- 20,041
- 9,767
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
The idea that Trump could win CA because the Hispanics are motivated is some primo comedy.
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
The idea that Trump could win CA because the Hispanics are motivated is some primo comedy.
- 6,900
- 11,446
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
dacomeup
Supporter
- 25,760
- 35,822
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
I don’t think that’s what this tweet is saying at all
- 14,348
- 34,600
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
And then you get stuck inside because something bricked the car during an automatic software update.
- 147,811
- 195,363
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- 26,044
- 37,944
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
- 960
- 3,276
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- 147,811
- 195,363
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
More of this please
- 6,900
- 11,446
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- 960
- 3,276
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- 12,173
- 21,636
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
It's about an hour before noon eastern. Where it at. Feels "What's in the vault!"-ish to me. She's retweeting the reply tweets and I dunno man. I have a few different flags for stuff like this, and this is starting to hit a few of them.
She's going to be on the Reidout and a couple of other places I'm not instantly familiar with (Deconstructed, Breaking Points) today. So I guess we'll see. She says "Yes it's political. "No it's not the pee tape".
Sounds like it's one of two things. Confirmation of an already reported story, with updated or more solid information. Or, a new but minor story that just lines up with the rest of the information already known about somebody.
Nothing means anything these days so I'm not even getting amped thinking it's something notable. Aside from 1st person violence resulting in death, nothing's a dealbreaker these days. Nothing's disqualifying. It can all be talked away, spun as someone else's fault or discussed in the upside-down as if it's a good thing and so it becomes one.
(a response like this is likely what made her say people are cynical...dunno how you can blame people for recognizing the truth of politics in 2024, but okay)
She's going to be on the Reidout and a couple of other places I'm not instantly familiar with (Deconstructed, Breaking Points) today. So I guess we'll see. She says "Yes it's political. "No it's not the pee tape".
Sounds like it's one of two things. Confirmation of an already reported story, with updated or more solid information. Or, a new but minor story that just lines up with the rest of the information already known about somebody.
Nothing means anything these days so I'm not even getting amped thinking it's something notable. Aside from 1st person violence resulting in death, nothing's a dealbreaker these days. Nothing's disqualifying. It can all be talked away, spun as someone else's fault or discussed in the upside-down as if it's a good thing and so it becomes one.
(a response like this is likely what made her say people are cynical...dunno how you can blame people for recognizing the truth of politics in 2024, but okay)
- 147,811
- 195,363
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
Someone needs to ask her if it’s the apprentice tape
- 14,348
- 34,600
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
Biden admin has discussed potentially negotiating unilateral deal with Hamas to free U.S. hostages
Such talks, if they begin, would not include Israel and would be conducted through Qatari interlocutors.
www.nbcnews.com
This deal only concerns American hostages still held by Hamas.
- 147,811
- 195,363
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- 34,450
- 26,040
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
Sinwar wants 100+ prisoners for 1 hostage.
The US doesnt hold any notable Palestinian prisoners, so any deal with Biden and Hamas wont go through
The US doesnt hold any notable Palestinian prisoners, so any deal with Biden and Hamas wont go through
- 6,900
- 11,446
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
Ya man. Apparently she is legit so we'll see
I've heard of her. She's the one who crashed an NRA convention by going through an unlocked side door, after Cancruz said only one entry for all schools after a recent school shooting (or something to that notion). Heard he was pissed!
So yeah, what she has must be good. 
- 12,173
- 21,636
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
- 12,173
- 21,636
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
Listened to the audio. Big. Fat. Nothing. The pullquotes aren't even legit. Whole story is just an attempt at eyeballs, unless there's a magic word or two that I missed that's a gotcha. He's in public, answering questions of someone at some event. Looked in the comments on twitter....feeling seems to be the same. Nothing doing. smh
- 2,605
- 6,995
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2018
No, He is suppose to interpret the constitution on new issues and in many cases work off of precedent of prior SC judges who interpreted the constitution.
The radical right on the court being mad that the liberals on the court are calling them out on this is not the problem. He complains about Americans citizens eroded belief in the court and polarization but he and Thomas are the two biggest reasons why people are loss faith in the SC.
- 147,811
- 195,363
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
sneaksoy
Supporter
- 3,248
- 2,849
- Joined
- May 11, 2007
An empirical study on the standing doctrine (something that should be politically *neutral*) found that Alito voted 100% for conservatives and 100% against progressive litigants.
100%.
He’s a purely partisan judge. He does politics, not law. Why would people believe in the Court as a neutral arbiter when its members are blatant politicians?
The sad reality, though, is that the audio above won’t do anything. The outright partisanship isn’t a secret. People have known this for years, and simply don’t care. For conservatives, this is now a feature rather than a bug. This is essentially what the Federalist Society was created to do and now, unfortunately, has quite successfully done.
We need judicial reform asap, but it’s difficult when the judiciary decides on the separation of powers and has no incentive to limit their own power in any way.
100%.
He’s a purely partisan judge. He does politics, not law. Why would people believe in the Court as a neutral arbiter when its members are blatant politicians?
The sad reality, though, is that the audio above won’t do anything. The outright partisanship isn’t a secret. People have known this for years, and simply don’t care. For conservatives, this is now a feature rather than a bug. This is essentially what the Federalist Society was created to do and now, unfortunately, has quite successfully done.
We need judicial reform asap, but it’s difficult when the judiciary decides on the separation of powers and has no incentive to limit their own power in any way.
Nike Jordan
Supporter
- 32,929
- 78,016
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2002
- 2,605
- 6,995
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2018
I honestly this can’t be as embarassing as the time he was caught on camera trying to get oral sex from a random staffer in Borat 2, or the hair dye rolling down his head from sweat, or the RICO charges, or Four Seasons landscaping, or being shunned on masked singer….. basically this level of embarrassment is just a Monday for Rudy Giuliani at this point.
- 147,811
- 195,363
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- 6,497
- 15,660
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2004
Turning functioning breaks into a premium, month to month subscription, is some of Elon’s all time greatest scamming.
After 9/11, when every mainstream publication was praising Giuliani. The Source had the best take about Rudy, he’s a crooked, racist, tyrant and fact that he’s a hero, shows how messed up this country is.
Well, they were right. That article aged like a fine wine, and all the effusive praise he got from centrist and moderate publications has aged like, well, they’ve aged like Rudy Giuliani.
The difference between Donald Trump and Yung Thug?
Yung Thug pays his lawyers.
Similar threads
