***Official Political Discussion Thread***

http://www.newsweek.com/authors/kurt-eichenwald

go to his Twitter.....he's a defacto Hillary surrogate :lol

Hillary got no one to blame but herself.... maybe she shouldn't of deleted 33k emails that were destroyed da second they were under subpoena :rolleyes :lol

How does that make the part in bold wrong?

because you're being disingenuous in your assessment of da situation.

a criminal investigation has been resumed for Hillary Clinton and her emails ...it wouldn't of happened at this late stage unless it was serious because of da political implications.

so... Clinton gonna have to stew on that.
 
And you did not read your damb article Ninja. The headline doesn't match the content.

Here is how "bombshell" was used in context:

CARL BERNSTEIN: Well, there's no question that the e-mails have always been the greatest threat to her candidacy for president, that her conduct in regard to the e-mails is really indefensible and if there was going to be more information that came out, it was the one thing, as I said on the air last night, actually that could really perhaps affect this election.

We don't know what this means yet except that it's a real bombshell
. And it is unthinkable that the Director of the FBI would take this action lightly, that he would put this letter forth to the Congress of the United States saying there is more information out there about classified e-mails and call it to the attention of congress unless it was something requiring serious investigation. So that's where we are...

Is it a certainty that we won't learn before the election? I'm not sure it's a certainty we won't learn before the election.

One thing is, it's possible that Hillary Clinton might want to on her own initiative talk to the FBI and find out what she can, and if she chooses to let the American people know what she thinks or knows is going on. People need to hear from her...

I think if she has information available to her from the FBI or any other source as to her knowledge of what these e-mails might be, hopefully she will let us know what they are and what is under discussion here.

Right now we're all talking in a vacuum but I want to add here that in the last, oh, 36, 48 hours, there has been an undercurrent of kind of speculative discussion among some national security people that something might surface in the next few days about e-mails, and I think the expectation in this chatter -- and I took it as just chatter but informed chatter, to some extent -- was that it would relate to another round of WikiLeaks e-mails, which our Justice Department people seem to be saying is not the case, but there has been some noise in the national security community the last day or two of this kind of possibility of some kind of revelation.

But this is her achilles heel and we have to remember that it also comes on the -- back to the word heel -- of the revelations about the Clinton Foundation. So the confluence of all of this is bad for her as it stands now but with some knowledge she might be able to stop, turn things around, and give us some idea of what's going on in a way we might not otherwise know, and also it's very possible that some members of congress very quickly are going to get an idea of what these e-mails are, and what this is all about, and for whatever purpose put some information out there.

He is saying Comey's letter is the bombshell. Not some contents in the emails.

Seems like both you, and the person that wrote this headline, never took the time to the Bernstein's actual words.
 
here's another quote in da same article that renders your point moot.

I think if she has information available to her from the FBI or any other source as to her knowledge of what these e-mails might be, hopefully she will let us know what they are and what is under discussion here

she wants to be transparent? release em yourself.
 
http://www.newsweek.com/authors/kurt-eichenwald

go to his Twitter.....he's a defacto Hillary surrogate :lol

Hillary got no one to blame but herself.... maybe she shouldn't of deleted 33k emails that were destroyed da second they were under subpoena :rolleyes :lol

How does that make the part in bold wrong?

because you're being disingenuous in your assessment of da situation.

a criminal investigation has been resumed for Hillary Clinton and her emails ...it wouldn't of happened at this late stage unless it was serious because of da political implications.

so... Clinton gonna have to stew on that.

Ahhh the goalpost move and conjecture.

Comey has not idea what is even in those emails. But of course, it must be something serious.
 
here's another quote in da same article that renders your point moot.

I think if she has information available to her from the FBI or any other source as to her knowledge of what these e-mails might be, hopefully she will let us know what they are and what is under discussion here

she wants to be transparent? release em yourself.

incase u missed it.
 
here's another quote in da same article that renders your point moot.

I think if she has information available to her from the FBI or any other source as to her knowledge of what these e-mails might be, hopefully she will let us know what they are and what is under discussion here

she wants to be transparent? release em yourself.

My god, you are so simple sometimes.

How the hell is she suppose to know exactly what Huma and Weiner did on your computer regarding her?

-Edit: Making a post and quoting yourself right away doesn't reinforce your point. It just looks stupid
 
Last edited:
Since you already admitted you finances are on struggle. You want us to start a GoFundMe to get you one of them dolls pa?
 
Last edited:
here's another quote in da same article that renders your point moot.

I think if she has information available to her from the FBI or any other source as to her knowledge of what these e-mails might be, hopefully she will let us know what they are and what is under discussion here

she wants to be transparent? release em yourself.

My god, you are so simple.

How the hell is she suppose to know exactly what Huma and Weiner did on your computer regarding her?

she was asked DIRECTLY if she spoke to Huma at her press conference yesterday and she dodged da question... [emoji]128133[/emoji]

like i said, she wants transparency? she should've never deleteled her E-mails via Bleach bit in da first place to arouse this type of scrutiny. its her fault period.
 
1000


I just filled out my ballot. However, there needs to be a full investigation as to who will receive this ballot... where is it actually headed!
 
Video really is hilarious.

Taking soundbites from rap artist on their opinion on why trump is popular with his base.

People in the hood definitely ain't voting for da donald :lol
 
Back
Top Bottom