- 26,765
- 38,315
I don't "watch news", I read news. And it's utterly laughable to even suggest that I must only watch cable news because I questioned a Tweet from a random nobody with zero credentials or sourcing.Brb. Let me ask Biden to record a video of him announcing this while holding up two forms of ID
These Twitter accounts are news aggregators (real news from independent and foreign countries not paid for by Raytheon and CIA) Watch news outside of cnn Fox and msnbc and you’ll find that much more is happening then is reported. (Yemeni boat hit by US helicopter last night killed 10 Houthis. Yemen leader flew to Iran this morning. Statement to be released later today…) so escalation is imminent. Hence- why that above mentioned tweet is believable
I’ll be back in a few days to post the article on mainstream media once CIA approves its release.
Let’s hope cooler heads prevail. Don’t think UK would be dumb enough to officially turn red sea into war zone whereby 100% of ships won’t pass for months. At least now it’s only Israeli ships.
Edit:
UK preparing for attacks on Houthi rebels with US
The militant group has caused chaos in the Red Sea by attacking and hijacking shipswww.thetimes.co.uk
The article you edited in is actual news, and it falls far short of what that Tweet claims.
You keep talking about mainstream media this, mainstream media that, but you're the one falling for a Tweet with zero sourcing and zero credentials because it "sounds believable" to you.
Ironically you sound like the easiest puppet to manipulate. No sourcing or actual reporting needed, just a Tweet that "sounds believable."
Last edited: