- 30,295
- 21,816
My money's on Let the Right One In being the quickest remake. Not 2 damn years passed before Let Me In got released. Or are we talking strictly English speaking movies?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Fugitive is one of my all time favs.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
What's the quickest Hollywood has remade a movie?
I don't know why, but it hit me today that with all the crappy remakes out there that fare well, I'd like to think a new The Fugitive could be done right and do well.
Maybe Colin Ferrell? Russell Crowe? Have Denzel be the investigator chasing the fugitive through the whole movie?
But no, they're busy redoing Brady Bunch or something.
The Fugitive is one of my all time favs.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
What's the quickest Hollywood has remade a movie?
I don't know why, but it hit me today that with all the crappy remakes out there that fare well, I'd like to think a new The Fugitive could be done right and do well.
Maybe Colin Ferrell? Russell Crowe? Have Denzel be the investigator chasing the fugitive through the whole movie?
But no, they're busy redoing Brady Bunch or something.
[h1]Farrelly Brothers to do another "Dumb and Dumber"[/h1]
Reuters
Los Angeles -- "Dumb and Dumber" is getting dumber yet.
The Farrelly Brothers will direct a sequel to their 1994 hit -- and they plan to reunite Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels to resurrect their beloved (and dumb) roles, TheWrap has confirmed.
Sean Anders and John Morris are writing the New Line movie.
They previously wrote Carrey's 2011 movie "Mr. Popper's Penguins," 2010's "Hot Tub Time Machine" and "She's Out of My League" and 2008's "Sex Drive."
Peter and Bobby Farrelly have just completed shooting "The Three Stooges" for Fox and plan to tackle the "Dumb and Dumber" sequel next. A "Dumb and Dumber" prequel came out in 2003, but the Farrelly brothers were not intimately involved in it.
Charles B. Wessler, Brad Krevoy and Steve Stabler will produce with the Farrelly Brothers' Conundrum Entertainment partner Bradley Thomas.
[h1]Farrelly Brothers to do another "Dumb and Dumber"[/h1]
Reuters
Los Angeles -- "Dumb and Dumber" is getting dumber yet.
The Farrelly Brothers will direct a sequel to their 1994 hit -- and they plan to reunite Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels to resurrect their beloved (and dumb) roles, TheWrap has confirmed.
Sean Anders and John Morris are writing the New Line movie.
They previously wrote Carrey's 2011 movie "Mr. Popper's Penguins," 2010's "Hot Tub Time Machine" and "She's Out of My League" and 2008's "Sex Drive."
Peter and Bobby Farrelly have just completed shooting "The Three Stooges" for Fox and plan to tackle the "Dumb and Dumber" sequel next. A "Dumb and Dumber" prequel came out in 2003, but the Farrelly brothers were not intimately involved in it.
Charles B. Wessler, Brad Krevoy and Steve Stabler will produce with the Farrelly Brothers' Conundrum Entertainment partner Bradley Thomas.
Originally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm
I stopped watching Whitney. It was pretty decent, but meh...Absolutely love 2 Broke Girls, though. That show keeps getting better.
Originally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm
I stopped watching Whitney. It was pretty decent, but meh...Absolutely love 2 Broke Girls, though. That show keeps getting better.
Friend of mine here has read the book, he says that the books focuses on Alaska moreso than the journey TOO Alaska, do you agree?
That's fair to say, yes.
The book and the movie both tell generally the same story (obviously), but in different ways. Jon Krakauer's version is more... harsh, I guess, and he, as an explorer, uses Chris' story to tell ones of his own. Sean Penn's version is more celebrated and positive. Not really glorified or truth-stretching, but I think almost anybody that sees the movie, no matter how they might feel about Chris' choices, come away feeling at least a little bit sad or sympathetic. But what Krakauer does better is provide more information. More about Chris, his family, the people he met, what happened in Alaska, history of others like Chris, history about Alaska, history about the bus, etc.
I saw the movie first, too, and I'm pretty glad it happened that way, because the book can really be used as a vehicle of, again, more information. The movie probably would have been a little bit of a letdown had I read the book first. Think of the book as more of a reference piece than a story. You already know the story, but the book gives you more depth.
At face value, I prefer the movie. But just because I wanted to know as much as I could about Chris, the book provides a little bit more of that. However, I don't like Krakauer's writing style, and his personal additions just seemed out of place and unnecessary.
Friend of mine here has read the book, he says that the books focuses on Alaska moreso than the journey TOO Alaska, do you agree?
That's fair to say, yes.
The book and the movie both tell generally the same story (obviously), but in different ways. Jon Krakauer's version is more... harsh, I guess, and he, as an explorer, uses Chris' story to tell ones of his own. Sean Penn's version is more celebrated and positive. Not really glorified or truth-stretching, but I think almost anybody that sees the movie, no matter how they might feel about Chris' choices, come away feeling at least a little bit sad or sympathetic. But what Krakauer does better is provide more information. More about Chris, his family, the people he met, what happened in Alaska, history of others like Chris, history about Alaska, history about the bus, etc.
I saw the movie first, too, and I'm pretty glad it happened that way, because the book can really be used as a vehicle of, again, more information. The movie probably would have been a little bit of a letdown had I read the book first. Think of the book as more of a reference piece than a story. You already know the story, but the book gives you more depth.
At face value, I prefer the movie. But just because I wanted to know as much as I could about Chris, the book provides a little bit more of that. However, I don't like Krakauer's writing style, and his personal additions just seemed out of place and unnecessary.