xtapolapacetl
Banned
- 6,841
- 126
Okay, so after you thought you could win this argument by attempting to throw the book at me, saying show me a rule that says a player can't extend his knee, and after I do so and hit you with a cold hard FACT, now you switch it to some "natural motion" bull #@+%. If extending your knee is part of a natural motion, why is there mention of "knee" in the two quotes from the rule book that I posted to begin with?
So Garnett JUMPS from WITHIN the restricted area and clearly HITS Wade on the arm, but it should be an OFFENSIVE foul because Wade had his leg outstretched, while Battier STANDS clearly OUTSIDE of the restricted area and Durant with an extended knee is still able to get a perfectly good shot off just like with the LeBron "foul" at the very end, but in this case it's a BLOCKING foul.
And by the way, after I watched the replay several times, Durant may have let go of the ball before any contact was made Battier at all. So another possibility is that it could've been a no-call. And after the play continued, Mario Chalmers ended up grabbing the rebound and it would've been Heat ball. It should've been a charge and the 6th foul on Durant. It could've been a no-call. But noooo, it was a blocking foul and in the end 2 points for the Thunder.
Yeah, you're a "Lakers" fan all right and completely objective when it comes to discussing Kobe, since he's part of the "Lakers", the team you root for. You'd do anything for your "Lakers", even root for the Celtics two playoffs in a row. Not to mention those Cavs-Celtics series. You would gladly choose the possibility of the Celtics having 20-21 championships compared to the Lakers 16 right about now than the thought of LeBron having a single ring.
So Garnett JUMPS from WITHIN the restricted area and clearly HITS Wade on the arm, but it should be an OFFENSIVE foul because Wade had his leg outstretched, while Battier STANDS clearly OUTSIDE of the restricted area and Durant with an extended knee is still able to get a perfectly good shot off just like with the LeBron "foul" at the very end, but in this case it's a BLOCKING foul.
And by the way, after I watched the replay several times, Durant may have let go of the ball before any contact was made Battier at all. So another possibility is that it could've been a no-call. And after the play continued, Mario Chalmers ended up grabbing the rebound and it would've been Heat ball. It should've been a charge and the 6th foul on Durant. It could've been a no-call. But noooo, it was a blocking foul and in the end 2 points for the Thunder.
Yeah, you're a "Lakers" fan all right and completely objective when it comes to discussing Kobe, since he's part of the "Lakers", the team you root for. You'd do anything for your "Lakers", even root for the Celtics two playoffs in a row. Not to mention those Cavs-Celtics series. You would gladly choose the possibility of the Celtics having 20-21 championships compared to the Lakers 16 right about now than the thought of LeBron having a single ring.