- 2,225
- 14,450
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2013
Turbo greens today
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- 23,504
- 30,507
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
Turbo Greens was the one that got away from me this year.
- 7,841
- 20,411
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2012
You’ll be fine without them
- 33,416
- 39,154
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
Count yourself lucky.
1
123207
Guest
- 23,504
- 30,507
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
they'd be so much better if it had regular white leather. I was bummed on missing out until I saw and held them in person and was pretty disappointed with the crumbled paper fly-leather. But still, the color and the suede was well executed IMO. I would get them if they were retail or under.
- 38,506
- 76,075
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
- 23,504
- 30,507
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
1
126006
Guest
So they need to use heavy filter jigs to make this look even presentable. All you guys if you want em.
- 26,391
- 3,508
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2008
people will still go crazy for them
- 8,019
- 14,837
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2010
true, and if you really want them you should just buy them
resell on them is not terribly high in comparison to a lot of other releases
- 23,504
- 30,507
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
I just don't think they're worth over retail. I feel the same for the Spiderverse 1's.
- 6,045
- 15,044
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2015
You can literally still get then for close to retail on stockx but dont think you'll find them on sale if that's what you are aiming for. They're not "away" as much as you are unwilling.
- 23,504
- 30,507
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
- 9,422
- 16,292
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2017
Turbo greens are ok
I definitely wouldn’t pay $279 for them that’s for sure
To be fair bigger sizes are somewhat close to retail (10 and up)
Actually I wouldn’t pay anything over retail
They are a nice retail or below shoe
I definitely wouldn’t pay $279 for them that’s for sure
To be fair bigger sizes are somewhat close to retail (10 and up)
Actually I wouldn’t pay anything over retail
They are a nice retail or below shoe
- 6,045
- 15,044
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2015
$100 over retail is “close to retail”?
Ah, I forgot I'm a part of big foot gang. It's cheaper in my size.
1
126006
Guest
I wouldn’t pay 79 for them myself.
- 6,045
- 15,044
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2015
Definitely wouldnt be willing to pay upwards to 3 hundred for them. I got mine weeks after release and that's because I stumbled onto city gear and asked around and they had a pair that was returned. But you're not missing out if you dont have them. UNC > Turbos all day.
- 1,136
- 1,035
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2015
Question
I have a double LA2CHI
some dude want to trade for a one time used
2015 chi
Plush cash from my end.
I have a chi my self but don’t know if I should keep the laker maybe it won’t re lease again
I have a double LA2CHI
some dude want to trade for a one time used
2015 chi
Plush cash from my end.
I have a chi my self but don’t know if I should keep the laker maybe it won’t re lease again
- 9,422
- 16,292
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2017
Keep the lakers
Chi will release again soon
Lakers will never release again
Chi will release again soon
Lakers will never release again
- 1,044
- 1,233
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2015
Def keep the la to chi . Wayyyyyyy better shoe all around chi will hit the retro market again Lance Mountains never dropped again so you might wanna consider that as a example
- 1,136
- 1,035
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2015
True true that was my initial thought but now is final thanks
- 3,055
- 3,180
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2013
- 1,173
- 2,714
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2018
Chi will re retro for sure. Cant say the same for la chi.. so good observation
- 3,602
- 2,238
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
la to chi might not but LA possibly will?
