- 19,121
- 20,890
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2010
Tomorrow WIR "the boys will be fine"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
All 22 of the Eagles' sacks this season -- they are fourth in the NFL in sacks per pass play -- have come from defensive linemen. Jason Babin has nine, Cullen Jenkins five, Trent Cole four, Darryl Tapp two, Trevor Laws one, and Mike Patterson one.
This was by design.
After firing McDermott in January, the first coaching move Andy Reid made was to lure defensive line coach Jim Washburn away from Tennessee. Washburn had said before that if a team has to blitz more than necessary, then its front four isn't doing its job.
A few weeks after Washburn was hired, Castillo was named coordinator. At an introductory news conference in February, it became clear that Castillo would adopt a more conservative approach than his predecessors.
Simplification was the buzz word.
"If you blitz all the time," Washburn said then, "you'll get killed."
There was a lot of talk in the Eagles' locker room late Sunday night about how they all expected it to take time for all of the new players and all of the new coaches to get together on the same page in the new defensive system. There was a lot of change in the offseason and a lot asked of a lot of people in a short period of time. But in Sunday night's game, everything the Eagles wanted to do on defense (and on offense, for that matter) seemed to work. One of the keys has been the ability of the coaching staff to get the players to continue buying into the new ideas even when they weren't working and the team was losing four games in a row.
The Eagles beefed up on the defensive line in the offseason because, if you're going to rely on your front four to create pressure, you need to have a great front four. The talent and depth they acquired with guys like Jenkins and Babin allow them to put Washburn's theories into practice. You may still see the Eagles blitz every now and then, but when they do it's going to be to throw a changeup. It's no longer the basis of their defensive philosophy. This would seem a far more efficient way of doing things. Time will tell if the Eagles can make it an effective one long-term.
link:
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/32177/the-eagles-have-ditched-the-blitz
yeah pretty much, Cowboys got a cakewalk schedule so they're sitting pretty even if the Giants collapse. Plus there's NO chance we get a wild cardOriginally Posted by k3stacks
Barring an epic collapse by the giants. we done
our terrible O-Line just forces McCoy to stay in the backfield and block, he caught a few screen passes but when we got up we needed to keep feeding him and we failed to do so.Originally Posted by UPPTEMPO8387
Posted this in the WIR thread but figured I'd post it here so we could have a troll-less conversation amongst fellow Eagles fans:
I'm not really in the mood to post all my week 9 thoughts because I'm angry over that Eagles loss, but to all the non-trolls, I have a question regarding this team..How many teams in the league have a RB as good as McCoy that gets used less in crucial moments? The Eagles had a lead that was because of McCoy's great plays, and going into the 4th he BARELY touches the ball the rest of the game..he might have literally had 2 touches after scoring that TD to give Philly the lead..It's unbelievable..If the Raiders had the lead, would they not run the offense through McFadden?..Vikings wouldn't do it with Peterson? Frank Gore in SF? Fred Jackson in Buffalo? I can go on all day..If you have a star RB that is CARRYING the team on his back, you don't start throwing passes the rest of the game