- 931
- 580
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
Last edited:
**OFFICIAL NIKE CLOTHING THREAD**POST ALL NIKE CLOTHING**NIKE SPORTS WEAR*ACG**
- 4,289
- 2,368
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2013
did Villa use the wrong photo? is that a picture of the 1.0?
Their site shows style # 585204 - 063
1.0
Grey - 545343-063
Charcoal - 545343-032
Black - 545343-010
2.0
Obsidian - 585204-453
Grey - 585204-063
Black - 585204-010
- 297
- 347
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2012
Thanks to this forum, I've gone absolutely crazing in picking up these pants over the past week. Literally had to make an excel spreadsheet to track everything I've done through Nike/NBCUniversal/Nike Outlets/Etc. Thanks to all of the insight on the forums - really wish I would have been keeping track of this stuff a few months back.
For anyone still worried about sizing, I'm 6'2"/205lbs and have tried both L and XL (pictured below are the Black 2.0's). If I were keeping these strictly for working out, the Large feels fine, but fits more like a traditional sweatpant, (I have bigger thighs and around the butt was more form fitting), whereas the XL has a little more room in the thigh/crotch area and will work for lounging and athletic activities. The waist didn't seem different between the two. The biggest difference was in the calf area.
I have a bunch of pairs coming in (1.0 - 3.0, so if there are any questions or photos needed, just drop me a line)..
Apologies for bad pics:
LARGE:
X-LARGE:
For anyone still worried about sizing, I'm 6'2"/205lbs and have tried both L and XL (pictured below are the Black 2.0's). If I were keeping these strictly for working out, the Large feels fine, but fits more like a traditional sweatpant, (I have bigger thighs and around the butt was more form fitting), whereas the XL has a little more room in the thigh/crotch area and will work for lounging and athletic activities. The waist didn't seem different between the two. The biggest difference was in the calf area.
I have a bunch of pairs coming in (1.0 - 3.0, so if there are any questions or photos needed, just drop me a line)..
Apologies for bad pics:
LARGE:
X-LARGE:
- 1,907
- 1,100
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
Of course there was free shipping. I looked around and found a bunch of codes that didn't work. Bah! How is their customer service if I call will I get anywhere? anybody deal with them on a mistake before?
- 75
- 46
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
Just gonna put this out there just in case there is someone looking, if anyone wants to trade their MEDIUM tech pants for my LARGE tech pants. I have the large grey and black 2.0's if anyone has medium looking to size up.
- 818
- 233
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2012
Obsidian color tech pants are much lighter in person than the NDC photo. Sorry if this was mentioned already.
- 234
- 14
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2004
So are the black 1.0 and 2.0 pants basically the same product?
- 92
- 25
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
The fit is slightly different.
- 4,289
- 2,368
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2013
Can somebody chime in on this?
- 7,927
- 2,989
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2004
More than likely the 2.0. Its been a few months since anyone has mentioned they bought the 1.0 from a retailer.
- 699
- 252
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
Just got my black ones in from Villa, according to the style number they're 2.0's but they definitely don't have any subtle stripes. Diaper effect is very real.
endeesee
Banned
- 7,788
- 1,491
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2014
Black 1.0 and 2.0 are the same...
- 4,289
- 2,368
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2013
what bout the grey? has that black stripe on the 2 as well?
- 699
- 252
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
Others in this thread have said the fit was improved on the 2.0's. I've also seen people say that all 2.0's have a striped effect (including black) and that doesn't appear to be the case with mine. Just helping people out who are considering buying them.
- 32
- 12
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2012
the 1.0 are DEF more slim than the 2.0. Anyone who has the USOC version are they closer to the 1.0 or 2.0 fit?
- 7,968
- 6,828
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
i want the red tech pants, but them prices for the few ive seen on eBay are ugly
- 800
- 225
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
It's about the same
- 4,169
- 3,858
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2013
- 1,572
- 767
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
So basically the USOC are the latest and greatest tech pant from nike thicker, warmer and stronger. Nike has built the most technologically advanced pair of pants ever
Meh, well untill the 4.0's are released anyway
Last edited:
- 32
- 12
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2012
thanks man, how about the AW77 CUFFED FLEECE same fit as the 2.0s or looser?So basically the USOC are the latest and greatest tech pant from nike thicker, warmer and stronger. Nike has built the most technologically advanced pair of pants ever
Meh, well untill the 4.0's are released anyway
endeesee
Banned
- 7,788
- 1,491
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2014
So basically the USOC are the latest and greatest tech pant from nike thicker, warmer and stronger. Nike has built the most technologically advanced pair of pants ever
Meh, well untill the 4.0's are released anyway
is this real life? they are all the same thickness...
- 3,562
- 2,078
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2012
Technically 1.0 is 1mm, 2.0 is 2mm, and 3.0 is 3mm.
But a millimeter is pretty damn small. Probably not the most noticeable aspect.
Last edited:
- 1,572
- 767
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
I was about to write a response to the real life question :x but thanks for the clarification JerkStore
I would have quoted you anyway...
Last edited:
endeesee
Banned
- 7,788
- 1,491
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2014
oh lawd... them MM...
where did you read that 1mm stuff?
where did you read that 1mm stuff?
- 92
- 25
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
Those fit looser.
