- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,804
- 30,199
Pat Fitzgerald to Green Bay...?
This is weird...and interesting. I like Fitz a lot as a coach. No clue how it would work out for him in the NFL. I lean optimistic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pat Fitzgerald to Green Bay...?
they really should. Its wrong. Or, I'm still a believer in coaches needing to sit out a year if they leave after signing day. This whole you're committing to the university is crap. These guys really develop a relationship with these coaches throughout the recruiting process. Sounds cheesy to say, but to some of these kids, these coaches have become a father figure to them1 negative to early signing. I’m curious if they’ll let kids out of their contract if they want to go (any school with the same situation)? Probably not, but ... crappy deal for the youngins
yeah, I wouldn't. Go concentrate on someone from the midwestIf Cristobal leaves, Oregon isn’t hiring another FL coach lol. That what big a swift kick in the crank 2 years in a row.
same here. LOVE HIM but just seems weird he;ll be in GB. Like, if I'm Rodgers, am I pumped for Fitz like that?This is weird...and interesting. I like Fitz a lot as a coach. No clue how it would work out for him in the NFL. I lean optimistic.
same here. LOVE HIM but just seems weird he;ll be in GB. Like, if I'm Rodgers, am I pumped for Fitz like that?
they really should. Its wrong. Or, I'm still a believer in coaches needing to sit out a year if they leave after signing day. This whole you're committing to the university is crap. These guys really develop a relationship with these coaches throughout the recruiting process. Sounds cheesy to say, but to some of these kids, these coaches have become a father figure to them
they really should. Its wrong. Or, I'm still a believer in coaches needing to sit out a year if they leave after signing day. This whole you're committing to the university is crap. These guys really develop a relationship with these coaches throughout the recruiting process. Sounds cheesy to say, but to some of these kids, these coaches have become a father figure to them
I think it's clear it's a combination of the 4 best records, the 4 most deserving, and the 4 most impressive throughout the year.
Georgia had 2 losses, lost to one of the other playoff teams and LSU by 20+. They weren't 4 most deserving, 4 best records, and honestly not one of the 4 most impressive. UGA fans need to give it up. ND, UCF, and even Ohio State were more deserving and had better records. SEC teams need to stop expecting to be rewarded just for losing to SEC teams.
Cristobol or Holgorsen
No one's done it yet though right? Like there's no precedent for letting kids out these first 2 years?
They weren't 'deserving' by the criteria but it was clear they were a top 4 team. Stop with your SEC hate.
of course. But, they could however let kids get out of LOI if the coach leaves after signing dayYou’d never be able to enforce that.
How was it clear they were a top 4 team?
In 12 games they played 3 G5’s/FCS’s and basically 8 home games. Played 5 ranked teams all year and went 2-3 in those games with one being a 20 point murdering to an ok LSU team.
I’m not even hating on UGA I’m saying objectively by any criteria of measurement ND deserved to be there more than them. What criteria tells you they’re a top 4 team? Your eye test?
Yes the eye test. I literally said they weren't deserving based on the criteria of the committee.
They lost to LSU by 20 points. We're rewarding them for keeping it close with Bama?Yes the eye test. I literally said they weren't deserving based on the criteria of the committee.
They lost to LSU by 20 points. We're rewarding them for keeping it close with Bama?
Question. Why is @LowLifeMac viewing threads but not commenting? Dipped ever since UGA lost to Bama. Pride can't really be that hurt, can it? Its just sports.
no, i'm serious. Its odd. Nobody is waiting for him to come back so they can talk ****. Lurking is weird.Stop being a bully
No I'm rewarding them for being the #2 team in combined offensive and defensive efficiency over the season despite that 20 point loss to LSU. I hate UGA but calling a spade a spade. Bama also wouldn't have fit the criteria had they lost the SEC championship but anybody with two working eyes knows they're a top 4 team in the country.
Lol Bama would have had 1 loss following the SECCG but an undefeated regular season where they destroyed every team they played by 3+ TDs. They would have still had an arguably more impressive resume than ND who didn’t have to play a CG and struggled in a few of their games.
Are you really trying to compare Georgia’s season performance and “eye test” to Bama?
Stop.
ed reed & ray probably pushing for that nobody is here for itRex Ryan?