I never said the policy was good, what I'm saying is at least all of us in this thread can remember what they actually are running on, whether we agree with it or not and no matter how crazy it is.
The Dems didn't run on any policy that was memorable except women's reproduction rights, which to be honest, is an issue that white suburban women care about more than most minorities
What are you talking about?
In addition to abortion access and IVF (policies under threat by Reps), she also ran on providing support for first-time homebuyers, expanding M4A, and reducing the cost of childcare. In addition to that, I know she won't threaten to end policies like the CHIPS act, which is making the US competitive in a critical area of competition in this century, or the infrastructure bill, which is creating jobs for folks without college degrees.
Did I mention that she won't sell us out to foreign leaders who want to undo the alliances on which our economic system (and your relative prosperity) rests? Should ask how those soybean farmers are doing today?
Deporting people won't automatically give jobs to the jobless; we saw it with the rotting fields of crops during the first Trump administration. This was happening despite farmers offering top dollar to Americans for backbreaking work.
There are more uninhabited houses than there are homeless people, so what is taking more people out of the country going to do for the homeless that can't be done today?
At some point people just have to admit that they are indifferent to everything else they're going to get with Trump. And if he wins, they shouldn't be surprised when they ask for help and the first question they are asked to answer is, "who did you vote for?" and are treated accordingly.