- 71,329
- 113,702
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
Kennard was a much better COLLEGE player than Mitchell. Mitchell had the edge in strength and athleticism though. Most big boards at the time had them on the same tier.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
This is the face of a man with deep regrets
![]()
If KP is active they may not win another game![]()
![]()
This is why you need to go the @wavydaddy route and keep the pantry under lock and key.
This is the face of a man with deep regrets
![]()
If KP is active they may not win another game![]()
![]()
Games are not measured the same. They're taken on a case by case, team by team. Game 1s are not must wins for every team. Teams that are better, can drop games. And win. There's too much history to prove it. Depending on the team, every game isn't a must win, but for some teams, special things need to happen. And certain games have to be won to try and manage a mental edge and apply some pressure. For other teams, doesn't matter. Talent can overload.freeze While you are here.
Can you now explain to me why calling ANY playoff game, "A must win" isn't the dumbest most #MagicJohnsonTweet- ish statement one could possibly make about a playoff game?
Games are not measured the same. They're taken on a case by case, team by team. Game 1s are not must wins for every team. Teams that are better, can drop games. And win. There's too much history to prove it.
Every game is not a MUST win. You're thinking too small. People that don't hoop typically view games on a basic level![]()
How many games are needed to win an NBA Championship?
I also think you fail to realize the MAIN reason games as labeled must win is to attract more viewers to tune in.Games are not measured the same. They're taken on a case by case, team by team. Game 1s are not must wins for every team. Teams that are better, can drop games. And win. There's too much history to prove it.
Every game is not a MUST win. You're thinking too small. People that don't hoop typically view games on a basic level![]()
Injuries could be catching up to him - the shoulder one is by far the most problematic.
How many games must a team WIN to become the NBA Champ?Trick question. It can be as few as 16 or as many as 28. Unless you meant wins.
However many it takes.How many games are needed to win an NBA Championship?
Before I form my next thought, give me some context. Remind of what we were saying. I remember you said you'd come back to it, but I forget what I said.I also think you fail to realize the MAIN reason games as labeled must win is to attract more viewers to tune in.
Take it the same way Vince McMahon tells his announce teams to call an event the "Biggest Ever."
It is more marketing than anything.
So regardless of how many games it takes, a team "must win" 16 games to be considered the Champ.However many it takes.
16 wins...might take 28 games to win 16 times.
This low-key a must win for Portland imo
Lakers been playing booty. They may go off and then they're up 2. Gotta focus Portland.
Nothing low-ki about it.
Every playoff game is a must-win.
Nah.So regardless of how many games it takes, a team "must win" 16 games to be considered the Champ.
Not 1
Not 2
Not 3
But 16.
So to call ANY of those games "Must Win" after it has already been established that it takes 16 games to win it all, is redundant and is done for Promotional Purposes only.
Now, I get the idea that some games feel more important than other due to continuing/breaking momentum as well as securing/avoiding elimination but every single WIN is needed to reach 16.
You definitely have never worked in a TV studio.Nah.
Every single game isn't must win. Depends on the team. It's not about billing our ratings. It's about power ranking, momentum and eliminations.
For sure. I definitely believe game 1 was a must win. I think underdogs have to try and steal games on the road. And game 1s are usually the one to take before the better team adjusts. For games where momentum swings or when a deeper hole can be dug.This was what I said we would come back to.
Ok...You definitely have never worked in a TV studio.
I think some games might have a little more weight compared to others in certain scenarios(down 2-0 with game 3 & 4 at their house, overcoming a 5th game down 3-2 can be a momentum shifter, a game 1 can be a "tone-setter" for underdogs(or even teams near "even", etc.) When I played in high school, I admit that if another PG did well against me the last game, it had a chance to effect my psyche(negatively or positively) so intangibles like momentum, setting the tone, figuring out your opponent mentally, confidence boosters can definitely swing series/games.So regardless of how many games it takes, a team "must win" 16 games to be considered the Champ.
Not 1
Not 2
Not 3
But 16.
So to call ANY of those games "Must Win" after it has already been established that it takes 16 games to win it all, is redundant and is done for Promotional Purposes only.
Now, I get the idea that some games feel more important than other due to continuing/breaking momentum as well as securing/avoiding elimination but every single WIN is needed to reach 16.
What will people be allowed to say about COnley if 2 of his next 3 games are sub-par?**** everyone who thought conley was washed and don’t watch Jazz games to know he was getting back on track
That they were sub parWhat will people be allowed to say about COnley if 2 of his next 3 games are sub-par?