***Official Political Discussion Thread***

lol That is why I dig my President so much! What he is really saying without offending anyone is, " I have access to all of Castro's FBI and CIA files, know of all of his movements, and when I do not look at them through a white imperialists perspective, Fidel was not that bad of a guy, but I could see why white people disliked him. He didn't bow down." On top of that, you have the incoming President lauding Putin. So much for communists being the enemy...[emoji]128064[/emoji]

Why don't you look at it from the perspective of a human being and really think about Castro? Batista wasn't the best, but that doesn't give Castro a reason to instill a authoritarian regime
 
Last edited:
ninja's distaste for fidel is laughable because he supports a person who is friends with putin :lol laughable
 
lol That is why I dig my President so much! What he is really saying without offending anyone is, " I have access to all of Castro's FBI and CIA files, know of all of his movements, and when I do not look at them through a white imperialists perspective, Fidel was not that bad of a guy, but I could see why white people disliked him. He didn't bow down." On top of that, you have the incoming President lauding Putin. So much for communists being the enemy...

"Fidel was not that bad of a guy" despite his countless atrocities and human rights violations

You are turning a blind eye to the evil he was responsible for in favor of upholding your "enemy of my enemy" mentality

Opposition to imperialism doesn't make a person wholly admirable by default
 
"Fidel was not that bad of a guy" despite his countless atrocities and human rights violations

You are turning a blind eye to the evil he was responsible for in favor of upholding your "enemy of my enemy" mentality

Opposition to imperialism doesn't make a person wholly admirable by default

like another poster said. everyone has dirt on their hands especially when you rise to power. eventually you become everything you fought against. castro is the perfect example.
 
@realDonaldTrump: In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally
2242440
 
like another poster said. everyone has dirt on their hands especially when you rise to power. eventually you become everything you fought against. castro is the perfect example.

Right...a whole lot of awful people have noble origins
 
California, the place that has millions of illegals also allows them to get driver's licenses at the DMV where you can also register to vote. It also takes a month to finalize vote there. There is likely to be foul play in CA just not in the millions as suggested.

He's alleging that at least 2% of ballots were cast by illegals.
 
California, the place that has millions of illegals also allows them to get driver's licenses at the DMV where you can also register to vote. It also takes a month to finalize vote there. There is likely to be foul play in CA just not in the millions as suggested.

He's alleging that at least 2% of ballots were cast by illegals.

You making yourself sound like a complete clown with the amount of ignorance and diet bigotry you are spewing.

-And when it comes to fair elections, I never hear people like you complain about the suppression of black voters, in southern and swing states. Not a ******* peep about that blatant disenfranchisement of voters, just because they vote Democrat.

Miss this thread with your bull ****
 
Last edited:
You know what I've never been convinced Trump was working some grand strategy but at this point I have to be.


Every time, there is a real controversy like the reports on how he is going to profit from the presidency, he distracts with some insane tweet ginning up fake controversy for cable news to cover.

Don't be fooled.
 
Last edited:
Why don't you look at it from the perspective of a human being and really think about Castro? Batista wasn't the best, but that doesn't give Castro a reason to instill a authoritarian regime
So people who do not share your perspective are not human? I disagree with you, call me what you want, it is what I answer to. Looking at history, reading and then understanding what Castro knew, what he fought against, yeah. There are dirty hands everywhere. However, Meyer Lansky would have turned the whole damned country into a playground for whites only, with Batista cosigning it. Castro did what he had to do, considering the options. One of the things I admire most was his stance against the Catholic church. So again, while he was far from perfect, I love the fact that he took a stand against white privilege and its mechanisms.
"Fidel was not that bad of a guy" despite his countless atrocities and human rights violations

You are turning a blind eye to the evil he was responsible for in favor of upholding your "enemy of my enemy" mentality

Opposition to imperialism doesn't make a person wholly admirable by default
I admire his stand against the catholic church and their mechanisms that bring about white privilege. I also do not trust western media's accounts of what he supposedly did, especially with all of the hell that was raised when my President, Obama, said that he would consider trade with Cuba when he first got into office. Since it is a fact that western media does view leaders who are non white differently, I am very careful take anything they report as truth, because they even went after Mandela as if he were a terrorist. We know how this thing works, and a black or latino man in charge cannot do wrong right. according to those who live with white privilege.
 
Last edited:
[h1]  Three Wisconsin Counties Just Admitted They Padded Trump’s Win With Fake Votes[/h1]
The presidential election of 2016 was the most contentious and bizarre in American history. On top of the vile rhetoric that was spewed by now President-elect Donald Trump, it now appears that certain voting tallies in Wisconsin were hedged in Trump’s favor.

A county in Wisconsin named Outagamie County had four precincts in the areas of Cicero, Grand Chute, Bear Creek, and Hortonville which all showed that they had fewer people overall than had voted in the presidential election. This instance, naturally, caused the Internet to fly in a fury claiming, rightly, that voter fraud was taking place. The precincts quickly adjusted their voting totals, which removed over a thousand votes from Donald Trump’s side. What a coincidence, the party which has spent years decrying voter fraud were once again benefiting from voter fraud. Dan Solomon of Fast Company was the first to point this out:

The village clerk of Hortonville, Lynn Mischkerm offered an explanation to the discrepancy, which didn’t make much sense at the time and under further analysis was proved to be a falsehood. She said:

In order to give election returns to the Outagamie County Clerk’s office as quickly as possible the Chief Inspector added together the votes from the election machine tapes. An error was made while keying the numbers on the calculator during this process resulting in an incorrect number of votes reported on Election night. The official process of tallying the votes was completed and rechecked. These vote numbers were recorded and delivered to the Outagamie County Clerk’s office the morning of November 9th. The official tally reflects the accurate votes in the Village.

To accept this story from Mischkerm one would have to believe that the same error was made in four different counties, and that same error resulted in Donald Trump receiving more votes in each instance. Another conundrum is Hillary Clinton’s vote total did not change before the original numbers were announced, or after they were adjusted due to the Internet’s outrage.

The point to take away from this entire voting debacle in these little Wisconsin towns is the voter fraud was uncovered because they lazily attempted to give Trump an edge and did not anticipate their villainy being discovered. In other areas of the nation it is entirely possible that similar scenarios transpired, and the individuals involved were smoother in covering their tracks. Therefore it is vitally important for voting recounts to happen across the nation to sort out any other discrepancies which took place. The recounts may well prove that not only did Hillary Clinton win the popular vote, but that she also won the electoral college. The American people are owed, and deserve, fairness in their elections for the sake of the sanctity of the American republic.
http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/11/...s-just-admitted-padded-trumps-win-fake-votes/
 
You making yourself sound like a complete clown with the amount of ignorance and diet bigotry you are spewing.

-And when it comes to fair elections, I never hear people like you complain about the suppression of black voters, in southern and swing states. Not a ******* peep about that blatant disenfranchisement of voters, just because they vote Democrat.

Miss this thread with your bull ****

You're acting like it's difficult to get a government ID. You don't have a problem when the left gerrymandering districts to skew elections in their favor.

If you really have a problem with me, I'm in NYC and have this week off. Let me know what you want to do.
 
This recount stuff just gets weirder and weirder :lol

You know what I've never been convinced Trump was working some grand strategy but at this point I have to be.


Every time, there is a real controversy like the reports on how he is going to profit from the presidency, he distracts with some insane tweet ginning up fake controversy for cable news to cover.

Don't be fooled.

I've also been suspecting this,he's been tweeting all day the day after the NYT dropped this big,in depth piece on his potential unprecedented conflicts of interest...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/us/politics/donald-trump-international-business.html
 
Last edited:
[QUOTE url="[URL]http://niketalk.com/content/type/61/id/2242480/[/URL]"]
[h1] Three Wisconsin Counties Just Admitted They Padded Trump’s Win With Fake Votes[/h1]

 

The presidential election of 2016 was the most contentious and bizarre in American history. On top of the vile rhetoric that was spewed by now President-elect Donald Trump, it now appears that certain voting tallies in Wisconsin were hedged in Trump’s favor.

A county in Wisconsin named Outagamie County had four precincts in the areas of Cicero, Grand Chute, Bear Creek, and Hortonville which all showed that they had fewer people overall than had voted in the presidential election. This instance, naturally, caused the Internet to fly in a fury claiming, rightly, that voter fraud was taking place. The precincts quickly adjusted their voting totals, which removed over a thousand votes from Donald Trump’s side. What a coincidence, the party which has spent years decrying voter fraud were once again benefiting from voter fraud. Dan Solomon of Fast Company was the first to point this out:




The village clerk of Hortonville, Lynn Mischkerm offered an explanation to the discrepancy, which didn’t make much sense at the time and under further analysis was proved to be a falsehood. She said:

In order to give election returns to the Outagamie County Clerk’s office as quickly as possible the Chief Inspector added together the votes from the election machine tapes. An error was made while keying the numbers on the calculator during this process resulting in an incorrect number of votes reported on Election night. The official process of tallying the votes was completed and rechecked. These vote numbers were recorded and delivered to the Outagamie County Clerk’s office the morning of November 9th. The official tally reflects the accurate votes in the Village.

To accept this story from Mischkerm one would have to believe that the same error was made in four different counties, and that same error resulted in Donald Trump receiving more votes in each instance. Another conundrum is Hillary Clinton’s vote total did not change before the original numbers were announced, or after they were adjusted due to the Internet’s outrage.

The point to take away from this entire voting debacle in these little Wisconsin towns is the voter fraud was uncovered because they lazily attempted to give Trump an edge and did not anticipate their villainy being discovered. In other areas of the nation it is entirely possible that similar scenarios transpired, and the individuals involved were smoother in covering their tracks. Therefore it is vitally important for voting recounts to happen across the nation to sort out any other discrepancies which took place. The recounts may well prove that not only did Hillary Clinton win the popular vote, but that she also won the electoral college. The American people are owed, and deserve, fairness in their elections for the sake of the sanctity of the American republic.
http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/11/...s-just-admitted-padded-trumps-win-fake-votes/
[/quote]

umm occupy democrats is a fake news site :lol

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/occupy-democrats/
 
Obama loves to talk about the right side of history but when castro dies he says "history will record and judge the enormous impact of this singular figure on the people and world around him"

Hmm... Pretty kind words. Definitely ambiguous at least.
lol That is why I dig my President so much! What he is really saying without offending anyone is, " I have access to all of Castro's FBI and CIA files, know of all of his movements, and when I do not look at them through a white imperialists perspective, Fidel was not that bad of a guy, but I could see why white people disliked him. He didn't bow down." On top of that, you have the incoming President lauding Putin. So much for communists being the enemy...[emoji]128064[/emoji]
What?

If that's what Obama is saying he's an ignorant dumbass *****.
 
Back
Top Bottom