- 784
- 128
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2008
i think this could be a really competitive, evenly matched series.
Official World Series Texas Rangers vs. San Francisco Giants Thread (4-1) Giants Win World Series!
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by tim lincecum,
- Start date
- 27,993
- 9,088
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
- 27,993
- 9,088
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
- 9,530
- 91
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2003
This is common knowledge though
- 9,530
- 91
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2003
This is common knowledge though
- 2,755
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2009
Originally Posted by RaWeX05
http://www.kron4.com/News/ArticleVi...eter to Keep Texas Rangers Awake/Default.aspx
The hell?
- 2,755
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2009
Originally Posted by RaWeX05
http://www.kron4.com/News/ArticleVi...eter to Keep Texas Rangers Awake/Default.aspx
The hell?
- 1,543
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
We've waited a loooong time for this one G's fans... I still remember Soloman Torres getting burned in 93 by the damn doyers - seriously this is what its like to be a diehard ha. 17 years later that day still resinates in me.
Lets just get a damn Chip... please - the bay needs this
Lets just get a damn Chip... please - the bay needs this
- 1,543
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
We've waited a loooong time for this one G's fans... I still remember Soloman Torres getting burned in 93 by the damn doyers - seriously this is what its like to be a diehard ha. 17 years later that day still resinates in me.
Lets just get a damn Chip... please - the bay needs this
Lets just get a damn Chip... please - the bay needs this
- 17,626
- 456
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- 17,626
- 456
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- 1,543
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
Originally Posted by CincoSeisDos
ha, well only 26 years for me but when I talked to Pops Saturday night and the emotion and passion in his voice - i could tell that 26 years aint nothin compared to the 56 hes been through lol
- 1,543
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
Originally Posted by CincoSeisDos
ha, well only 26 years for me but when I talked to Pops Saturday night and the emotion and passion in his voice - i could tell that 26 years aint nothin compared to the 56 hes been through lol
- 13,656
- 1,083
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
Originally Posted by LB510
Originally Posted by CincoSeisDos
Agreed, I remember when I heard Nomar got a ring just after they won the WS, I saw that Abe Alvarez also got one and he pitched maybe 6 innings tops
LB Dirtbag though so he gets a
I may have felt differently if the vote was made after the World Series if the Giants were to win it. He could go down as one of the Giants top catchers of all time. The work he's done with the pitching staff was great but him getting a ring no matter what just doesn't seem right.
Players don't vote on who gets a Championship ring. They vote on who gets a playoff share (money they get for winning each round, think of it as a bonus). If you played one game in a World Series winning teams uniform the year they win it, you are entitled to a ring. It would be bittersweet for Molina to get a ring if the Giants win. He'll accept though. Nomad has said that he doesn't like wearing the 2004 Red Sox ring for the same reason. It's like that in every sport. Players and fron office staff get a ring, some teams give out rings to suite owners. I know the Lakers distribute rings to suite owners and courtside seat owners. Even then it is still a pretty exclusive club.
- 13,656
- 1,083
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
Originally Posted by LB510
Originally Posted by CincoSeisDos
Agreed, I remember when I heard Nomar got a ring just after they won the WS, I saw that Abe Alvarez also got one and he pitched maybe 6 innings tops
LB Dirtbag though so he gets a
I may have felt differently if the vote was made after the World Series if the Giants were to win it. He could go down as one of the Giants top catchers of all time. The work he's done with the pitching staff was great but him getting a ring no matter what just doesn't seem right.
Players don't vote on who gets a Championship ring. They vote on who gets a playoff share (money they get for winning each round, think of it as a bonus). If you played one game in a World Series winning teams uniform the year they win it, you are entitled to a ring. It would be bittersweet for Molina to get a ring if the Giants win. He'll accept though. Nomad has said that he doesn't like wearing the 2004 Red Sox ring for the same reason. It's like that in every sport. Players and fron office staff get a ring, some teams give out rings to suite owners. I know the Lakers distribute rings to suite owners and courtside seat owners. Even then it is still a pretty exclusive club.
- 17,626
- 456
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
aaaaahhhhhh you're talking about a W in the series, I thought you were talking about a long time since the teams last appearance. Had me offended with the latterOriginally Posted by WstCoastGotti
Originally Posted by CincoSeisDos
ha, well only 26 years for me but when I talked to Pops Saturday night and the emotion and passion in his voice - i could tell that 26 years aint nothin compared to the 56 hes been through lol
- 17,626
- 456
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
aaaaahhhhhh you're talking about a W in the series, I thought you were talking about a long time since the teams last appearance. Had me offended with the latterOriginally Posted by WstCoastGotti
Originally Posted by CincoSeisDos
ha, well only 26 years for me but when I talked to Pops Saturday night and the emotion and passion in his voice - i could tell that 26 years aint nothin compared to the 56 hes been through lol
lightweight champion
Banned
- 13,481
- 5,271
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2007
This clown Caple tryna ruin everything!
lightweight champion
Banned
- 13,481
- 5,271
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2007
This clown Caple tryna ruin everything!
- 17,236
- 1,943
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
*Looks @ Sig*
You live there?
Can't wait for tomorrow
- 17,236
- 1,943
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
*Looks @ Sig*
You live there?
Can't wait for tomorrow
- 13,432
- 224
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
I shocked I haven't really heard many people talk about the Rangers team speed being a factor. I remember watching them against the Rays in game 5 they used there speed and aggressiveness on the bases to win game 5. I hope extra attention in paid to any runners on base.
- 13,432
- 224
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
I shocked I haven't really heard many people talk about the Rangers team speed being a factor. I remember watching them against the Rays in game 5 they used there speed and aggressiveness on the bases to win game 5. I hope extra attention in paid to any runners on base.
- 13,656
- 1,083
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
Since there are more sources than ESPN:
[table][tr][td][table][tr][td]ALCS: Rangers vs. Yankees[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][tr][td][table][tr][td]
[/td][td]Tom Verducci
The Giants live on the edge, with a run differential of +1 after 10 postseason games and six of their seven wins by one run. That's great when they're in a close game, but the Rangers have more speed and power and can create a bigger run-scoring environment. No factor, though, is more important than Cliff Lee. Don't be surprised to see him come out of the bullpen (a la Randy Johnson in 2001) to pick up key outs in Game 7.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Jon Heyman
Texas has Cliff Lee, a nice mix of speed and power and a whole lot of confidence. I don't discount the Giants, though, as I recognize their superb pitching staff, and saw their manager and magic up close in the NLCS.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Joe Posnanski
The Giants definitely seem to have some postseason magic going, but the Rangers' lineup is better and Cliff Lee is probably the overwhelming force of the series. That said, the Giants have the home-field advantage, and Matt Cain can be a difference maker. I don't have a strong feeling but I think Rangers might be a touch better.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Joe Lemire
The Giants have made the World Series with great pitching and just enough timely hits to win seven playoff games by a total of nine runs. Their starting pitching and bullpen are good enough to keep them in every game, and at some point their offense -- subpar though it is -- ought to improve a bit. Having home-field advantage robs the Rangers of a DH in four games, helping neutralize Texas' offensive advantage somewhat. The Giants will be the underdog, but they acquitted themselves just fine in that role against the Phillies and will do it again here.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Albert Chen
A close, low-scoring series will be decided by the bullpens. The Giants have the edge here, especially with Bruce Bochy's willingness to use closer Brian Wilson before the ninth innng. Without a shut down setup man (Frank Francisco's injury is big), the Rangers' bridge to Neftali Feliz is a precarious one.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Ben Reiter
The season-long development of C.J. Wilson and Colby Lewis means that the Rangers' rotation would probably have been good enough to eke past the feisty, pitching-rich Giants even if Texas GM Jon Daniels had never acquired Cliff Lee (whether the club would have gotten this far is another matter). Daniels did acquire Lee, though, and he will start Game 1 and (probably) Game 5 ?- which will represent the series-clincher for the Rangers, who have a powerful and now-healthy lineup that has produced homers in each of its 11 playoff games so far to support their terrific pitching.
