everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
Not surprised where it leads to
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Da multiverse paradox apparently has all da libbrohemians heads spinnin to infinity and beyond, baby.
Negative dimensions? We in black holes now?
Asking for a libby friend
One thing I still don't get is HOW THE **** is Sessions allowed to be the one to interview the candidates for next FBI director who will take over the investigation he supposedly reused himself from(LOL)?!?!
Where are all the much hyped about 'checks and balances' that are supposed to uphold the rules?
One thing I still don't get is HOW THE **** is Sessions allowed to be the one to interview the candidates for next FBI director who will take over the investigation he supposedly reused himself from(LOL)?!?!
Where are all the much hyped about 'checks and balances' that are supposed to uphold the rules?
One thing I still don't get is HOW THE **** is Sessions allowed to be the one to interview the candidates for next FBI director who will take over the investigation he supposedly reused himself from(LOL)?!?!
Where are all the much hyped about 'checks and balances' that are supposed to uphold the rules?
One thing I still don't get is HOW THE **** is Sessions allowed to be the one to interview the candidates for next FBI director who will take over the investigation he supposedly reused himself from(LOL)?!?!
Where are all the much hyped about 'checks and balances' that are supposed to uphold the rules?
The mistake the founders made was to believe that ALL their descendants and all Americans would always put themselves after the wellbeing of the nation.
Ataturk knew of the propensity of men to abuse power, which is why he gave the Turkish military the power to overthrow a corrupt government, but even that didn't save their democracy.
I guess checks and balances strong enough to overcome the greed of men just don't exist.
The mistake the founders made was to believe that ALL their descendants and all Americans would always put themselves after the wellbeing of the nation.
Ataturk knew of the propensity of men to abuse power, which is why he gave the Turkish military the power to overthrow a corrupt government, but even that didn't save their democracy.
I guess checks and balances strong enough to overcome the greed of men just don't exist.
Would you include religious zealotry aka biblethumping and education in a list of threats to the US democracy? When you look at the current social climate compared to a few years ago. I'm not a US citizen of course but there seems to be a large increase of disbelief in science, statistics, ... or even pure disdain for (higher) education, science and facts. I believe biblethumping and education play the biggest role in that, with politicians' rhetoric fueling the flames.Our Republic is faced with two major pressures. One is plutocracy. Highly concentrated wealth is inimical for a Republic that wants to govern for the general good and that wants to draw on a wide variety of voices. History has shown that Republics survive and reinvigorate themselves when they periodically redistribute wealth, forgive debts and take measures to increase wages. Traditionally, this was usually done with land redistribution as was the case in Ancient Greece and Rome and America in the 19th century. Without those distributions, Oligarchy grows and grows and your Republic will have a violent revolution or, much more likely, the oligarchy grows to the point that your society is a monarchy, in deed if not in name.
The other stressor is demographics and white supremacy. Conservatives have one guiding principle and it is the belief that wealthy, white men should rule. In the 1980's and the 1990's, they believed that a majority of the voting public was with them. In 2004, when Bush and other Republicans won a series of elections with 51% margins, conservatives talked as if we were living in 5th century Athens. They believed i na "unitary executive" and badmouthed constitutional protections for the minority Party.
Then 2008 happened and they saw that they were now the minority so they decided that they loved the Constitution and they took steps to retain power as a minority. With the election of Trump, they are becoming even more brazen in their attempts to hold power forever despite being a minority of the electorate. They want to establish an apartheid State and we have to stop them as soon as possible.
Would you include religious zealotry aka biblethumping and education in a list of threats to the US democracy? When you look at the current social climate compared to a few years ago. I'm not a US citizen of course but there seems to be a large increase of disbelief in science, statistics, ... or even pure disdain for (higher) education, science and facts. I believe biblethumping and education play the biggest role in that, with politicians' rhetoric fueling the flames.
The way things are looking now, I can only see that trend getting worse.
Obama being elected brought fourth what we are seeing now... I fear that this will be the new norm... it's all racism and classism at the root of it all...
Would you include religious zealotry aka biblethumping and education in a list of threats to the US democracy? When you look at the current social climate compared to a few years ago. I'm not a US citizen of course but there seems to be a large increase of disbelief in science, statistics, ... or even pure disdain for (higher) education, science and facts. I believe biblethumping and education play the biggest role in that, with politicians' rhetoric fueling the flames.Our Republic is faced with two major pressures. One is plutocracy. Highly concentrated wealth is inimical for a Republic that wants to govern for the general good and that wants to draw on a wide variety of voices. History has shown that Republics survive and reinvigorate themselves when they periodically redistribute wealth, forgive debts and take measures to increase wages. Traditionally, this was usually done with land redistribution as was the case in Ancient Greece and Rome and America in the 19th century. Without those distributions, Oligarchy grows and grows and your Republic will have a violent revolution or, much more likely, the oligarchy grows to the point that your society is a monarchy, in deed if not in name.
The other stressor is demographics and white supremacy. Conservatives have one guiding principle and it is the belief that wealthy, white men should rule. In the 1980's and the 1990's, they believed that a majority of the voting public was with them. In 2004, when Bush and other Republicans won a series of elections with 51% margins, conservatives talked as if we were living in 5th century Athens. They believed i na "unitary executive" and badmouthed constitutional protections for the minority Party.
Then 2008 happened and they saw that they were now the minority so they decided that they loved the Constitution and they took steps to retain power as a minority. With the election of Trump, they are becoming even more brazen in their attempts to hold power forever despite being a minority of the electorate. They want to establish an apartheid State and we have to stop them as soon as possible.
The way things are looking now, I can only see that trend getting worse.
I think this is a major issue in parts of Europe too. I'm Polish and the right, PiS, won because of their biblethumping. They have the older generation mesmerized. Funniest thing is that Poles are some of the biggest hypocrite when it comes to Catholic ideals. Sure they go to churches every Sunday but that's the extent of it.
Now I don't think Catholics are as extreme as American evangelicals, but the faithful are just as brainwashed. 16 years of catholic school (1-12 and then undergrad) has made me quite secular myself.
Marco Rubio is from Miami, the Miami Cubans don't like Cuba.
Speaking of Waterboy, he's voted in line with The Bigot[emoji]8482[/emoji] 100% since he took office.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-trump-score/marco-rubio/
Reacho A. Smith told me that Rubio was a "moderate" though.