- 1,296
- 11
BTW, the taxpayer is sooooooo screwed in regards to this bank plan. Sooooooooo many loopholes, especially if banks and funds work in tandem with each other.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by reigndrop
BTW, the taxpayer is sooooooo screwed in regards to this bank plan. Sooooooooo many loopholes, especially if banks and funds work in tandem with each other.
Originally Posted by cguy610
Originally Posted by reigndrop
BTW, the taxpayer is sooooooo screwed in regards to this bank plan. Sooooooooo many loopholes, especially if banks and funds work in tandem with each other.
The taxpayer is screwed regardless. Unemployed people are going to end up receiving unemployment benefits and welfare.
Originally Posted by wawaweewa
Originally Posted by cguy610
Originally Posted by reigndrop
BTW, the taxpayer is sooooooo screwed in regards to this bank plan. Sooooooooo many loopholes, especially if banks and funds work in tandem with each other.
The taxpayer is screwed regardless. Unemployed people are going to end up receiving unemployment benefits and welfare.
Unemployment benefits and welfare come nowhere close to the money that the banks have gotten so far.
Upwards of $11 trillion.
Which can be translated to be at least $20 trillion. Fractional Reserve BankingOriginally Posted by wawaweewa
Originally Posted by cguy610
Originally Posted by reigndrop
BTW, the taxpayer is sooooooo screwed in regards to this bank plan. Sooooooooo many loopholes, especially if banks and funds work in tandem with each other.
The taxpayer is screwed regardless. Unemployed people are going to end up receiving unemployment benefits and welfare.
Unemployment benefits and welfare come nowhere close to the money that the banks have gotten so far.
Upwards of $11 trillion.
while i agree that the tax payer is taking the brunt of this rescue package, aren't banks, hedgefunds and SIV's pools of private capital?While the fund managers and prop traders get rich regardless, if they do well couldn't this mean better, safer returns for pension funds, 401k's etc?This should be good for peoples portfolios.(In theoryOriginally Posted by reigndrop
BTW, the taxpayer is sooooooo screwed in regards to this bank plan. Sooooooooo many loopholes, especially if banks and funds work in tandem with each other.
All fail at once?Originally Posted by cguy610
Originally Posted by wawaweewa
Originally Posted by cguy610
Originally Posted by reigndrop
BTW, the taxpayer is sooooooo screwed in regards to this bank plan. Sooooooooo many loopholes, especially if banks and funds work in tandem with each other.
The taxpayer is screwed regardless. Unemployed people are going to end up receiving unemployment benefits and welfare.
Unemployment benefits and welfare come nowhere close to the money that the banks have gotten so far.
Upwards of $11 trillion.
Unemployment benefits and welfare increase dramatically when the banks are all allowed to fail at once. In addition to the reduction in tax revenues.
Originally Posted by wawaweewa
All fail at once?Originally Posted by cguy610
Unemployment benefits and welfare increase dramatically when the banks are all allowed to fail at once. In addition to the reduction in tax revenues.
Not all banks are insolvent. A great number of the major banks are insolvent but there would still be a banking system if the pos ones were allowed to go. BAC (as well as USB) would be the biggest solvent bank if that idiot Lewis wasn't bamboozled and blackmailed into acquiring Merryl. Honestly the shareholders should press criminal charges on Lewis, Bernanke, and Paulson for that.
Furthermore, the banks are now being payed to store the liquidity that they were given by the Fed. How do you like that for tax revenues.
Originally Posted by andycrazn
there was a correction on gold today hopefully it drops more. copped a krugerrand for 900 today! gonna try to get more at this price
Let's see.Originally Posted by cguy610
Originally Posted by wawaweewa
All fail at once?Originally Posted by cguy610
Unemployment benefits and welfare increase dramatically when the banks are all allowed to fail at once. In addition to the reduction in tax revenues.
Not all banks are insolvent. A great number of the major banks are insolvent but there would still be a banking system if the pos ones were allowed to go. BAC (as well as USB) would be the biggest solvent bank if that idiot Lewis wasn't bamboozled and blackmailed into acquiring Merryl. Honestly the shareholders should press criminal charges on Lewis, Bernanke, and Paulson for that.
Furthermore, the banks are now being payed to store the liquidity that they were given by the Fed. How do you like that for tax revenues.
the banks = a great number of banks. I would have said all banks if I meant all banks.
Regardless, the government ends up picking up the tab through all the safety nets. Do you disagree?
When the banks/funds only put in 5-10% of the capital into a certain asset/CDO and taxpayers guarantee the rest, that's bad. If the assets gosour, banks/funds will lose only the 5-10% while the taxpayers pick up the tab for rest. Losing 5-10% is something ALL banks would gladly lose to dump assetsupon somebody else.Originally Posted by 718stylez
while i agree that the tax payer is taking the brunt of this rescue package, aren't banks, hedgefunds and SIV's pools of private capital? While the fund managers and prop traders get rich regardless, if they do well couldn't this mean better, safer returns for pension funds, 401k's etc? This should be good for peoples portfolios.(In theoryOriginally Posted by reigndrop
BTW, the taxpayer is sooooooo screwed in regards to this bank plan. Sooooooooo many loopholes, especially if banks and funds work in tandem with each other.)
BTW if you guys are really into investing and want great insight into the market in real time, i'd recommed signing up for StockTwits.com. they have a great free service to speak with other investors about how they see the market. In addition, members are able to build they're reputation in the community through a track record of sound advice. this way Joe Shmoe's who know nothing don't drown out good information.
Full Disclosure: I do not work for stocktwits.
Originally Posted by LazyJ10
I don't follow GS because there's too much that goes on with them (ie - shady) but when the hell did they get $100+?? They were at ~$74 on 3.9. Isn't that like a 50% increase over the last two weeks??
The markets have never been propped up/manipulated to this extent.
How much do you want to +%%#$#! bet that the housing starts, home sales, and durable goods data get heavy revisions next month after the rally ends? just likeJanuary got huge revisions. They have completely lost all shame and are manipulating outright in the open. They are getting very bold..