- 71,581
- 114,337
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
C'mon man ![Laugh :lol: :lol:](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/laugh.gif)
![Laugh :lol: :lol:](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/laugh.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Probably need both, that coaching job should be one of the most attractive as wellDo they need defense? Or do they need a defensive system?
Either way, I agree that they don't need to go big.
Mavs drafting luka
So Carmelo averaged 7.3 points and 0.3 assists in the playoffs and he’s getting $28m next year? Crazy!
That's exactly what they shouldn't do. They need to continue to tank and look for stars in the draft not spend big money on C-list free agents.Mavs should look into Randle & Jabari. Small ball lineup with Bari at the 4, Randle at the 5 would work well.
They have the money and no lure for FAs. Kind of have to crapshoot it with RFAs and see how it goes.
At a certain point gotta start prepping for Dirk to be gone.
Wizards don't have $$ Wall, Porter, Beal and Mahinmi are 90% of their cap.Aside from Nerlens, what other bigs can the Wizards go after this off season?
That's exactly what they shouldn't do. They need to continue to tank and look for stars in the draft not spend big money on C-list free agents.
Baynes and MonroeAside from Nerlens, what other bigs can the Wizards go after this off season?
When you are as far away as the Mavs are why spend big on a player like Randle? It doesn't make sense. Even if Doncic is a star that trio you described is... not good.They can do both though.
DSJ (don’t even care if you hate him)
Doncic
Randle
That’s a good start
When you are as far away as the Mavs are why spend big on a player like Randle? It doesn't make sense. Even if Doncic is a star that trio you described is... not good.
I would say the same to the Knicks signing Randle. He isn't a next level piece, he's on the level of the free agents the Mavs have been signing in recent years. Yeah he's young but the Mavs are 2-3 years away at best.
Put it this way: I think Randle will get more than he deserves on the market this summer and I'd rather keep the cap space because I think he's totally replaceable. Being 2-3 years away is fine, but what I meant is you are under no pressure to sign players now in order to contend with your roster. It's not like a Wizards or Bucks who might have to take a shot at a Randle (if they had space) because of the makeup of their team.What’s big money? Randle isn’t getting a max. He’s exactly what they need in a 3rd piece at becoming a good team. Luka/Randle/ DSJ still yields a lottery pick too.
And there’s nothing wrong with being 2-3 years away.
Wizards don't have $$ Wall, Porter, Beal and Mahinmi are 90% of their cap.
Baynes and Monroe
Is Randle totally replaceable? It's a rarity that a talented young player like that like that is even on the market in the first place.
A buyout doesn't even make sense though.
Is Randle totally replaceable? It's a rarity that a talented young player like that like that is even on the market in the first place.
So Carmelo averaged 7.3 points and 0.3 assists in the playoffs and he’s getting $28m next year? Crazy!