they’re looking like a team that is going to become a seller.
Lee is making $9 million this year and will become a free agent at the end of the season. Before the Philadelphia Phillies traded him to Seattle, he indicated a desire to test the market this winter.
Lee, who went 4-0 for the Phillies in the postseason last year, only recently joined the Seattle rotation. In two starts, he’s 0-1 with a 2.40 earned-run average.
If the Mariners aren’t going to contend this season and aren’t interested in signing the 31-year-old to a long-term deal, he becomes a prime candidate for a midseason trade.
The Dodgers have been understandably reluctant to trade prospects for a "rental" player in the past. When the Phillies acquired Roy Halladay from Toronto as part of their three-team trade that sent Lee to Seattle, they signed him to a three-year extension at $60 million as part of the deal.
That might look good to Lee, but then so might C.C. Sabathia’s seven-year, $161-million deal with the Yankees. Sabathia is Lee’s former Cleveland teammate.
The Dodgers clearly need another starting pitcher, particularly an ace, and Frank McCourt could seriously use a positive public relations move to prove the divorce hasn’t handcuffed the team financially.
Despite the denials, however, all evidence suggests that it has. And Lee, who offered one of the first clues, might offer the last.
-- Steve Dilbeck