- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,968
- 196,210
You linked a Washington Post article that states Bernie Sanders has less media coverage than the other candidates. Did you mean to prove my point? Why does it seem like you're still arguing with me?-My point is that anyone, any black person has the right to choose the preferred candidate. There are plenty of legit reason to vote for Clinton over Bernie, especially for a black person. Bernie went around campaigning with black people just like Hillary. He did it for the same reason as Hillary, yo show that the concerns of the black community is important to his campaign.
You trying to imply that Hillary's actions were disingenuous because higher profile people supported her? That proves nothing
-brah Bernie voted FOR Bill's tough on crime bill, even saying on the House flaw that the bill would hurt African Americans.
And the states he represents are one of the worst offenders of locking up black people disproportionately.
Either both get a break, both get to bring a context to explain away their actions, or both get the **** you. You can't give it to one and got the other, both those Clinton's and Sanders hands are dirty with that piece of **** legislation.
And since that is the case, both should be campaigning that they will making undoing the damage priority. Clinton did it at the start of her campaign. It took Bernie months and getting ran up on twice to finally get the message.
-Yes it is the truth. Bernie Sanders is getting the attention expect someone with his poll numbers to get. Plus the person that is stealing all the attention he could be getting is not Hillary, it is Donald Trump. LINK
-Your "voter suppression helps Hillary" argument doesn't make much sense. Voter suppression is target at mainly minorities. Hillary is winning the minority vote at by a good clip.
So if anything, the laws helped Bernie because more potential Hillary voters got turned away in the South, and they give out delegates proportionately.
The Washington Post also endorses Hillary Clinton btw.
You have a point with the crime bill but Bernie Sanders supported the part of the bill that banned assault rifles as a representative of the house. He also spoke out against the face that in disproportionately affect African Americans not for it. Vermont is 95% white. The states incarceration rate of black people reflected what was happening in the country as a whole. In spite of all of this even you support Bernie Sanders. Why?
Again, a no vote for Bernie Sanders should not equal a vote for Hillary but it did. I proposed that it had to do with the media coverage. Her support from the congressional black caucus and cases of voter suppression
I think you're argument is he is not getting his message across? Honestly I'm not sure what your argument really is lol.
-My argument is that your original post was not based on facts.
-I support Bernie Sanders because I believe that America should moved towards social democracy. People have the right to disagree with the someone and still support them, even vote for them.
And if someone doesn't want to vote for Bernie Sanders, there next best option among the major candidates is Hillary Clinton, if you go strictly by the issues.
-The WaPo article states that Bernie is getting lil coverage because that's the level of coverage a candidate in his position would get, and Trump's rise is stealing anyway any extra attention he could have gotten for his "revolution"
And the Washington Post has not endorsed Hillary Clinton.
Last edited: