***Official Political Discussion Thread***

Yes they did, they were outchea on the campaigning trail supporting her piece of **** father. She sat in on meetings during the transition and her husband in an adviser. Their hands are dirty.


Ivanka on FDB status too.
Melania looks like her hands are forced though, she looks like the saddest human being on the planet all the time. Ol girl can't even speak English, she just wants to sell jewelry and Trump had to ruin her simple life. :lol:


I mean I suspect they are going along with it cause they have to but I bet this whole thing MIGHT be a curse for them. 

Melania spoke at the convention, is outchea saying in lawsuits that being the Frist Lady is a once in a lifetime opportunity for her to make millions, was pedaling that racist birther stuff again Obama too.

FDB she is not innocent either.



Only one that gets a pass is the lil kid.
 
Last edited:
I have to agree with not slandering Melania too much, as I've said before. I get the impression that she is not on board at all with Trump's campaign and that she seems more like her husband kinda forced her into it. Then there's the fact she's not even moving in with him in the white house. I could be entirely wrong of course but based on my own family experience, being married to a piece of **** doesn't necessarily mean you support him or even hold the same views at all. While not entirely comparable because my mom never cosigned any of the bs my dad did/said, I have to at least cut Melania some slack based on my impressions and personal experience.

Edit: Was not aware she cosigned the birther bs back then. That does change things.
 
Last edited:
Yes they did, they were outchea on the campaigning trail supporting her piece of **** father. She sat in on meetings during the transition and her husband in an adviser. Their hands are dirty.


Ivanka on FDB status too.
Melania looks like her hands are forced though, she looks like the saddest human being on the planet all the time. Ol girl can't even speak English, she just wants to sell jewelry and Trump had to ruin her simple life. :lol:


I mean I suspect they are going along with it cause they have to but I bet this whole thing MIGHT be a curse for them. 

Melania was out there trying to peddle the title of First Lady in exchange for multimillion deals. She is just as opportunistic as the rest of them.
 
I have to agree with not slandering Melania too much, as I've said before. I get the impression that she is not on board at all with Trump's campaign and that she seems more like her husband kinda forced her into it. Then there's the fact she's not even moving in with him in the white house. I could be entirely wrong of course but based on my own family experience, being married to a piece of **** doesn't necessarily mean you support him or even hold the same views at all. While not entirely comparable because my mom never cosigned any of the bs my dad did/said, I have to at least cut Melania some slack based on my impressions and personal experience. 

700


Nah, FDB
 
I have to agree with not slandering Melania too much, as I've said before. I get the impression that she is not on board at all with Trump's campaign and that she seems more like her husband kinda forced her into it. Then there's the fact she's not even moving in with him in the white house. I could be entirely wrong of course but based on my own family experience, being married to a piece of **** doesn't necessarily mean you support him or even hold the same views at all. While not entirely comparable because my mom never cosigned any of the bs my dad did/said, I have to at least cut Melania some slack based on my impressions and personal experience. 

700


Nah, FDB

Agreed, especially as a black person seeing that birther nonsense. No.
 
 
I have to agree with not slandering Melania too much, as I've said before. I get the impression that she is not on board at all with Trump's campaign and that she seems more like her husband kinda forced her into it. Then there's the fact she's not even moving in with him in the white house. I could be entirely wrong of course but based on my own family experience, being married to a piece of **** doesn't necessarily mean you support him or even hold the same views at all. While not entirely comparable because my mom never cosigned any of the bs my dad did/said, I have to at least cut Melania some slack based on my impressions and personal experience.

Edit: Was not aware she cosigned the birther bs back then. That does change things.
With how he treats people, I can easily imagine she takes an emotional beating. 
 
 

Edit: Was not aware she cosigned the birther bs back then. That does change things.
Yea that definitely does change things FDB, I hope her clothing line goes bankcrupt like Trumps businesses. It sounded like she was just parroting sh she heard from fox news and her husband but still she knew what she was doing.

700


Yes my brother, let that slander out :smokin
 
 
 
 
 
 
umm yeah you would because,



-you still can't pack da same amount of energy in storage to go anywhere far



-charging is still slow.



-battery weight to compares to a tank of gas of comparable energy is laughable right now.


Either you aren't reading or you don't understand what the words "energy" and "density" mean. 


This goes for you and your political views.


what part of "you can't pack da same amount of energy per volume in some batteries that gasoline currently enjoys" you don't understand? :lol:


there's a reason gasoline been da dominant energy source for centuries.


Your persistence in being willfully ignorant is offensive.


Boris is right, you're wrong, and that's it.
How energy efficient are electric motors compared to combustion engines?

Using contemporary technology


Brian Feldman

Brian Feldman, visionary entrepreneur - innovation consultant and robotics specialist

Written Oct 25, 2014

To expand upon Nathan Kaemingk's answer and put some numbers to it from a vehicle perspective:


Consider the Tesla Model S, which has an available 85kWh battery and a 265 mile range.


Consider a similar gas-powered car, which gets 35 mpg.


Gasoline contains about 33kwh of energy per gallon.

The Tesla uses 320 Wh/mile of energy (85kWh/265 miles)

The gas powered car uses 940 Wh/mile of energy (33kWh/35 miles)


Once the energy is onboard (not counting the efficiency of the power generation, oil refining, or charging), the Tesla is using only about a third as much energy as the comparable gasoline-powered car.


On a per mile basis, the Tesla uses less energy than a gasoline car, therefore it doesn't need high energy density fuel. Why? Because the Tesla is more efficient


Deal with it.


it doesn't matter if da engine is more efficient when it CAN'T STORE ENOUGH ENERGY to use to be more efficient :lol:


why do u think Telsa is investing on a network of charging stations? [emoji]129300[/emoji]
Same reason you have gas stations? What kind of rhetorical question was that b?

Priceless

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
Back
Top Bottom