***Official Political Discussion Thread***

:smh::smh::smh:




I wish nothing but the absolute worse for these people. I hope they all suffer a long and agonizing death. Done being told by some folks to "have respect" or "be nice" when it comes to these worthless clowns.

I'm missing something, what exactly are you mad about?
 

Bad example. When has "middle aged man who can't dribble or shoot" ever been disqualifying for the Knicks?

knicksside.jpg


iu


scott-brooks-of-the-new-york-knicks-passes-the-ball-circa-1997-at-picture-id471678504
 
So, it didn’t matter what the content of the “stuff” was - just that they could get something done?

That’s an odd stance to take - harm is better than inaction?

No, I specifically cited legislation such as the First Step Act and Fair Chance Act.
 
Who are you trying to convince? The participants in this thread, or you?

Anyone subscribing to observable reality is not buying this nonsense. We've been over this many times.

What was Trump going to "get past [sic] through an obstructive GOP-led Senate?" The "criminal justice reforms" he ran on in 2016 were NATIONWIDE STOP AND FRISK and racist immigration restrictions.

Donald Trump vetoed a defense spending bill passed by the "GOP-led Senate" to protect CONFEDERATE base names.

So much for that "theory."


If you want slightly more honesty about this:


Let's state the obvious here: this was about reducing your tax obligations, first and foremost. (Even that is dishonestly framed as faux-concern for the working class, who were so obviously not the primary beneficiary class of the legislation: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/10/06/opinion/income-tax-rate-wealthy.html )

Stop trying to play it off like you did this to advance criminal justice reform. Tell that to Brandon Bernard.


The legislation im speaking of is the first step act and potential second step act.

And past the otherwise obstructive GOP-led senate to the president’s desk, not “passed” but cool sic.

As I said before, 2016 was a rebuke a Clinton. One person had a record in office and the other didn’t.

You want to flip the narrative to me supporting Trump in 2016 for criminal justice reform. But It’s a red herring.

In any event, I’m for flipping the Senate now. Hopefully Biden can get some of his great proposals enacted.
 
The legislation im speaking of is the first step act and potential second step act.

And past the otherwise obstructive GOP-led senate to the president’s desk, not “passed” but cool sic.

As I said before, 2016 was a rebuke a Clinton. One person had a record in office and the other didn’t.

You want to flip the narrative to me supporting Trump in 2016 for criminal justice reform. But It’s a red herring.

In any event, I’m for flipping the Senate now. Hopefully Biden can get some of his great proposals enacted.
The irony.
 
Back
Top Bottom