RANGERS IN FIVE.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Cliff Corcoran
Yes, the Giants' pitchers shut down the powerful Phillies offense in the NLCS, but San Francisco was still out-scored in that series and has only won one game by more than a single run all postseason (a 3-0 win in Game 3 of the NLCS). Sure, they might be able to win four more games that way, but expecting them to do so against a team as good as the Rangers is folly.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Joe Sheehan
This matchup of teams stronger on the mound and in the field than they are at the plate will be a lot like the NLCS: taut games decided mostly by who gets the big extra-base hits and when. Giants manager Bruce Bochy won't be able to neutralize Rangers' slugger Nelson Cruz as easily as he did the Phillies' Ryan Howard, however, and the Rangers will pull out a classic seventh game on the road.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Tim Marchman
Betwen two teams with somewhat dubious lineups you have to take the one with better pitching, and the home-field advantage, while modest, is real. Note also that between his long layoff and his occasional trouble with free-swinging lineups, Cliff Lee may not be quite the factor it's assumed he'll be.
GIANTS IN SIX.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Stephen Cannella
The Giants will have to scramble to score, but that hasn't kept them from winning this postseason. This series comes down to run prevention, and though that's a strength for Texas, San Francisco is better. Yes, Cliff Lee will get his wins in Games 1 and 5. But the Giants -- with major help from lefty specialist Javier Lopez, who Josh Hamilton will come to dread seeing in key spots the late innings -- will figure out a way to take four of the remaining five. The victories might not be pretty, but the parade through downtown San Francisco will be.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Ted Keith
Cliff Lee has proven to be one of the best postseason pitchers in baseball history, but at least twice in this series he'll have to face the Giants' Tim Lincecum, a pretty fair pitcher in his own right. Lincecum will win one of those two games and Matt Cain, who has been exceptional at AT&T Park this season, will win two of his own, including the clincher in Game 6.
GIANTS IN SIX.[/td][/tr][/table][/td][/tr][/table][/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][/table]
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]Just to stop the "Nobody Belived in Us" train before it leaves the station.[/color]
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]Should be a pretty even Series.[/color]
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...series.experts.picks/index.html#ixzz13XO25Xgg
[table][tr][td][table][tr][td]ALCS: Rangers vs. Yankees[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][tr][td][table][tr][td]
The Giants live on the edge, with a run differential of +1 after 10 postseason games and six of their seven wins by one run. That's great when they're in a close game, but the Rangers have more speed and power and can create a bigger run-scoring environment. No factor, though, is more important than Cliff Lee. Don't be surprised to see him come out of the bullpen (a la Randy Johnson in 2001) to pick up key outs in Game 7.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Texas has Cliff Lee, a nice mix of speed and power and a whole lot of confidence. I don't discount the Giants, though, as I recognize their superb pitching staff, and saw their manager and magic up close in the NLCS.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
The Giants definitely seem to have some postseason magic going, but the Rangers' lineup is better and Cliff Lee is probably the overwhelming force of the series. That said, the Giants have the home-field advantage, and Matt Cain can be a difference maker. I don't have a strong feeling but I think Rangers might be a touch better.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
The Giants have made the World Series with great pitching and just enough timely hits to win seven playoff games by a total of nine runs. Their starting pitching and bullpen are good enough to keep them in every game, and at some point their offense -- subpar though it is -- ought to improve a bit. Having home-field advantage robs the Rangers of a DH in four games, helping neutralize Texas' offensive advantage somewhat. The Giants will be the underdog, but they acquitted themselves just fine in that role against the Phillies and will do it again here.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
A close, low-scoring series will be decided by the bullpens. The Giants have the edge here, especially with Bruce Bochy's willingness to use closer Brian Wilson before the ninth innng. Without a shut down setup man (Frank Francisco's injury is big), the Rangers' bridge to Neftali Feliz is a precarious one.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
The season-long development of C.J. Wilson and Colby Lewis means that the Rangers' rotation would probably have been good enough to eke past the feisty, pitching-rich Giants even if Texas GM Jon Daniels had never acquired Cliff Lee (whether the club would have gotten this far is another matter). Daniels did acquire Lee, though, and he will start Game 1 and (probably) Game 5 ?- which will represent the series-clincher for the Rangers, who have a powerful and now-healthy lineup that has produced homers in each of its 11 playoff games so far to support their terrific pitching.
