Oh I'm sorry, Did I Break Your Conversation........Well Allow Me A Movie Thread by S&T

Nah, dude has hits.

That's true, but most of them were made in the 90s. His stuff in the 2000s has mostly been just ok to bad, at least in my opinion. I know that his Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and Alice in Wonderland movies made pretty good money, but I didn't think either was all that good. But, hey, maybe he got his touch back with Miss Peregrine's.
 
Oh wow, I knew Leo accidentally cut his hand but did not know that was his real blood he put on Kerry :lol :x

Did not know TLJ's "I don't care" was adlibbed.
 
That's not his real blood. QT had some made. Leo and Kerry came up with it, but it was not actual blood, no way he would do that.
 
Prove it.

Sources? 8o

I just Googled it and there are a bunch of reports out there that it is real and some that say it isn't. The most recent stuff I saw was on Reddit and it said the blood is fake. He really did cut his hand and act out part of the scene while he was bleeding. But then they cut and that's allegedly when they came up with the idea to smear the blood on Washington's face. So, they got the fake blood and resumed shooting.

I have to say that scenario seems more plausible to me than him smearing his own, real blood on someone's face without getting permission first.
 
That's not his real blood. QT had some made. Leo and Kerry came up with it, but it was not actual blood, no way he would do that.

Prove it.

Sources? 8o
So he cut his hand, kept acting, then they cut, came up with the idea, and then fixed his hand while QT got fake blood?

Hard to believe man. As disgusting as it sounds, until proven wrong with facts (QT, Leo, anyone from set saying otherwise), I believe he continued on with real blood from his real cut.

Again, i could be completely wrong, but Kerry Washington's face had "w.t.f" written all over it.
She looked shocked and disgusted.

It was either INCREDIBLE improved acting on her part after QT set up the fake blood, or real disgust and shock.
Idk, i guess we'll all have our belief on the matter its a coin flip :lol
 
That's not his real blood. QT had some made. Leo and Kerry came up with it, but it was not actual blood, no way he would do that.

Prove it.

Sources? 8o
So he cut his hand, kept acting, then they cut, came up with the idea, and then fixed his hand while QT got fake blood?

Hard to believe man. As disgusting as it sounds, until proven wrong with facts (QT, Leo, anyone from set saying otherwise), I believe he continued on with real blood from his real cut.

Again, i could be completely wrong, but Kerry Washington's face had "w.t.f" written all over it.
She looked shocked and disgusted.

It was either INCREDIBLE improved acting on her part after QT set up the fake blood, or real disgust and shock.
Idk, i guess we'll all have our belief on the matter its a coin flip :lol

Think logically folks.

You think a respectable person like Leo is going to rub his BLOOD, IN HER FACE? Or that she would sit there and not immediately go crazy on him for that? :lol I'm not talking looking disgusted, I'm talking he puts her life in danger rubbing his own blood all over her face. That's no joking matter. Of course she LOOKS disgusted, she's acting. If it was real life, she would come unglued. And Leo is not going to be so stupid as to risk something like that.

He cut his hand. He finished the scene. They applauded him when the scene was finished. Leo and Washington themselves came up with the idea, QT got some fake blood ( you know he had some somewhere :lol ) and they incorporated it into the scene. FAKE blood is rubbed into her face. There is ZERO chance he would do that to her with his own real blood, c'mon.
 
Taken from IMDB: "When Leonardo DiCaprio's character Calvin Candie smashes his hand on the dinner table, the actor accidentally crushed a small stemmed glass with his palm and really began to bleed. DiCaprio ignored it, stayed in character, and continued with the scene. Tarantino was so impressed that he used this take in the final print, and when he called cut, the room erupted in a standing ovation. DiCaprio's hand was bandaged and he suggested the idea of smearing blood onto the face of Kerry Washington. Tarantino and Washington both liked this, so Tarantino got some fake blood together."
 
tumblr_mer1zlWXa91rgejpco1_500.gif
 
I could've believed its real blood simply cuz of how far I've seen great actors go even to extremes even with use of blood.

I mean Waltz willingly got spat on for dozens of takes in that Kong movie.
 
Only actor I would have believed would rub his own blood and not come out of character would be Daniel day Lewis. That man doesn't come out of character until the DVD commentary
 
RDJR killed that role.

I have no doubt DDL could play off being a black person :lol

Sony probably did make that offer. I even saw it talked about on tv and how Hiddleston didn't have a shot. Seems they want to keep making Bond movies every 2 or 3 years.
 
Focus Features acquires new Paul Thomas Anderson film

Universal and Focus Features won a worldwide rights auction for an untitled film that Paul Thomas Anderson wrote and will direct, re-teaming him with There Will Be Blood star Daniel Day Lewis. Focus won the deal after a ferocious bidding battle with Fox Searchlight. The deal puts the lie to press reports speculating that buyer appetite has vanished going into Toronto. I’m told that Focus will finance the film’s $35 million budget on a negative pickup deal, with a big back end component for the talent. All told, the financial commitment that CAA brokered dwarfs two recent watermark worldwide rights deals at festival: the $17.5 million commitment that Searchlight made for The Birth of A Nation at Sundance last January, and the $20 million that Focus paid for the Tom Ford-directed Nocturnal Animals at Cannes 2015. The picture is set in the fashion world in London in the 1950s, and the plan is to start production early next year and release it in late 2017.

Source


2017 bouta be the goat year just based off this and Episode 8 vincecarterova.gif
 
Last edited:
^ Wow, that director is on a roll. Argo + The Town + Live By Night?

Wonder what he'll direct next?
 
Focus Features acquires new Paul Thomas Anderson film

Universal and Focus Features won a worldwide rights auction for an untitled film that Paul Thomas Anderson wrote and will direct, re-teaming him with There Will Be Blood star Daniel Day Lewis. Focus won the deal after a ferocious bidding battle with Fox Searchlight. The deal puts the lie to press reports speculating that buyer appetite has vanished going into Toronto. I’m told that Focus will finance the film’s $35 million budget on a negative pickup deal, with a big back end component for the talent. All told, the financial commitment that CAA brokered dwarfs two recent watermark worldwide rights deals at festival: the $17.5 million commitment that Searchlight made for The Birth of A Nation at Sundance last January, and the $20 million that Focus paid for the Tom Ford-directed Nocturnal Animals at Cannes 2015. The picture is set in the fashion world in London in the 1950s, and the plan is to start production early next year and release it in late 2017.

Source


2017 bouta be the goat year just based off this and Episode 8 vincecarterova.gif

I don't know what all those words mean. All I see is DDL, and PTA. I'm ******* sold if that is what the article is about
 
I don't know what all those words mean. All I see is DDL, and PTA. I'm ******* sold if that is what the article is about

It seems that's pretty much all it took to sell Universal/Focus too. Barely any mention of what the movie is about and the studio is forking over $30 million +
 
:lol I didn't realize that didn't include any description of the movie.

I posted about it back when the movie was first announced. It's a drama about the 1950s London fashion scene starring DDL :hat
 
DDL got the juice -- would love to see him do passion projects with directors he hasn't worked with yet

DDL + Nolan
DDL + Fincher
DDL + Lumet (if he was still alive)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom