- 3,005
- 16
I picked up 2 of the 3 this past week
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Having picked up a couple more DS/near DS pairs of Vs, I've been torn lately between playing in these and some of the other new models that I've grabbed
You just can't beat this shoe... though there are better traction options these are just so damn solid for ball. I know I'm preaching to the choir. I feel like I can't pick up enough of this model
Having picked up a couple more DS/near DS pairs of Vs, I've been torn lately between playing in these and some of the other new models that I've grabbed
You just can't beat this shoe... though there are better traction options these are just so damn solid for ball. I know I'm preaching to the choir. I feel like I can't pick up enough of this model
I picked up 2 of the 3 this past week
To each his own, but I don't think they blow them out of the water -- I don't think they are that far apart. Are the 9s better in some aspects? Absolutely. But I think they are two pretty different setups and it's more of a preference thing. I wouldn't say this if I hadn't played a lot in both models. Alex I know you probably have done so as well. I had been playing in the 9s for a while and though I would take the traction on them hands down, I've been playing in the Vs again for my recent league and I feel like I move just as well, if not better in them.The V's look good, but the 9's blow them out of the water for on court performance.
You're comparing shoes that were released 5 years apart, I would hope the 9s have better on court performance with newer technology. But blow them out of the water? Nah
I also can't agree that just because a shoe is 5 years newer newer tech, it'll perform better. I haven't hopped in all Kobe models but to me the zoom 2K4 was a better performer than any of them that I've played in (which is the 5,6,8,9 fk low). On the same thought, LeBrons 1-3 played better than all his recent models except x elites.
I agree. If I had to put them in order performance wise I'd probably go;
4's
5's
9's
8's
Come on. Nike isn't selling and people aren't buying a performance shoe that wears out in a month for $160-250.No 6 no care.
While i love the 8 and 9, once the lunar is gone after a month the shoe is worthless for basketball.
5s and 6s til i die
Come on. Nike isn't selling and people aren't buying a performance shoe that wears out in a month for $160-250.
Yeah the 9 EM is solid. Just curious, why did you hate the 8s? Was the lunar too minimal? When it bottomed out the shoe was definitely hard to play in... not easy on the joints/back/etcPersonally, I have always held the V's as the best, with the 6's a close second.
I played in and hated the 8's. That caused me to not give the 9's a chance, because I figured similar setup, similar performance. That was until a few weeks ago when I tried the 9 EM low.
While I still rate the V as the best, the 9's are now a close second. Bumped the 6's to third for me.
Now, not only do I hunt for more V's, I am playing catch up with the 9's.
Yeah the 9 EM is solid. Just curious, why did you hate the 8s? Was the lunar too minimal? When it bottomed out the shoe was definitely hard to play in... not easy on the joints/back/etc