RANGERS IN FIVE.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Yes, the Giants' pitchers shut down the powerful Phillies offense in the NLCS, but San Francisco was still out-scored in that series and has only won one game by more than a single run all postseason (a 3-0 win in Game 3 of the NLCS). Sure, they might be able to win four more games that way, but expecting them to do so against a team as good as the Rangers is folly.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
This matchup of teams stronger on the mound and in the field than they are at the plate will be a lot like the NLCS: taut games decided mostly by who gets the big extra-base hits and when. Giants manager Bruce Bochy won't be able to neutralize Rangers' slugger Nelson Cruz as easily as he did the Phillies' Ryan Howard, however, and the Rangers will pull out a classic seventh game on the road.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Betwen two teams with somewhat dubious lineups you have to take the one with better pitching, and the home-field advantage, while modest, is real. Note also that between his long layoff and his occasional trouble with free-swinging lineups, Cliff Lee may not be quite the factor it's assumed he'll be.
GIANTS IN SIX.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
The Giants will have to scramble to score, but that hasn't kept them from winning this postseason. This series comes down to run prevention, and though that's a strength for Texas, San Francisco is better. Yes, Cliff Lee will get his wins in Games 1 and 5. But the Giants -- with major help from lefty specialist Javier Lopez, who Josh Hamilton will come to dread seeing in key spots the late innings -- will figure out a way to take four of the remaining five. The victories might not be pretty, but the parade through downtown San Francisco will be.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Cliff Lee has proven to be one of the best postseason pitchers in baseball history, but at least twice in this series he'll have to face the Giants' Tim Lincecum, a pretty fair pitcher in his own right. Lincecum will win one of those two games and Matt Cain, who has been exceptional at AT&T Park this season, will win two of his own, including the clincher in Game 6.
GIANTS IN SIX.[/td][/tr][/table][/td][/tr][/table][/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][/table]
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]Just to stop the "Nobody Belived in Us" train before it leaves the station.[/color]
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]Should be a pretty even Series.[/color]
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...series.experts.picks/index.html#ixzz13XO25Xgg
- 13,656
- 1,083
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
Since there are more sources than ESPN:
[table][tr][td][table][tr][td]ALCS: Rangers vs. Yankees[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][tr][td][table][tr][td]
[/td][td]Tom Verducci
The Giants live on the edge, with a run differential of +1 after 10 postseason games and six of their seven wins by one run. That's great when they're in a close game, but the Rangers have more speed and power and can create a bigger run-scoring environment. No factor, though, is more important than Cliff Lee. Don't be surprised to see him come out of the bullpen (a la Randy Johnson in 2001) to pick up key outs in Game 7.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Jon Heyman
Texas has Cliff Lee, a nice mix of speed and power and a whole lot of confidence. I don't discount the Giants, though, as I recognize their superb pitching staff, and saw their manager and magic up close in the NLCS.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Joe Posnanski
The Giants definitely seem to have some postseason magic going, but the Rangers' lineup is better and Cliff Lee is probably the overwhelming force of the series. That said, the Giants have the home-field advantage, and Matt Cain can be a difference maker. I don't have a strong feeling but I think Rangers might be a touch better.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Joe Lemire
The Giants have made the World Series with great pitching and just enough timely hits to win seven playoff games by a total of nine runs. Their starting pitching and bullpen are good enough to keep them in every game, and at some point their offense -- subpar though it is -- ought to improve a bit. Having home-field advantage robs the Rangers of a DH in four games, helping neutralize Texas' offensive advantage somewhat. The Giants will be the underdog, but they acquitted themselves just fine in that role against the Phillies and will do it again here.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Albert Chen
A close, low-scoring series will be decided by the bullpens. The Giants have the edge here, especially with Bruce Bochy's willingness to use closer Brian Wilson before the ninth innng. Without a shut down setup man (Frank Francisco's injury is big), the Rangers' bridge to Neftali Feliz is a precarious one.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Ben Reiter
The season-long development of C.J. Wilson and Colby Lewis means that the Rangers' rotation would probably have been good enough to eke past the feisty, pitching-rich Giants even if Texas GM Jon Daniels had never acquired Cliff Lee (whether the club would have gotten this far is another matter). Daniels did acquire Lee, though, and he will start Game 1 and (probably) Game 5 ?- which will represent the series-clincher for the Rangers, who have a powerful and now-healthy lineup that has produced homers in each of its 11 playoff games so far to support their terrific pitching.
RANGERS IN FIVE.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Cliff Corcoran
Yes, the Giants' pitchers shut down the powerful Phillies offense in the NLCS, but San Francisco was still out-scored in that series and has only won one game by more than a single run all postseason (a 3-0 win in Game 3 of the NLCS). Sure, they might be able to win four more games that way, but expecting them to do so against a team as good as the Rangers is folly.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Joe Sheehan
This matchup of teams stronger on the mound and in the field than they are at the plate will be a lot like the NLCS: taut games decided mostly by who gets the big extra-base hits and when. Giants manager Bruce Bochy won't be able to neutralize Rangers' slugger Nelson Cruz as easily as he did the Phillies' Ryan Howard, however, and the Rangers will pull out a classic seventh game on the road.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Tim Marchman
Betwen two teams with somewhat dubious lineups you have to take the one with better pitching, and the home-field advantage, while modest, is real. Note also that between his long layoff and his occasional trouble with free-swinging lineups, Cliff Lee may not be quite the factor it's assumed he'll be.
GIANTS IN SIX.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Stephen Cannella
The Giants will have to scramble to score, but that hasn't kept them from winning this postseason. This series comes down to run prevention, and though that's a strength for Texas, San Francisco is better. Yes, Cliff Lee will get his wins in Games 1 and 5. But the Giants -- with major help from lefty specialist Javier Lopez, who Josh Hamilton will come to dread seeing in key spots the late innings -- will figure out a way to take four of the remaining five. The victories might not be pretty, but the parade through downtown San Francisco will be.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][td]Ted Keith
Cliff Lee has proven to be one of the best postseason pitchers in baseball history, but at least twice in this series he'll have to face the Giants' Tim Lincecum, a pretty fair pitcher in his own right. Lincecum will win one of those two games and Matt Cain, who has been exceptional at AT&T Park this season, will win two of his own, including the clincher in Game 6.
