- 5,275
- 4,058
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2015
You already know....and then it will be the camo 1s (and hopefully by xmas we will get another OG colorway we all can agree on)I bet this happens with the quai 54s [emoji]128514[/emoji]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You already know....and then it will be the camo 1s (and hopefully by xmas we will get another OG colorway we all can agree on)I bet this happens with the quai 54s [emoji]128514[/emoji]
maybe he thinks theyre not worth retail cause theyre meh, but would cop and they would be worth it under retail. plenty of people do that. nothing wrong wit that tho.Yea you said that about 100 million times in hereSails are still meh.
But you also said you might get them for under retail so do you like to buy shoes you think they're "meh"? [emoji]129300[/emoji]
maybe he thinks theyre not worth retail cause theyre meh, but would cop and they would be worth it under retail. plenty of people do that. nothing wrong wit that tho.
FaxSuch a sensitive thread
Sails are still meh.
FixedFax B
nah thats by YOUR logic. you dont know what my price range is and u dont know the other guy's too. nobody named any numbers. youre pulling those out your behind, aka talking from out your behind.So by your logic:maybe he thinks theyre not worth retail cause theyre meh, but would cop and they would be worth it under retail. plenty of people do that. nothing wrong wit that tho.
$160 - meh
$100 - looks good
$60 - must cop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Me personally I wouldnt pay $20 for a shoe unless I liked them and plan on wearing them
Pretty sure that's some great logic right thereSo by your logic:
$160 - meh
$100 - looks good
$60 - must cop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Me personally I wouldnt pay $20 for a shoe unless I liked them and plan on wearing them
Good looks my guy lolFixed
It actually is great logic. There are a lot of shoes I'm indifferent towards because I don't wanna spend retail on them but if they can be had for real cheap I may find them more enticingPretty sure that's some great logic right there
exactly. people been doing that for the longest. and it doesnt just apply to shoes. its nothing new. i dont get why people get offended or look down on others for it. mind boggling.Good looks my guy lolFixedIt actually is great logic. There are a lot of shoes I'm indifferent towards because I don't wanna spend retail on them but if they can be had for real cheap I may find them more enticingPretty sure that's some great logic right there
you going to rock both at the same time for the culture?
Mail call
you going to rock both at the same time for the culture?
Mail call
Some dudes is soft bexactly. people been doing that for the longest. and it doesnt just apply to shoes. its nothing new. i dont get why people get offended or look down on others for it. mind boggling.
hardly anyones said that the sails are trash or garbage tho. That's when no price that makes them appealing. There's plenty of shoes I think are decent or meh but wouldn't consider them at retail price.My point is that some of you think that a shoe starts to look good because of a price drop? That's logical....
OK any one who has thé sails can WE see some pictures? so far havent seen none with a décent fit to say i was wrong they do look good .but i still say not worth all da hype there plain ...
@ATDizzle said it best. Never said that there's no way I'd cop. Passing, yes. I've received kicks I didn't care for in a multi-shoe trade transaction only to sell them off or trade them away.maybe he thinks theyre not worth retail cause theyre meh, but would cop and they would be worth it under retail. plenty of people do that. nothing wrong wit that tho.Yea you said that about 100 million times in hereSails are still meh.
But you also said you might get them for under retail so do you like to buy shoes you think they're "meh"? [emoji]129300[/emoji]
this is a pure sneakerhead economics....and of course works in reverse too and honestly would find it hard to meet a sneakerhead that doesn't have a version of this working on some level. Most recently I've used this logic on ASG 1s - felt at $175 (retail) it was meh but as the pricepoint went down my opinion on them rose. Likewise felt the $550 aftermarket price of gym reds made them 'meh' (couldn't justify a retro+ colorway in a non-OG cut) to me but upon finding them in a more amendable pricepoint saw my opinion rise on them and cop without hesitation.So by your logic:
$160 - meh
$100 - looks good
$60 - must cop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Me personally I wouldnt pay $20 for a shoe unless I liked them and plan on wearing them
Thanks hope to see them soon but you right WE all need à plain pair of shoes either all black or white even sail ... But what your guys opions on thèse any one copping ?not m'y pic for thé record
I guess my "neutral" ones would be the 2016 BHM, and the leather on those is excellent imo. I don't have any all black or all white (personally don't care for white sneakers), but find it funny to see this sails discussion getting so heated. If you like em, cop em, otherwise move on...Every sneakerhead needs a pair of neutral shoes and the sails are it!! Yes they are plain but the leather quality makes them a joy to rock. I can show you some pics of my sails but I havent had a chance to rock them yet, so I have no "fit" pictures. They're super easy to add to any outfit though.
Where did you get AM1s for 88 bucks? Those are the only Pinnacles I want, much rather have them over the AJ1sI know this is the AJ1 thread and all but I just won a different kind of Sails. Air Max 1 Pinnacle Sails for 88 bucks! Super excited. Hopefully this quenches my thrist for the highs because I been so tempted to get them but at a lower price. I cant sacrifice 350-375 bucks at the moment to get both Triple Blacks and Sails. Definitely will get both down the line. I think I like the lowtop silhouette better for solid colored shoes though.