aepps20
Supporter
- Feb 8, 2004
- 42,822
- 91,280
Spence just seems to get better with each fight.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think we know why, but still impressive nonethelessSpence just seems to get better with each fight.
???I think we know why, but still impressive nonetheless
I think we know why, but still impressive nonetheless
He is clearly juiced to the gills and on top of that has some way of cutting tons of weight then rehydrating. That and being in his prime makes him very dangerous. The way he's looking now, it would be man down for nearly every welterweight in history. I'm not being a hater I do enjoy his fights, but I am calling it the way it is.
I like Thurman, but he knows that strap is on borrowed time.
I don’t necessarily think he’s ducking, I just think he wishes he had enough time like Garcia to hold that strap hostage.
Juiced to the gills based on what though? He looks like he has a little gyno going on but there's plenty of folks that have that without being on roids. No bacne that I can see. No huge traps. No huge weight gain from his olympic days. As a matter of fact he's been a welterweight since he was a teenager in his golden gloves days, makes sense he would be a big welterweight now. Cuts just as much weight as Brook, Thurman and Porter, they all claim to be walking around at 168 or more. Just curious why you think he particularly is on them, besides of course the power
And let's be clear, I wouldn't be slightly surprised that ANY boxer was on them, as a matter of fact I'm sure alot of them are using something to get an edge. But I'm still curious why you think it's clear that he is
His punches have a unique thud that do not sound normal.
There are different kinds of PED's, not all add size or muscle. The side effects can vary from person to person. There are some improvements to his physique over the years, but that can be the progression from being a young man to a grown man. However, I have serious doubts that what we are seeing from Spence is all natural. It has more to do with the way he's fighting and his power. His punches have a unique thud that do not sound normal. In the Kell Brook fight, he was willing to eat five or so punches to get one in. It's usually not a good idea to do that, unless he knows he has a decided advantage. Spence knew it was only a matter of time, as if he was chopping down a tree. The boxer that first comes to mind who had this kind of approach was prime Margarito. Go figure.
I am not picking on just Spence. Matter of fact, I am just as certain that his opponent on Saturday was taking something he wasn't supposed to even though he was caught before. Someone brought up that Spence appears to be getting better in each fight. So whatever he is doing or ingesting is highly effective. I don't want to make it seem that I think all of Spence's success is attributed to PED's. That is certainly not the case, there has to be hard work behind the scenes.
Floyd was definitely on. There is definitive evidence out there proving that.
Jarrett Hurd is the Black Margarito
Testosterone and epitestosterone are naturally occurring hormones. Testosterone is performance enhancing. Epitestosterone is not.
A normal testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio is slightly more than 1-to-1. Conte says that one recent study of the general population “placed the average T-E ratio for whites at 1.2-to-1 and for blacks at 1.3-to-1.”
Under WADA standards, a testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio of up to 4-to-1 is acceptable. That allows for any reasonable variation in an athlete’s natural testosterone level (which, for an elite athlete, might be particularly high). If the ratio is above 4-to-1, an athlete is presumed to be doping.
Some athletes who use exogenous testosterone game the system by administering exogenous epitestosterone to drive their testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio down beneath the permitted ceiling. This can be done by injection or by the application of epitestosterone as a cream. In the absence of a CIR test, this masks the use of synthetic testosterone.
But there’s a catch. If an athlete tries to manipulate his or her testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio, it is difficult to balance the outcome. If an athlete uses too much epitestosterone - and the precise amount is difficult to calibrate - the result can be an abnormally low T-E ratio.
“In and of itself,” Conte explains, “an abnormally low T-E ratio is not proof of doping. The ratio can vary for the same athlete from test to test. But an abnormally low T-E ratio is a red flag. And if you’re serious about the testing, the next thing you do [after a low T-E ratio test result] is administer a CIR test on the same sample.”
Earlier this year, in response to a request for documents, the Nevada State Athletic Commission produced two lab reports listing the testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio on tests that it (not USADA) had overseen on Floyd Mayweather. In one instance, blood and urine samples were taken from Mayweather on Aug. 18, 2011 (prior to his Sept. 17 fight against Victor Ortiz). In the other instance, blood and urine samples were taken from Mayweather on April 3, 2013 (prior to his May 4 fight against Robert Guerrero).
Mayweather’s testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio for the April 3, 2013, sample was 0.80. His testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio for the Aug. 18, 2011, sample was 0.69.
https://www.sbnation.com/longform/2015/9/9/9271811/can-boxing-trust-usada
The main question is simple: Why is the T/E ratio for Jon Jones seemingly so low?
I wouldn't pay much attention to it. T/E ratios -- the mean, the average -- is around 1.0, but that means there's going to be lots of cases greater than 1. If it's more than 14 or 15, you start worrying about them using testosterone, but if it's less than 1, you don't worry about them taking testosterone. That's not the answer.
He could be taking epistestosterone. That would give a low ratio, but to find that out, you've got to know what you're doing in the testing and I don't think the people doing the testing really understand what's going on.
Jones was screened via urinalysis. Is there a difference in the reliability of results when the test is conducted via urinalysis as opposed to blood testing?
Well, blood test is always better, but you don't have a blood test. You've only got a urine test. You don't have a T/E ratio in a blood test. In the blood test all you get is the amount, the concentration, of testosterone. It's fairly unusual for that to be out of whack.
But it could be and that would be a sign that is something is wrong. Here you've got a low T/E ratio. Where you get a low T/E ratio is to take epitestosterone.
Are there natural explanations for why it could be that low?
Yeah, the normal range is from around .1 up to 4, so you can be that low and have absolutely nothing wrong.
blackcease , nah I didn't mean that as an insult. I like Hurd too. lil Charlo was struggling with the likes John Jackson before catching him. He's got a chance with his chin and power.