titanium tea
Banned
- 1,663
- 940
People read their own words again.....it happens a lot in hereHe got caught up in some faulty logic and is trying to rationalize it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People read their own words again.....it happens a lot in hereHe got caught up in some faulty logic and is trying to rationalize it.
People read their own words again.....it happens a lot in here
Obama hasn't taken anywhere near as much vacation as presidents like Bush and Reagan.
No, I just wont applaud an average if not poor leader, for playing more golf and fighting more days at war than any president ever.
No, I just wont applaud an average if not poor leader, for playing more golf and fighting more days at war than any president ever.Ah. So it's only true and only a good thing when it fits your narrative then? Cute.
Basically
@ 2:35.....
But they'll just ignore the source....because Trump supporters don't believe in facts from the "mainstream media". Only the media sources trump approves of.
That's some real dictator ****
Transition questionnaire alarms Energy Department employees.
President-elect Trump’s transition team has circulated an unusual 74-point questionnaire that requests the names of all employees and contractors who have attended domestic or international climate change policy conferences, as well as emails associated with the conferences.
Continue reading the main story
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
The questionnaire appears targeted at climate science research and clean energy programs.
Document: Transition Questionnaire Raises Concerns
Energy Department employees, who shared the questionnaire with The New York Times and spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, described the questionnaire as unprecedented and worrying.
“These questions don’t just indicate an attack on civil servants here in Washington,” said an Energy Department employee. “They amount to a witch hunt in D.O.E.’s 17 national labs, where scientists have the independence to do their work — yet here are questions that are reminiscent of an inquisition rather than actual curiosity about how the labs work.”
The questionnaire asks for lists of employees involved in key climate change programs, including all those who have attended United Nations climate change conferences. It also asks for lists of employees involved in designing a metric known as the Social Cost of Carbon, a figure used by the Obama administration to measure the economic impact of carbon dioxide pollution, and to justify the economic cost of climate regulations.
It specifically asks which Energy Department programs are essential to meeting the goals of President Obama’s climate change agenda, which Mr. Trump has vowed to roll back.
It includes several questions for the Energy Information Administration, the department’s statistics office, which also measures the nation’s carbon dioxide pollution, asking for justification of its numbers.
“In the Annual Energy Outlook 2016, E.I.A. assumed that the Clean Power Plan should be in the reference case despite the fact that the reference case is based on existing laws and regulations,” the questionnaire reads. “Why did the E.I.A. make that assumption, which seems to be atypical of past forecasts?”
And it includes several questions focused on the national scientific laboratories, including queries on highest salaries, and outside evaluation of research.
Oh, this might be what Trump might've meant by draining the swamp?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-transition.html?_r=0
Transition questionnaire alarms Energy Department employees.
President-elect Trump’s transition team has circulated an unusual 74-point questionnaire that requests the names of all employees and contractors who have attended domestic or international climate change policy conferences, as well as emails associated with the conferences.
Continue reading the main story
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
The questionnaire appears targeted at climate science research and clean energy programs.
Document: Transition Questionnaire Raises Concerns
Energy Department employees, who shared the questionnaire with The New York Times and spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, described the questionnaire as unprecedented and worrying.
“These questions don’t just indicate an attack on civil servants here in Washington,” said an Energy Department employee. “They amount to a witch hunt in D.O.E.’s 17 national labs, where scientists have the independence to do their work — yet here are questions that are reminiscent of an inquisition rather than actual curiosity about how the labs work.”
The questionnaire asks for lists of employees involved in key climate change programs, including all those who have attended United Nations climate change conferences. It also asks for lists of employees involved in designing a metric known as the Social Cost of Carbon, a figure used by the Obama administration to measure the economic impact of carbon dioxide pollution, and to justify the economic cost of climate regulations.
It specifically asks which Energy Department programs are essential to meeting the goals of President Obama’s climate change agenda, which Mr. Trump has vowed to roll back.
It includes several questions for the Energy Information Administration, the department’s statistics office, which also measures the nation’s carbon dioxide pollution, asking for justification of its numbers.
“In the Annual Energy Outlook 2016, E.I.A. assumed that the Clean Power Plan should be in the reference case despite the fact that the reference case is based on existing laws and regulations,” the questionnaire reads. “Why did the E.I.A. make that assumption, which seems to be atypical of past forecasts?”
And it includes several questions focused on the national scientific laboratories, including queries on highest salaries, and outside evaluation of research.
Targeting clean up at the wrong ppl smh
They basically wanna throw out anyone who cares about the environment, it looks like
YupThey basically wanna throw out anyone who cares about the environment, it looks like
They basically wanna throw out anyone who cares about the environment, it looks like
more like anyone who subscribed to da orthodoxy of global warming when its been a politicized partisan propaganda campaign since Copenhagen emails leaked about alot of info was engineered to fit a narrative.
Eight committees investigated the allegations and published reports, finding no evidence of fraud or scientific misconduct.
The are Federal workers, civil servants, they are no politicizing anything.
Trump's people want to draw are target on the backs of folk that were either a) just doing their job b) believe they disagree with them
exactly. what i dont understand is why doesnt the government invest more in cleaner forms of energy? innovation in that field could stimulate job growth and the economy. the first nation with a handle on clean, usable energy that can be accessible would lead the industry imo
Clean energy is the future. Hustling backwards by targeting it.
Clean energy is the future. Hustling backwards by targeting it.
exactly. what i dont understand is why doesnt the government invest more in cleaner forms of energy? innovation in that field could stimulate job growth and the economy. the first nation with a handle on clean, usable energy that can be accessible would lead the industry imo
yeah thats what i dont understand. this stuff isn't gonna be around forever anyways so sooner or later we are gonna have to worry about it. might as well do something about it now while we still have a planet lolTrue story.
The Trump regime trying to stay in the past instead of diving into something new.
You're missing the big picture
Clean energy is the future. Hustling backwards by targeting it.
exactly. what i dont understand is why doesnt the government invest more in cleaner forms of energy? innovation in that field could stimulate job growth and the economy. the first nation with a handle on clean, usable energy that can be accessible would lead the industry imo
True story.
The Trump regime trying to stay in the past instead of diving into something new.
But da coal and da hemi bexactly. what i dont understand is why doesnt the government invest more in cleaner forms of energy? innovation in that field could stimulate job growth and the economy. the first nation with a handle on clean, usable energy that can be accessible would lead the industry imo
Clean energy is the future. Hustling backwards by targeting it.
Remember this is the same guy who said "them scientists can go kick rocks b" when I asked him to refute the vast majority of top scientists agreeing that climate change is a real threat. Dozens of Nobel prize winning scientists and hundreds more top scientists have condemned Trump's anti-science rhetoric. But of course da ninja knows better than all of them.Are you talking about this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
Please tell me that's the best you've got.
Have you ever read a scientific journal or even talked to a scientist in your life?
You gotta stop wasting people's time.
edit: I'm gonna guess you're a piece of work when it comes to fringe medical treatments as well.
We could have dat hemi runnin on cannoli oil bBut da coal and da hemi b