- 11,997
- 3,286
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't vote black people..... instead buy my movies, Hidden Colors 1-4.http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/358275-trump-us-justice-system-a-laughing-stock-joke
Trump: US justice system a 'laughing stock,' 'joke'
President Trump on Wednesday referred to the U.S. justice system as a "joke" and a "laughing stock."
Speaking during a Cabinet meeting Wednesday, Trump mourned the lives lost in the attack Tuesday in New York.
He said the country needs to come up with "punishment that's far quicker and far greater than the punishment these animals are getting right now."
"They'll go through court for years. At the end, they'll be — who knows what happens. We need quick justice and we need strong justice, much quicker and much stronger than we have right now," he said.
"Because what we have right now is a joke and it's a laughing stock and no wonder so much of this stuff takes place."
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders during the Wednesday press briefing, however, disputed a reporter's characterization that the president called the system of justice in this country a "joke."
"That's not what he said," she said.
"He said the process has people calling us a joke and calling us a laughing stock."
Sanders said Trump was pointing out his frustration at "how long this process takes, how costly this process is, and particularly for someone to be a known terrorist."
"That process should move faster," she said. "That's the point he's making and that's the frustration he has."
The comments come after eight people were killed and more injured after a driver drove a truck into a bicycle path in lower Manhattan.
The alleged attacker, Sayfullo Saipov, came to the United States from Uzbekistan. Media reports following the attack indicated he may have gained entry through the diversity visa program.
Trump also said Wednesday he will ask Congress to end that immigrant visa program.
What does this even mean?
Headline: Trump: US justice system a 'laughing stock,' 'joke'
Key part of the article:
He said the country needs to come up with "punishment that's far quicker and far greater than the punishment these animals are getting right now."
"They'll go through court for years. At the end, they'll be — who knows what happens. We need quick justice and we need strong justice, much quicker and much stronger than we have right now," he said.
"Because what we have right now is a joke and it's a laughing stock and no wonder so much of this stuff takes place."
The headline is an accurate representation of what is said in the article. It also provides some additional context by adding Sanders' statements.I'm sure you know what it means
The headline is an accurate representation of what is said in the article. It also provides some additional context by adding Sanders' statements.
Enlighten us then, where do you see any issue with this article?
If that's not what Trump meant, then maybe he should think a bit more before he opens his moutth. He's the president, not some random guy on the street. Words (should) matter.
Talking about gun control after Vegas = Politicizing a tragedy
Changing immigration policies right after NYC attack = Ok?
The right, ladies and gentlemen.
The video of the event is right there in the article. The addition of SHS' comments also provide the context of the event he was commenting on as if that wasn't obvious.Reading into those statements without the context of the event he was commenting on is disingenuous.
Talking about gun control after Vegas = Politicizing a tragedy
Changing immigration policies right after NYC attack = Ok?
The right, ladies and gentlemen.
Reading into those statements without the context of the event he was commenting on is disingenuous.
Talking about gun control after Vegas = Politicizing a tragedy
Changing immigration policies right after NYC attack = Ok?
The right, ladies and gentlemen.
The video of the event is right there in the article. The addition of SHS' comments also provide the context of the event he was commenting on as if that wasn't obvious.
Did you actually read the article and watch the video or only read the headline?
Even tho he posted the link to the article that has the video of him saying these things?
Even tho the part of the artile he linked shows that the discussion was around the recent tragedy in NYC?
Yes, that's why I said "headline to substance ratio." Do you even know what you are commenting on?
I see that Donna Brazille ran out of damns in her book...
Would either of them have prevented the attack?
Do you even know what you are commenting on?
It's barely clickbait since it's exactly what Trump said.
he can, but if this fight really happens round 2 is me and him.
That's not the idea behind the post, so I must ask you...
The trumbots are hilarious.
Are you a lawyer defending someone who advocates quick, summary executions?
What is the idea? The reason most people think the gun control stuff is dumb after an attack is because there's no way to say that it would have prevented it. Murder is already illegal, but a murderer would adhere to gun laws?
Relitigating what happened to under funded state parties is good. The DNC main problem was not an rigged primary, it was fair. It was the DNC not properly funding down ticket races properly, which has costed them dearly.I'm not implying anything Donna Brazile hasn't admitted herself though,think it's a positive actually. They can focus of improving everything and making sure future primaries and elections are ran smoother and more impartially now instead of still relitigating what happened