lobotomybeats
Supporter
- 9,202
- 18,624
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There were very fine people on both sides.Ironically the police officer who was bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher by Trump Supporters was himself a huge Trump Supporter.
Brian Sicknick: DC Police Officer Dies After Injuries at Capitol Riot
Brian Sicknick has been identified as the Capitol Police officer who died after suffering injuries during a pro-Trump riot in Washington, D.C.heavy.com
Twitter, Facebook, Google, and Apple are doing damage control.I completely agree his Tweets violate their terms of service and I agree they should suspend/ban his Twitter. But there are literally despots who post propaganda on there all day.
Regimes and people who slaughter people for being gay, political opposition, etc. That tweet I posted from the official website of the Chinese embassy in the US, posted how putting a million Muslims in concentration camps is good for them.
They let those accounts stay up but they ban Trump’s. You can’t have it both ways and be selectively outraged. I despise Trump with a passion but there are a lot worse actors out there who are allowed to roam Twitter freely.
It’s playing right into his narrative of being targeted and he has a point. Did Twitter do the right thing? Yes but they can’t be selectively outraged
TLDR
- clean up the entire platform
Trump finna have Baron's Animal Crossing account jumpin in a minute
Freedom of speech was written at a point in time where it’s not relevant in today’s time with our current capabilities. With that said, there’s no regulating speech, doesn’t work. Only thing you can do is shut them off or shut the platform down.I completely agree his Tweets violate their terms of service and I agree they should suspend/ban his Twitter. But there are literally despots who post propaganda on there all day.
Regimes and people who slaughter people for being gay, political opposition, etc. That tweet I posted from the official website of the Chinese embassy in the US, posted how putting a million Muslims in concentration camps is good for them.
They let those accounts stay up but they ban Trump’s. You can’t have it both ways and be selectively outraged. I despise Trump with a passion but there are a lot worse actors out there who are allowed to roam Twitter freely.
It’s playing right into his narrative of being targeted and he has a point. Did Twitter do the right thing? Yes but they can’t be selectively outraged
TLDR
- clean up the entire platform
Hillary Clinton is somewhere in upstate New York laughing her *** off right now
Speaking of himIt’s just like when ninja got banned
guess u missed how he ran his campaign
da political ethos is changed forever.
political correctness is relegated to da dustbin of society
Hillary Clinton is somewhere in upstate New York laughing her *** off right now
Jokes aside this will happen. Trump is going to throw those ads like they used to have to send a quarter a day to help a kid in Africa buy water
Broadly speaking, I’m sympathetic to argument that Federal, State and local officials should respect the spirit of the Bill of rights and that if that means constraining private sector actors and or spending tax payers dollars, so be it. The right to privacy should include constraints on your employer. The right to legal counsel should include a very well funded public defender’s office.
Unfortunately, the folks who want blanket immunity for Trump’s posting do not actually believe in an expanded and radically reimagined bill of rights. Stop saying it’s about expanding the 1st amendment.
Free speech but take Harry Potter out of public schools because it’s made by the devilYou know what's funny about these Republicans crying about "free speech" when corporate America / book publishers refuse to allow them access or to publish their books?
The 1st Amendment refers to Congress, not corporate America.
You'd think a group of people that are so fixated on "free markets" and "capitalism" would have a clue...but as usual what they know and don't know is strictly contingent on what is beneficial for them.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Last I checked, the legislative branch of the United States government isn't called Facebook or Twitter.
Ever heard those "christian" bozos who talk about being oppressed while living in a town with churches on every corner?Free speech but take Harry Potter out of public schools because it’s made by the devil
I am speaking more to the broad issue as it relates to the very large platforms like twitter and facebook and the scope of their powers. It is certainly going to be interesting to see this area of the law develop.