- 4,075
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
He's going to be our quarterback regardless. I'd rather have actual decent receivers that he's overthrowing.
Official 2012 San Francisco 49ers Offseason Thread
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by acidicality,
- Start date
- 4,075
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
He's going to be our quarterback regardless. I'd rather have actual decent receivers that he's overthrowing.
- 12,536
- 39
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
Yeah honestly as much as the majority of the Faithful wants Peyton, Jimmy likes Alex. That's all that should matter to us. Although, I like Morgan a lot. He was our consistent receiver until he got hurt. Crabtree just isn't going to cut it. Mike Wallace would be
- 12,536
- 39
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
Yeah honestly as much as the majority of the Faithful wants Peyton, Jimmy likes Alex. That's all that should matter to us. Although, I like Morgan a lot. He was our consistent receiver until he got hurt. Crabtree just isn't going to cut it. Mike Wallace would be
- 8,323
- 730
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
Wallace is an RFA with a 1st rd pick tender, I don't feel like SFO is gonna sign him.
- 8,323
- 730
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
Wallace is an RFA with a 1st rd pick tender, I don't feel like SFO is gonna sign him.
GreenNGold89
formerly bbllplaya23
- 6,573
- 2,117
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
If we give Alex anything more than 3 years...
GreenNGold89
formerly bbllplaya23
- 6,573
- 2,117
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
If we give Alex anything more than 3 years...
Los Angeles
formerly bright nikes
- 23,174
- 4,764
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2004
I want Vjax
Los Angeles
formerly bright nikes
- 23,174
- 4,764
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2004
I want Vjax
- 23,865
- 15,561
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
Wow didn't even know this was here. I say we keep Alex Smith and get Wallace also. I'm sure Alex learned a lot last season and we weren't too far off from the getting to the Superbowl so we don't really need drastic change, just improvements in certain areas and refinement in our sharpness as a whole.
- 23,865
- 15,561
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
Wow didn't even know this was here. I say we keep Alex Smith and get Wallace also. I'm sure Alex learned a lot last season and we weren't too far off from the getting to the Superbowl so we don't really need drastic change, just improvements in certain areas and refinement in our sharpness as a whole.
- 5,132
- 843
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2003
I know. I'm hoping somebody else overpays for him and forces the front office to go after manningOriginally Posted by bbllplaya23
If we give Alex anything more than 3 years...
- 5,132
- 843
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2003
I know. I'm hoping somebody else overpays for him and forces the front office to go after manningOriginally Posted by bbllplaya23
If we give Alex anything more than 3 years...
- 28,063
- 9,181
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
What you guys are failing to understand is that Mike Wallace wouldnt be Mike Wallace with Alex throwing him the ball. Part of what makes Wallace so good was Ben Roethlisberger extending plays which allowed Wallace's speed to wreak havoc on the defense. When Ben extends plays, he constantly has his eyes downfield in search of his receivers breaking free. When Alex extends plays, he either puts his head down and runs, or focuses his eyes on his checkdowns.
So we could waste our first rounder and a big salary on Mike Wallace. But we wouldnt be getting the Mike Wallace everyone is used to seeing due to our inadequacies at the quarterback position.
So we could waste our first rounder and a big salary on Mike Wallace. But we wouldnt be getting the Mike Wallace everyone is used to seeing due to our inadequacies at the quarterback position.
- 28,063
- 9,181
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
What you guys are failing to understand is that Mike Wallace wouldnt be Mike Wallace with Alex throwing him the ball. Part of what makes Wallace so good was Ben Roethlisberger extending plays which allowed Wallace's speed to wreak havoc on the defense. When Ben extends plays, he constantly has his eyes downfield in search of his receivers breaking free. When Alex extends plays, he either puts his head down and runs, or focuses his eyes on his checkdowns.
So we could waste our first rounder and a big salary on Mike Wallace. But we wouldnt be getting the Mike Wallace everyone is used to seeing due to our inadequacies at the quarterback position.
So we could waste our first rounder and a big salary on Mike Wallace. But we wouldnt be getting the Mike Wallace everyone is used to seeing due to our inadequacies at the quarterback position.
- 4,075
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
I don't care.
I don't want to see the Kyle Williams, Zieglers, and Brent Swains lining up at WR anymore. Throwing it 40 yards to Wallace x3 a game would be enough.
(Good point though).
I don't want to see the Kyle Williams, Zieglers, and Brent Swains lining up at WR anymore. Throwing it 40 yards to Wallace x3 a game would be enough.
(Good point though).
- 4,075
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
I don't care.
I don't want to see the Kyle Williams, Zieglers, and Brent Swains lining up at WR anymore. Throwing it 40 yards to Wallace x3 a game would be enough.
(Good point though).
I don't want to see the Kyle Williams, Zieglers, and Brent Swains lining up at WR anymore. Throwing it 40 yards to Wallace x3 a game would be enough.
(Good point though).
- 10,857
- 67
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
having manning can also help smith improve. teach him a few tricks
- 10,857
- 67
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
having manning can also help smith improve. teach him a few tricks
- 28,063
- 9,181
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
Fixed
- 28,063
- 9,181
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
Fixed
GreenNGold89
formerly bbllplaya23
- 6,573
- 2,117
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
We ain't bringing in Manning and signing Smith.
It seems pretty clear than we aren't going to make a run at Manning which is really disappointing to me. Mike Wallace or VJax would be
