everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
That's far from the truth.
Worst we'd see under Hilary is the status quo.
Trump would run the country into the ground.
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
That's far from the truth.
Worst we'd see under Hilary is the status quo.
Trump would run the country into the ground.
- 64,966
- 196,172
Bull ****
Last edited:
- 28,757
- 11,962
My android bro, I would like to say I highly disagree with you. I am no fan of Hilary, but to say she is as bad a choice as Trump doesn't process with me
swendro
formerly swendro88
- 13,005
- 9,391
- 39,082
- 55,199
back to the jordan forum you go
- 3,903
- 5,011
The friggin nerve of this guy to blame the media when the media carried him all through the Republican primaries and gave him all kinds of undeserved exposure. The media is probably the main culprit in him coming this far. Had they ignored him like the insect that he was early throughout the Republican primaries, there's no way in hell he would've even sniffed the spot of the Republican candidate for president.
I hate Marco Rubio's guts, but I could kind of see his point about the media not giving him (Rubio) any attention every time he confronted Drumpf on any kind of issues, but when he talked about how small Drumpf's hands were he got the most media attention.
Last edited:
What makes you say this?
Your list of pros and cons is an equal length for each candidate?
Just curious
- 3,903
- 5,011
I get the sense that there's literally no situation that could possibly occur where The Bigot would simply take the L, admit that he was wrong or admit that he lost without him doing some sort of deflecting, blaming someone else or trying to put some sort of a spin so that he somehow ends up looking good. Like that "apology" he made for the "grab them by the *****" tabe: The guy literally couldn't connect two sentences all throughout that "apology" without deflecting onto Hillary and trying to say she did something worse. He's pretty much like Cartman in that South Park episode after Wendy beat his ***:
superblytrife
Supporter
- 21,027
- 22,715
- 87,866
- 50,387
I don't know what reality you living in b. Are the Knicks 75 time NBA champions there?
This whole "were ******" either way mentality seems to be especially anti-reality/anti-facts.
Last edited:
- 70,049
- 24,223
we really ignoring da fact that Hillary is da 2ND unfavorable candidate ever behind Trump and da most Unfavorable Democratic Democratic candidate ever?
- 64,966
- 196,172
we really ignoring da fact that Hillary is da 2ND unfavorable candidate ever behind Trump and da most Unfavorable Democratic Democratic candidate ever?
Are we really ignoring the fact that this doesn't prove anything.
But I like how you admit her favorability rating is still better than Trump, you know, the candidate you're supporting.
- 49,029
- 61,330
I don't know what reality you living in b. Are the Knicks 75 time NBA champions there?
This whole "were ******" either way mentality seems to be especially anti-reality/anti-facts.
Enlighten me why I'm wrong and should believe otherwise. I really would like to know. This country has so many issues and real things that need to be addressed/improved and neither candidates are presenting realistic solutions to those issues at hand. At the end of the day Trump is who he is as a person (awful) and a total neophyte at being a politician. Hill has 30+ years in this field and STILL can't separate herself from Trump on a level where someone who has no dog in the fight can look at her as a viable option. She is literally one of the worst democratic elects in the history of this country. Donald shouldn't even be in the same stratosphere as her
Last edited:
- 64,966
- 196,172
I don't know what reality you living in b. Are the Knicks 75 time NBA champions there?
This whole "were ******" either way mentality seems to be especially anti-reality/anti-facts.
Enlighten me why I'm wrong and should believe otherwise. I really would like to know. This country has so many issues and real things that need to be addressed/improved and neither candidates are presenting realistic solutions to those issues at hand. At the end of the day Trump is who he is as a person (awful) and a total neophyte at being a politician. Hill has 30+ years in this field and STILL can't separate herself from Trump on a level where someone who has no dog in the fight can look at her as a viable option. She is literally one of the worst democratic elects in the history of this country. Donald shouldn't even be in the same stratosphere as her
She has policy proposal for almost all the major issues. And her proposal and very realistic, vague in some areas, but realistic.
It seems like you just hate her, that is find, but don't push a strawman argument of why she is so terrible.
Also you made the claim, and you haven't provided any evidence to back it up. But now you expect people to disprove something you haven't even proven. Umm that's not how it works dude.
Last edited:
- 20,235
- 4,227
Some people are just going to vote Republican no matter what.
