- 13,453
- 11,974
Dude the materials aren’t 2nd to none period.ill let u go back and forth but that’s MY opinion
Ok but, serious question, what non-pinnacle retro has materials like SBBs?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude the materials aren’t 2nd to none period.ill let u go back and forth but that’s MY opinion
Seems like only snkrs, but eBay prices aren’t horrible.anyone found an online site that will sell the
AIR JORDAN 1 RETRO HIGH OG “LOS PRIMEROS” ?
I like the black on the SBB mostly. Feel like the 2.0 needs more black to break up the orange in comparison. That's what I meant by liking the color of the original SBB.I would not even call that "settle". The RSBB is a fine shoe on its own, the SBB just had more hype. I understand it feels to many as better quality, but looking at resell price, most likely not enough to justify the price difference.
bhm 17 has high quality leather throughout the entire shoe, not just in certain sections. black pleather on sbb is average.Ok but, serious question, what non-pinnacle retro has materials like SBBs?
wore mine to work the other day, my friend on the top right.
very well indeed, get a pair! Blacks pants are my go to whenever I throw on my 1's.never owned black jeans or pants but they complement OG 1s so well. gotta get a pair
bhm 17 has high quality leather throughout the entire shoe, not just in certain sections. black pleather on sbb is average.
The away version's insole had the shattered backboard print on it, just as the home/original version's. And both pairs have literally the same inspiration - the uniform worn in the exhibition game. Original shattered backboards were black toe colorblocking, away version was Chicago colorblocking. Unless there was some magical inspiration behind the orange toe on the originals that I don't know about.Sbb 2 are just orange chicagos to me. No inspiration on that one by Nike. Of course, only my opinion.
Dude the materials on the sbb is not the best material jordan has ever released on any retro. If you feel that way I really feel sorry for you because Jordan has you brainwashed, especially for an adidas representative.Ok but, serious question, what non-pinnacle retro has materials like SBBs?
Some better retros include 1994 Chicagos and black/red, 01 Japan releases. Again I want to make the argument that if you're paying $160 for a Jordan 1 from '15-'17 you're getting the same tier, same quality of materials. If you were really getting anything better, you'd be hit with premium prices like with pinnacles. Softer, more tumbled looking, that doesn't equal good quality.Ok but, serious question, what non-pinnacle retro has materials like SBBs?
that's cool. for me it's a dope shoe + i'm black. it's bigger than jumpman.Wow, what a waste to use those materials on a Jumpman-branded 1. I personally can’t bring myself to wear a Jumpman branded AJ 1 so I honestly wouldn’t even consider buying those.. I’m sure I’m not the only person who feels that way.
SBB 2.0 suck
Only people who hype em are the ones who don’t have the originals SBB
The away version's insole had the shattered backboard print on it, just as the home/original version's. And both pairs have literally the same inspiration - the uniform worn in the exhibition game. Original shattered backboards were black toe colorblocking, away version was Chicago colorblocking. Unless there was some magical inspiration behind the orange toe on the originals that I don't know about.
SailsOk but, serious question, what non-pinnacle retro has materials like SBBs?
Exactly, 80% of the SBB hype is the "God tier" materials.