- 14,686
- 35,469
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
- 5,957
- 6,986
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2015
- 150,331
- 200,774
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- 150,331
- 200,774
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- 32,834
- 81,404
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2013
Maybe if cops were properly compensated they wouldn't have to smuggle drugs into the country to make ends meet 
- 150,331
- 200,774
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- 15,557
- 8,287
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
So God keeping them safe is God giving them guns?
The mental gymnastics man.
“Don’t love your life in fear!!”
Proceeds to make entire personally about possessing weapons to keep them safe but they aren’t living in fear.
- 33,581
- 28,864
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
Has anyone read a good breakdown of The RESTRICT Act?
preferably not from a tiktoker
preferably not from a tiktoker
RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
The right wing judges are sick, sick people
- 26,622
- 38,178
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- 32,834
- 81,404
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2013
We're still doing this with the ACA? When will it end?
- 20,415
- 10,332
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
Rotten biblethumping scum back at it again.
All you have to do in this country is find a judge who agrees with you and nothing else matters. My company won a lawsuit, and the plaintiff found some 95-year-old judge who was basically the Crypt Keeper to appeal to, and he tossed the jury's decision out. We could have appealed further, but it would have been a waste of time and money.
- 32,834
- 81,404
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2013
"I never inspired a bomb threat" is a crazy sentence to have to say
Nike Jordan
Supporter
- 33,709
- 80,417
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2002
RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
As an economist, as a liberal, and as a person that has debates, I am embarrassed for Larry Summers here.
Summers are so oblivious as to how out of touch he sounds when Stewart applies a little pressure
If you are gonna defend the Fed's actions, there is one obvious way to do it. You blame Congress
Congress can attack inflation by taxing high earners more. Then use that money to subsidize people that lose their jobs. On the aggregate, it would have a deflationary effect.
And that way the Fed doesn't need to keep interest rates so high for so long
But instead, this dude does with some bizarro combination of defending CEOs and bringing up low-income marginalized groups
I cringed when he brought up Apple and though Stewart wouldn't dare say they should charge less
Last edited:
dacomeup
Supporter
- 26,335
- 36,991
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
Trump Indicted in New York: Donald Trump Is Indicted in New York (Published 2023)
Mr. Trump will be the first former president to face criminal charges. The precise charges are not yet known, but the case is focused on a hush-money payment to a porn star during his 2016 campaign.
- 26,622
- 38,178
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
Right after Trump got rid of Weisselberg’s lawyer..Trump Indicted in New York: Donald Trump Is Indicted in New York (Published 2023)
Mr. Trump will be the first former president to face criminal charges. The precise charges are not yet known, but the case is focused on a hush-money payment to a porn star during his 2016 campaign.www.nytimes.com
If the charges and evidence are what’s already been reported, it does sound like a very tough case to win for the prosecutors.
RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
GoodTrump Indicted in New York: Donald Trump Is Indicted in New York (Published 2023)
Mr. Trump will be the first former president to face criminal charges. The precise charges are not yet known, but the case is focused on a hush-money payment to a porn star during his 2016 campaign.
Lock that thug up
- 9,413
- 20,134
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2021
This is the only article I've read about it...not really a breakdown
The 'Insanely Broad' RESTRICT Act Could Ban Much More Than Just TikTok
Digital rights experts told Motherboard the RESTRICT Act, which may be used to ban TikTok, could impact many other types of services too, including VPNs.
www.vice.com
- 26,622
- 38,178
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
Either way I would suggest people don’t get their hopes up. Regardless of whatever the strength of the case turns out to be, he’s still a rich white man with a cultist following at the end of the day.
dacomeup
Supporter
- 26,335
- 36,991
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
You think any of us are getting our hopes up after the last 8 years with this dude?
- 2,987
- 7,819
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2018
Trump tried to write off getting oral sex as paying for his guest’s meal during a campaign event.
Clinton had Monica Lewinsky but Trump had to beat the Clinton’s again.
Clinton had Monica Lewinsky but Trump had to beat the Clinton’s again.
- 91,060
- 124,917
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
Famb, I have zero confidence he faces any real consequences for any of his illegal activity
I just want to see a perp walk happen
I need a new screen saver for my office workstation
Last edited:
RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
From what I read there is no detailed breakdown because the original bill is not something ready to be passedThis is the only article I've read about it...not really a breakdown
The 'Insanely Broad' RESTRICT Act Could Ban Much More Than Just TikTok
Digital rights experts told Motherboard the RESTRICT Act, which may be used to ban TikTok, could impact many other types of services too, including VPNs.
It was just a thrown-together outline for members of the Senate to onto to show they support legislation in the area
So more symbolism than substance. That is why it is so vague
When they is the bill written for a serious floor vote, then we will get more detail a more detailed breakdown