- 49,029
- 61,330
"I hate her"
holy generalization Batman. I'm not even gonna waste either of our time with this exchange you seem to have your mind all the way made up off of very little from my end. Me not being impressed with her campaign thus far considering her extensive experience in politics automatically means I hate her. You sound ridiculous
Last edited:
- 70,049
- 24,223
we really ignoring da fact that Hillary is da 2ND unfavorable candidate ever behind Trump and da most Unfavorable Democratic Democratic candidate ever?
Are we really ignoring the fact that this doesn't prove anything.
But I like how you admit her favorability rating is still better than Trump, you know, the candidate you're supporting.
Donald only been doing this since last June... Hillary's been crap awful for 30+ years
da fact that a straight political rookie can beat her makes her look terrible.
Last edited:
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
But he's not...beating her 
- 49,029
- 61,330
I want to hear my presidential elect sincerely speak about the social injustices of people in impoverished communities. I want to hear about what's gonna be done about corporations like ALEC and CCA. I want to hear about why minorities continue to struggle to make a dent in government and city jobs, our deplorable public school system, healthcare, realistic efforts to improve relations with law enforcement, stopping police brutality, etc. I want to hear this dialogue spoken about passionately and hear about how we can start the creation of systems to change these things. This is all I'm asking for
Last edited:
- 70,049
- 24,223
fixed.
- 70,049
- 24,223
But he's not...beating her
and she's not running away with anything...
While Trump's unfavorables average to 60% her's are at 52%.
2 historically very unpopular people, which isn't gonna inspire turnout...and u know what happens to low turn out elections [emoji]128064[/emoji]
- 6,921
- 16,924
One of the problems associated with decades of conservative talk radio is what I call the "Cincinatus Complex." Republicans are always waiting for a hero who will come in and save everything.
America has many problems but it is not in need of a savior. Furthermore, our system of government is not based on lone individuals acting as saviors.
Democrats do not jump from the messianic to the apocalyptic. We understand that we are part of a broad coalition and we will solve our problems by consistently creating majorities for our coalition. Therefore, Hillary Clinton need not be a savior to earn the progressive vote. She is the the top line name that is part of massive electoral effort that is taking place at the Federal, State and local level.
So let the wikileaks keep on leaking. Progressive will vote for Clinton and the rest of the Democratic ticket and we will be able to proceed with the knowledge that we have to organize and pressure those Democrats.
For Progressives, we know that there is much work to be done after this election. It is not as exciting as making a businessman into a savior-Dictator but then again we live in the real world and not the simplistic world of conservative talk radio.
America has many problems but it is not in need of a savior. Furthermore, our system of government is not based on lone individuals acting as saviors.
Democrats do not jump from the messianic to the apocalyptic. We understand that we are part of a broad coalition and we will solve our problems by consistently creating majorities for our coalition. Therefore, Hillary Clinton need not be a savior to earn the progressive vote. She is the the top line name that is part of massive electoral effort that is taking place at the Federal, State and local level.
So let the wikileaks keep on leaking. Progressive will vote for Clinton and the rest of the Democratic ticket and we will be able to proceed with the knowledge that we have to organize and pressure those Democrats.
For Progressives, we know that there is much work to be done after this election. It is not as exciting as making a businessman into a savior-Dictator but then again we live in the real world and not the simplistic world of conservative talk radio.
superblytrife
Supporter
- 21,027
- 22,715
I agree with this stuff.
But just because Clinton doesn't address all of the things that YOU want doesn't mean she hasn't proposed some things that can help our country as a whole. That's why I can't stand when people equate Trump and Clinton. Dude has some of the worst policy (can we even call it that?) ever. Dude can't even speak properly about his policy because he doesn't even know what it is.
And btw, she has addressed some of those things. That said, you won't hear much of it during a debate because Trump knows he can't really go there or he'll look even more foolish. But on the stump she has spoken about some of those things. Whether or not you think she's sincere or passionate enough is your call. But she HAS addressed some of your concerns. The info is out there for you to find.
- 64,966
- 196,172
- 64,966
- 196,172
"I hate her"
You call her dreadful and compare her to a serious disease, and provide no evidence to back up this point except "I'm not impressed by her campaign thus far...."
Yet I'm the one the sounds ridiculous.
Ok pa, ok
Similar threads
