- Aug 2, 2006
- 34,145
- 29,489
Dude has a security detail as a royal. He criticized his Throne for taking it away when he left. His being a royal and an Afghan war vet makes him a target. but as a royal, he was provided a big security detail
Harry was a millionaire from the inheritance from their mother.
As a working member of the Royal Family, he received financial support from his dad, I don't think Charles and William had to line-item approve every purchase he made.
Again, I feel you are putting a lii too much sauce on it to basically say that you value personal autonomy to the point being a royal doesn't seem appealing to you. Ok cool, that is a personal choice
However, I would guess a good bit of middle-class people in developed countries would trade with Harry too. A middle-class life comes with its own set of constraints
I feel sorry for the dude for the unique life circumstances he experienced, and he didn't get to pick his life. But on paper, I just don't see being a royal being that bad compared to much of middle-class life.
it's ultimately just my opinion. I wouldn't take it.
needing a security detail to just to exist in public would really suck imo
and it seems like they were holding it over him as a means of control.
to the point that an accused sex criminal got to keep the security but he lost his.
the millions that you can't really spend without public scrutiny okay from the crown
and it must just warp your mind being born into being strange ritualistic prop for the rest of your life.
it just seems like a horrible gilded cage.
Id rather have the constraints of normal middle class life.
his bro had him and his girl living in a cottage built for 5'4 18th century humans,
and you gotta deal with racist press insulting your wife?
nah man im good, ill go to work and live a normal life thanks.