GIANTS IN SIX.[/td][/tr][/table][/td][/tr][/table][/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][/table]
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]Just to stop the "Nobody Belived in Us" train before it leaves the station.[/color]
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]Should be a pretty even Series.[/color]
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...series.experts.picks/index.html#ixzz13XO25Xgg
[table][tr][td][table][tr][td]ALCS: Rangers vs. Yankees[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][tr][td][table][tr][td]
The Giants live on the edge, with a run differential of +1 after 10 postseason games and six of their seven wins by one run. That's great when they're in a close game, but the Rangers have more speed and power and can create a bigger run-scoring environment. No factor, though, is more important than Cliff Lee. Don't be surprised to see him come out of the bullpen (a la Randy Johnson in 2001) to pick up key outs in Game 7.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Texas has Cliff Lee, a nice mix of speed and power and a whole lot of confidence. I don't discount the Giants, though, as I recognize their superb pitching staff, and saw their manager and magic up close in the NLCS.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
The Giants definitely seem to have some postseason magic going, but the Rangers' lineup is better and Cliff Lee is probably the overwhelming force of the series. That said, the Giants have the home-field advantage, and Matt Cain can be a difference maker. I don't have a strong feeling but I think Rangers might be a touch better.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
The Giants have made the World Series with great pitching and just enough timely hits to win seven playoff games by a total of nine runs. Their starting pitching and bullpen are good enough to keep them in every game, and at some point their offense -- subpar though it is -- ought to improve a bit. Having home-field advantage robs the Rangers of a DH in four games, helping neutralize Texas' offensive advantage somewhat. The Giants will be the underdog, but they acquitted themselves just fine in that role against the Phillies and will do it again here.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
A close, low-scoring series will be decided by the bullpens. The Giants have the edge here, especially with Bruce Bochy's willingness to use closer Brian Wilson before the ninth innng. Without a shut down setup man (Frank Francisco's injury is big), the Rangers' bridge to Neftali Feliz is a precarious one.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
The season-long development of C.J. Wilson and Colby Lewis means that the Rangers' rotation would probably have been good enough to eke past the feisty, pitching-rich Giants even if Texas GM Jon Daniels had never acquired Cliff Lee (whether the club would have gotten this far is another matter). Daniels did acquire Lee, though, and he will start Game 1 and (probably) Game 5 ?- which will represent the series-clincher for the Rangers, who have a powerful and now-healthy lineup that has produced homers in each of its 11 playoff games so far to support their terrific pitching.
RANGERS IN FIVE.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Yes, the Giants' pitchers shut down the powerful Phillies offense in the NLCS, but San Francisco was still out-scored in that series and has only won one game by more than a single run all postseason (a 3-0 win in Game 3 of the NLCS). Sure, they might be able to win four more games that way, but expecting them to do so against a team as good as the Rangers is folly.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
This matchup of teams stronger on the mound and in the field than they are at the plate will be a lot like the NLCS: taut games decided mostly by who gets the big extra-base hits and when. Giants manager Bruce Bochy won't be able to neutralize Rangers' slugger Nelson Cruz as easily as he did the Phillies' Ryan Howard, however, and the Rangers will pull out a classic seventh game on the road.
RANGERS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Betwen two teams with somewhat dubious lineups you have to take the one with better pitching, and the home-field advantage, while modest, is real. Note also that between his long layoff and his occasional trouble with free-swinging lineups, Cliff Lee may not be quite the factor it's assumed he'll be.
GIANTS IN SIX.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
The Giants will have to scramble to score, but that hasn't kept them from winning this postseason. This series comes down to run prevention, and though that's a strength for Texas, San Francisco is better. Yes, Cliff Lee will get his wins in Games 1 and 5. But the Giants -- with major help from lefty specialist Javier Lopez, who Josh Hamilton will come to dread seeing in key spots the late innings -- will figure out a way to take four of the remaining five. The victories might not be pretty, but the parade through downtown San Francisco will be.
GIANTS IN SEVEN.[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Cliff Lee has proven to be one of the best postseason pitchers in baseball history, but at least twice in this series he'll have to face the Giants' Tim Lincecum, a pretty fair pitcher in his own right. Lincecum will win one of those two games and Matt Cain, who has been exceptional at AT&T Park this season, will win two of his own, including the clincher in Game 6.
GIANTS IN SIX.[/td][/tr][/table][/td][/tr][/table][/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][/table]
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]Just to stop the "Nobody Belived in Us" train before it leaves the station.[/color]
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]Should be a pretty even Series.[/color]
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...series.experts.picks/index.html#ixzz13XO25Xgg