***Official Political Discussion Thread***

this election is nuts 
laugh.gif
 


thats fine, problem is him and Steve Michael moore do a better job articulating why Trump is a better choice than Hillary Clinton in their candid explanation to why Trump's appeal is what it is.
 
Last edited:
Isn't Steve Moore a pariah in the world of economists?

Yes he is.

The only well known economists that probably gets laughed at behind their backs more are Art Lafffer and Thomas Sowell.

He is not about research, or good policy, he is about pedaling ideology on behalf of rich billionaires that pay him. He has worked at the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation, well known libertarian and Conservative thinks thanks that do so well because of he well funded by people like the Koch Brothers.

People like Moore and Laffer are all in for Trump because he is willing to give their failed experiment of supply side economics another run. This time cranked up 100x

Moore is the chief architect of the Trump Tax plan that has been laughed out the room by nearly the entire field.
 
Last edited:
lit up... :lol :rolleyes smells like Clinton got a cleanup on isle 5...with 10 days left... [emoji]9203[/emoji][emoji]9760[/emoji]
 
Man conservative talk radio in Georgia is something else 
laugh.gif
 some dude called into the station and said President Obama is bisexual and Michelle Obama had a sex change 
indifferent.gif
 the guy on the show asked him how he knows and he said "you can just google it" 
indifferent.gif
roll.gif
 
Bernstein: FBI Would Not Reopen Case Unless New Evidence Was "A Real Bombshell"
39.1k Shares
Posted By Tim Hains
On Date October 28, 2016

Bernstein: FBI Would Not Reopen Case Unless New Evidence Was "A Real Bombshell"

Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein comments on the FBI's shocking Friday afternoon announcement that they are reopening the investigation into Hilary Clinton's email server because new evidence has come to light.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...unless_new_evidence_was_a_real_bombshell.html
 
Last edited:
Bernstein: FBI Would Not Reopen Case Unless New Evidence Was "A Real Bombshell"
39.1k Shares
Posted By Tim Hains
On Date October 28, 2016

Bernstein: FBI Would Not Reopen Case Unless New Evidence Was "A Real Bombshell"

Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein comments on the FBI's shocking Friday afternoon announcement that they are reopening the investigation into Hilary Clinton's email server because new evidence has come to light.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...unless_new_evidence_was_a_real_bombshell.html

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-comey-donald-trump-anthony-weiner-huma-abedin-514918

Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, said the development showed his opponent had engaged in corruption “on a scale we have never seen before,’’ while Clinton called for the FBI to release all of the information it has, saying the American people have a right to know everything.

The truth is much less explosive. There is no indication the emails in question were withheld by Clinton during the investigation, the law enforcement official told Newsweek, nor does the discovery suggest she did anything illegal. Also, none of the emails were to or from Clinton, the official said. Moreover, despite the widespread claims in the media that this development had prompted the FBI to “reopen” of the case, it did not; such investigations are never actually closed, and it is common for law enforcement to discover new information that needs to be examined.
 
Back
Top Bottom