Kamala Harris literrally offers nothing,
I can't even begin to imagine what potential benefit she would provide.
literally all downside.
Kamala Harris is democrat Mitt Romney.
Let's hope Kamala leaned her lesson.
just be a cop, stop tryna pretend.
You know, maybe I just need to accept Joe Biden knows more about this than me.
As I talk to older non political junkies they a seem happy with Kamala.
She might have little upside, but maybe she is the safest choice. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It's possible that Kamala is bad at stuff that political Julie's like me hate but normal people won't care about fr the VP.
Honestly man, I don't know how anyone is supposed to have read your posts today, and not come to the conclusion that you simply don't know very much about Kamala Harris.
She's been in the spotlight extensively since she arrived in Washington, even before the became a presidential nominee. The numerous times I've listened to her speak or watched her deliver questioning on a range of issues, it's been so obvious to me that she's incredibly intelligent, that she has as concrete an understanding on most domestic issues that plague this country as anyone, and that she has the knowledge and the experience to communicate the practical policy changes needed to enact the type of progressive legislation required to achieve our desired objectives.
Obviously that's only my subjective opinion of her competency. We could also cynically view everything she's ever said publicly in the past few years as a lie. We could do that with any congressional politician and be left with only their voting record in either the house or senate...
I don't know if you missed it, but her voting record was compared against the voting record of Bernie and Warren (my pick for nominee) a couple of times today. Harris' voting record is on point, beating Sander's and the equivalent of Warren's.
Now I can understand being hostile towards Harris' history as a district attorney and state attorney general just off GP. But a lot of people's criticisms about that time period lack nuance and are often misguided. People opportunistically view her past work and her net contribution (negative) to criminal justice reform through a 2020 lenses.
But I gotta reject anyone measuring her with a different yardstick. Truth is her work in San Francisco and then Sacramento was much more of a mixed bag than her detractors know or worse, are willing to be honest about. In retrospect her biggest issues were repeatedly being too reticent on police accountability and not outright disrupting the status quo.
But at the end of the day, I don't really care what yardstick we're using to measure her career work from earlier in the century. I can't understand how someone can objectively look at the last few years, where we're at right now, and not see the intrinsic worth Kamala Harris brings to any Democratic administration.
My questions for you are how does Kamala Harris offer nothing to the ticket, and hopefully the eventual administration? How is she a version of Mitt Romney? Why does she have limited upside?