- 21,365
- 812
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
So Jermaine's foul on James Jones was downgraded to a personal foul. In turn, James Jones foul on Pierce was upgraded to a flagrant-1. Good to know the refs were indeed wrong on both ends. Corrupt as @!#$, I knew it.
Official Heat vs Celtics Thread. The Wagon Lives On. Choo Choo!
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by cosmiccanon,
- Start date
- 21,365
- 812
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
So Jermaine's foul on James Jones was downgraded to a personal foul. In turn, James Jones foul on Pierce was upgraded to a flagrant-1. Good to know the refs were indeed wrong on both ends. Corrupt as @!#$, I knew it.
jumpmanfromdabay
Banned
- 25,730
- 2,900
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
Go C's these bandwagon heat fans are annoying
jumpmanfromdabay
Banned
- 25,730
- 2,900
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
Go C's these bandwagon heat fans are annoying
- 1,606
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2009
Why do people feel that Shaq will be a factor in this series? He basically stopped mattering as soon as he joined Phoenix.
- 1,606
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2009
Why do people feel that Shaq will be a factor in this series? He basically stopped mattering as soon as he joined Phoenix.
- 1,769
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
Can't wait for game 2!!!!! GO HEAT!!!!!
- 1,769
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
Can't wait for game 2!!!!! GO HEAT!!!!!
ohdannyboy
Banned
- 5,465
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
No one wants to bang in the post with this guy. He's definitely a game changer.
ohdannyboy
Banned
- 5,465
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
No one wants to bang in the post with this guy. He's definitely a game changer.
- 34,505
- 27,734
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
I love it
- 34,505
- 27,734
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
I love it
- 849
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2011
I don't think Shaq will make a difference in the post as long as Chris Bosh continues to play like an idiot and LeBron keeps acting like he's allergic to paint.Originally Posted by ohdannyboy
No one wants to bang in the post with this guy. He's definitely a game changer.
- 849
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2011
I don't think Shaq will make a difference in the post as long as Chris Bosh continues to play like an idiot and LeBron keeps acting like he's allergic to paint.Originally Posted by ohdannyboy
No one wants to bang in the post with this guy. He's definitely a game changer.
xtapolapacetl
Banned
- 6,841
- 126
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2006
Originally Posted by ohdannyboy
No one wants to bang in the post with this guy. He's definitely a game changer.
Everyone wants to run fastbreaks when he's playing defense though.
And besides, how many points did the Heat get from bangin in the post in game 1 anyway?
xtapolapacetl
Banned
- 6,841
- 126
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2006
Originally Posted by ohdannyboy
No one wants to bang in the post with this guy. He's definitely a game changer.
Everyone wants to run fastbreaks when he's playing defense though.
And besides, how many points did the Heat get from bangin in the post in game 1 anyway?
- 5,298
- 273
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2007
No wonder there are laker fans rooting for Boston in here,
No way they beating the heat ths year.
Shaq will be a liability on the court with his slow pick and roll rotation
Unless he is out there to just try to injure someone.
No way they beating the heat ths year.
Shaq will be a liability on the court with his slow pick and roll rotation
Unless he is out there to just try to injure someone.
- 5,298
- 273
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2007
No wonder there are laker fans rooting for Boston in here,
No way they beating the heat ths year.
Shaq will be a liability on the court with his slow pick and roll rotation
Unless he is out there to just try to injure someone.
No way they beating the heat ths year.
Shaq will be a liability on the court with his slow pick and roll rotation
Unless he is out there to just try to injure someone.
xtapolapacetl
Banned
- 6,841
- 126
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2006
It would be wrong to say that he would be a liability overall, but the people in this thread definitely ignore the negative aspects of having Shaq playing when they mention that the Celtics need him. This dude didn't switch teams a million times over the last 3-4 seasons for no reason. And he's only gotten older, slower and fatter in the process.
xtapolapacetl
Banned
- 6,841
- 126
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2006
It would be wrong to say that he would be a liability overall, but the people in this thread definitely ignore the negative aspects of having Shaq playing when they mention that the Celtics need him. This dude didn't switch teams a million times over the last 3-4 seasons for no reason. And he's only gotten older, slower and fatter in the process.
- 816
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2008
I have to agree with this. I'd rather stick with the other O'Neal
- 816
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2008
I have to agree with this. I'd rather stick with the other O'Neal
- 442
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
i stayed out of this thread bc I knew it'd be full of bandwagon heat fans but I just came in to say this:
1. Garnett shoots much better than he did
2. Rondo can and has played much better against the heat than he did
3. The c's as a whole can play much better defense than they did
4. The heat can try to play "physical", but they're not that team, and in the end it wont work
5. The NBA rescinds a call that individually netted the heat 5 points in one play
6. If Paul Pierce wasn't ejected, which was ##%%$*%*, i can assume he would have made at least 2 baskets, and at least led the game to be closer than it was.
My point is, the c's underperformed in virtually every facet of the game, and it wasn't the defense, they missed easy shots.
Through all of this they only lost by 9 points. C's should be feeling good, that win for the heat was fools gold. Their confidence will be up bc the media is talking them up, but it's fools gold.
1. Garnett shoots much better than he did
2. Rondo can and has played much better against the heat than he did
3. The c's as a whole can play much better defense than they did
4. The heat can try to play "physical", but they're not that team, and in the end it wont work
5. The NBA rescinds a call that individually netted the heat 5 points in one play
6. If Paul Pierce wasn't ejected, which was ##%%$*%*, i can assume he would have made at least 2 baskets, and at least led the game to be closer than it was.
My point is, the c's underperformed in virtually every facet of the game, and it wasn't the defense, they missed easy shots.
Through all of this they only lost by 9 points. C's should be feeling good, that win for the heat was fools gold. Their confidence will be up bc the media is talking them up, but it's fools gold.
- 442
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
i stayed out of this thread bc I knew it'd be full of bandwagon heat fans but I just came in to say this:
1. Garnett shoots much better than he did
2. Rondo can and has played much better against the heat than he did
3. The c's as a whole can play much better defense than they did
4. The heat can try to play "physical", but they're not that team, and in the end it wont work
5. The NBA rescinds a call that individually netted the heat 5 points in one play
6. If Paul Pierce wasn't ejected, which was ##%%$*%*, i can assume he would have made at least 2 baskets, and at least led the game to be closer than it was.
My point is, the c's underperformed in virtually every facet of the game, and it wasn't the defense, they missed easy shots.
Through all of this they only lost by 9 points. C's should be feeling good, that win for the heat was fools gold. Their confidence will be up bc the media is talking them up, but it's fools gold.
1. Garnett shoots much better than he did
2. Rondo can and has played much better against the heat than he did
3. The c's as a whole can play much better defense than they did
4. The heat can try to play "physical", but they're not that team, and in the end it wont work
5. The NBA rescinds a call that individually netted the heat 5 points in one play
6. If Paul Pierce wasn't ejected, which was ##%%$*%*, i can assume he would have made at least 2 baskets, and at least led the game to be closer than it was.
My point is, the c's underperformed in virtually every facet of the game, and it wasn't the defense, they missed easy shots.
Through all of this they only lost by 9 points. C's should be feeling good, that win for the heat was fools gold. Their confidence will be up bc the media is talking them up, but it's fools gold.
- 34,505
- 27,734
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
I don't car what happens in this series, its a win win for me either way it goes. I've got friends that are annoyingly over confident on both sides! When their team loses, I'm gonna let them have it. I'm pulling for Miami tho, and I hope they sweep them
