While I can understand the intrigue of conversations like this because it gives people an avenue to air grievances (and it’s good for tv ratings), If men, the drivers of the work force, heads of households, entrepreneurs, movers of the economy can’t be pitched on an economic platform with plans to bolster homeownership, worker empowerment, tax benefits and an over all better economic environment and foothold for us and our families, there was no messaging that was going to work. If the response to not “feeling” “talked to” is to let Trump win, what could the Harris campaign possibly have done?
This unserious, BARELY critical media environment has contributed so much to why this election played out the way it did. They only care about televising heated exchanges. Thats why people fein ignorance about policy
At some point the conversation needs to shift to why expanding the child tax credit wasn’t good messaging? Why wasn’t tax policy focused middle/working class good messaging? Why was lowering the barrier to start a small business not good messaging? Why wasn’t keeping the cost of necessities not good messaging? For men, and particular for black men? But concepts of a plan is the move? This isn’t a messaging issue. Maybe folks issue is with the messenger, but people done want to be attacked for what they believe right?