- 17,236
- 1,943
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
Dland, I believe Bucks weren't gonna give up a big man without receiving one.
I thought about a little after the trade, and I don't think it's as bad as it seems...Especially not the way that Youtube guy makes it seem.
We've always said we wanted a competent center, well now we got one. Defense, boards, blocks, post game and etc.
We got rid of an undersized 2 guard, and the tempo last night was much better (who knows, maybe it was just 1 game and against the Kings).
Sure we gave up a little more than one would hope for, but it wasn't all that bad of a trade.
The risk factor - Bogut staying healthy...Read Andrew630's retweet where in a 7 year span Monta played 413 games and Bogut played 406.
The only thing I'm not sure what to do is Sjax...Do you play him, sit him, or buy out his contract? If you swallow that tough pill, you get 10mill (I think thats his contract) in cap space by the end of 2013.
Lastly, theyve got to start tanking...stop winning meaningless games.
I thought about a little after the trade, and I don't think it's as bad as it seems...Especially not the way that Youtube guy makes it seem.
We've always said we wanted a competent center, well now we got one. Defense, boards, blocks, post game and etc.
We got rid of an undersized 2 guard, and the tempo last night was much better (who knows, maybe it was just 1 game and against the Kings).
Sure we gave up a little more than one would hope for, but it wasn't all that bad of a trade.
The risk factor - Bogut staying healthy...Read Andrew630's retweet where in a 7 year span Monta played 413 games and Bogut played 406.
The only thing I'm not sure what to do is Sjax...Do you play him, sit him, or buy out his contract? If you swallow that tough pill, you get 10mill (I think thats his contract) in cap space by the end of 2013.
Lastly, theyve got to start tanking...stop winning meaningless games.