- 1,108
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2005
dallas by 28
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Driver, Jennings, Jones, Martin, Robinson >>>>>>> Owens, Crayton, Hurd + whoever else
Jason Witten > Driver, Jennings, Jones, Martin, Robinson
[table][tr][th=""]Rank[/th] [th=""] Player[/th] [th=""] Team[/th] [th=""]Pos[/th] [th=""] Total[/th] [th=""] Solo[/th] [th=""] Ast[/th] [th=""] Sck[/th] [th=""] SFTY[/th] [th=""] PDef[/th] [th=""] Int[/th] [th=""] TDs[/th] [th=""] Yds[/th] [th=""] Lng[/th] [th=""] FF[/th] [th=""] Rec[/th] [th=""] TD[/th] [/tr][tr][td]1[/td] [td]Aaron Kampman[/td] [td]GB[/td] [td]DE[/td] [td]51[/td] [td]38[/td] [td]13[/td] [td]11.0[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]1[/td] [td]1[/td] [td]0[/td] [/tr][tr][td]2[/td] [td]Jared Allen[/td] [td]KC[/td] [td]DE[/td] [td]37[/td] [td]30[/td] [td]7[/td] [td]9.5[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]2[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [/tr][tr][td]2[/td] [td]Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila[/td] [td]GB[/td] [td]DE[/td] [td]22[/td] [td]19[/td] [td]3[/td] [td]9.5[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]--[/td] [td]2[/td] [td]----[/td] [td]Originally Posted by isaxSJthebay08
Ware+Ellis>>>>>>>>>>KGB, Kampman
Packer fan talk about how good there pass rushers are but cowboys rushers are as or better then the packers rushers![]()
Jason Witten > Driver, Jennings, Jones, Martin, Robinson
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Jason Witten > Driver, Jennings, Jones, Martin, RobinsonOriginally Posted by HighRep87
Driver, Jennings, Jones, Martin, Robinson >>>>>>> Owens, Crayton, Hurd + whoever else
Originally Posted by isaxSJthebay08
Ware+Ellis>>>>>>>>>>KGB, Kampman
Packer fan talk about how good there pass rushers are but cowboys rushers are as or better then the packers rushers![]()
Originally Posted by MarleysProtege
^^^ dont forget greg didnt play for 5 weeks i believe ... and he not only gets sacks his damns elf but opens it up for demarcus ... and our starting NT is out for the year but I forgot injuries dont count for the cowboys ... lets see how many sacks kgb and kamp get if they arent able to play this week ... know your football
I don't think you can get sacks without playing?
... ... ... what do you think my point is? add the sacks that ellis and ware and others would have had if ellis was HEALTHY all year and we wouldbe looking at ware probably in the teens right now and ellis with a few more along with spencer and spears increasing their totals ...
If you want to play the out for 5 weeks card, go ahead. Just know that KGB plays 1 out of every 5 downs (defensively) and still gets those numbers. What the hell do you mean with know your football? Our defensive line has THREE sack league leaders, who total 6 FF.
... ... ... ... ... lets see, kgb only plays 20% of the time on D ... ... ... I'm guessing even if that is the case (which i doubt is true,but I'm not sure so I don't really know) he comes in on passing downs where his only job is to rush the passer ... thank you for proving my point asware and ellis have to play the run all game and still rush the passer and still get those numbers ... there is no breathers for ware he plays every down andis a beast better than kgb will ever be ... know your footbal in reference to comparing peoples stats who havent even played and being all giddy because youhave two shutdown corners who allow you to blitz more on d whereas we have been playing soft and dropping coverage all year ... put your secondary on our teamand ware and ellis have more sacks easily, but because we have 2 holes in our secondary damn near every play (reeves and williams in coverage) we cant letloose like we want to ...
edit... we have 30 sacks and 13 ff this year ... you have 32 and 11 ... That big difference is insurmountable in todays NFL lololol
... ... ... what do you think my point is? add the sacks that ellis and ware and others would have had if ellis was HEALTHY all year and we would be looking at ware probably in the teens right now and ellis with a few more along with spencer and spears increasing their totals ...Originally Posted by MarleysProtege
I don't think you can get sacks without playing?
If you want to play the out for 5 weeks card, go ahead. Just know that KGB plays 1 out of every 5 downs (defensively) and still gets those numbers. What the hell do you mean with know your football? Our defensive line has THREE sack league leaders, who total 6 FF.
... ... ... ... ... lets see, kgb only plays 20% of the time on D ... ... ... I'm guessing even if that is the case (which i doubt is true, but I'm not sure so I don't really know) he comes in on passing downs where his only job is to rush the passer ... thank you for proving my point as ware and ellis have to play the run all game and still rush the passer and still get those numbers ... there is no breathers for ware he plays every down and is a beast better than kgb will ever be ... know your footbal in reference to comparing peoples stats who havent even played and being all giddy because you have two shutdown corners who allow you to blitz more on d whereas we have been playing soft and dropping coverage all year ... put your secondary on our team and ware and ellis have more sacks easily, but because we have 2 holes in our secondary damn near every play (reeves and williams in coverage) we cant let loose like we want to ...
" I'm glad you have access to a parallel universe where you can see possible results, stats, etc. of if's and but's" - Some NT'er![]()
The KGB thing is true, and you're right about the passing downs... Still you're comparing a DE to a LB. If you don't even know how KGB plays,how can you say Ware is better than he will ever be? I mean, I'm a homer, but you're a homer who has smoked one to many with Marley. I'd also liketo add Fraij didn't COMPARE stats, he simply showed the leaderboard. The fact that 3 of them are Packers is simply coincidental.
P.S. You know nothing about the Packers defense if you think our secondary allows us to "blitz more". What actually happens is our DL is so good,we don't have to blitz, and still bring crazy pressure. Look at the Lions and Carolina game sacks, only 1 or 2 of them involved 5+ man rushes. We get sackswith 2-3 (4 if KGB is in) man rushes.![]()
Originally Posted by MarleysProtege
yeah and in that parallel universe i live in, its obvious that if a person who is one of the leaders in sacks so far this year played in 4 or 5 more games healthy than he has, he probably would have more sacks ... i dont know that might be reaching a little ... ... ...
and i do stand corrected, you are right about your front four getting pressure, but what i meant to say was your secondary shuts down opposing receivers to where you can get coverage sacks ... If the Cowboys have ONE coverage sack this year, I would be surprised ... Dont underestimate the job your secondary does, having good cover corners and safeties makes your d line look a lot better than it really is even though they are good ... and ware>kgb bottom line dont make that argument please
I will however say that Kampman > Ware easily.
really? you are the ultimate homer. lets see, ware is in his third season and has a total of 28.5 sacks. kampman at the end of his third year was at 7 sacks.since 2005 kampman has a total of 33 sacks, compared to wares total of 28.5. yes kampman is a good player, but easily better than ware? you should really juststop posting. you look like a fool.
I will however say that Kampman > Ware easily.
I was just about to respond to another one of your posts regarding the pass rush until I saw this...
Guaranteed you are one of the VERY few people that would make that argument, so I'm not gonna bother.
I was just about to respond to another one of your posts regarding the pass rush until I saw this...Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
I will however say that Kampman > Ware easily.
Originally Posted by MarleysProtege
youre confusing even yourself lol ... but on the real Cowboys > Packers ... but I wouldnt be surprised if the packers win, but I'm not worried because in the playoffs lambeau aint too tuff word to mike vick in jail
Originally Posted by MarleysProtege
youre confusing even yourself lol ... but on the real Cowboys > Packers ... but I wouldnt be surprised if the packers win, but I'm not worried because in the playoffs lambeau aint too tuff word to mike vick in jail