Oh I'm sorry, Did I Break Your Conversation........Well Allow Me A Movie Thread by S&T

Sounds right up my alley. Might get it right now.

Watched Attack the Block last night and Battle: Los Angeles today. One was fantastic and the other couldn't end soon enough. I'm sure you guys can sort that out.
 
anti-christ is a hundred times better. they aren't in the same ball park unfortunately
i dont recommend 
pimp.gif
 to melencholia. bummed me out a few times had to stop for a bit. the movie is growing on me the more i think about it though. need to sleep 

acting was sriously top notch
 
anti-christ is a hundred times better. they aren't in the same ball park unfortunately
i dont recommend 
pimp.gif
 to melencholia. bummed me out a few times had to stop for a bit. the movie is growing on me the more i think about it though. need to sleep 

acting was sriously top notch
 
I decided on Hobo with a Shotgun instead.

MrO was right. Awesome.

The Adjustment Bureau
Attack the Block
Battle: Los Angeles
Bridesmaids
Cedar Rapids
Hall Pass
Hesher
Hobo with a Shotgun
Horrible Bosses
Kill the Irishman
Scream 4
Win Win

My list is slowly expanding. By the way, CP, Company Men is 2010.
 
I decided on Hobo with a Shotgun instead.

MrO was right. Awesome.

The Adjustment Bureau
Attack the Block
Battle: Los Angeles
Bridesmaids
Cedar Rapids
Hall Pass
Hesher
Hobo with a Shotgun
Horrible Bosses
Kill the Irishman
Scream 4
Win Win

My list is slowly expanding. By the way, CP, Company Men is 2010.
 
If it ever comes to redbox, and you're into zombies, check out The Dead. It's a film that's shot entirely in Africa. The best zombies you'll ever see. They look amazing, the film itself looks amazing. I've never had such a strong affection towards zombies than I did after that film. The plot and script are both a bit on the weak side, the acting is nothing to write home about, but it's definitely more of a visual film. There isn't much dialog to begin with, so it doesn't damper the effect of the film too much. I saw it about a month ago and have been dying to watch it again on a home theater, but I know it won't come out for a while. It's pretty much Resident Evil 5 meets Night of the Living Dead. If you're a horror fan in the slightest, you need to do yourself a favor and check it out.

Here's a little (big?) write-up I did for it when I first saw it, it contains spoilers. In the review I compared it moreso to Day of the Dead X 28 Days Later X Serpent in the Rainbow, but I doubt yall know those films well-enough to understand my comparison. Basically, the voodoo elements and setting of Serpent, the isolation of Day, and the search for salvation of 28 Days Later. If you enjoy this, definitely check out Zombie (Lucio Fulci), which shares a lot with this one.

Spoiler [+]
I'll preface this by saying that the theater I was in had about 80% of it empty, and the other 20% were pretentious film snobs/horror snobs who snickered at every little line, so that took away a bit of the fun for me.

At the same time of my showing there was a Midnight screening for The Shining, which had about 15x the amount of people in their theater.

As I was walking out, I overheard a girl whisper to her (boy)friend, "The movie would've been a lot better if there wasn't any dialogue."

The first 20-30 minutes or so, there isn't any, and it was shaping up to be the finest zombie film in about 30 years. The film does nothing groundbreaking, there's not really too many new elements they introduce, and they stick to the book regarding most zombie lore. If I had to, I'd say it's a cross of Serpent and the Rainbow x Day of the Dead x 28 Days Later.

It was Serpent and the Rainbow in the obvious sense of it taking place in Africa, it was Day of the Dead with the climax and some of the dialogue, and 28 Days Later in a sense of people looking for salvation elsewhere. It also had some elements of Zombie too, which makes sense.

Before I get into any spoilers, the films about a military crew who crashes while aboard a plane, and the engineer on the plane is the only survivor, and he meets up with an African soldier who wants to find his boy who was saved by a rescue crew and taken north to a salvation camp.

SPOILERS.

The opening scene kind of ruins 95% of the movie. If you pay attention, which I happened to, you'll notice what's going to happen, and you're anticipating what's going to happen.

The movie looks gorgeous. It's got some grain to it, but at times it's a little too dark, and it was shot on film, not digital. And maybe it was just my indy theater, but the sound system was on way too loud. The mixing was a bit off at times, there would be dialogue going on while the background noise was killing the entire scene. I don't know if that's my theaters fault, or just a rough audio mix.

The movie starts off with Brian in the desert, as I said, basically setting up the rest of the movie. What's he doing? How did he get there? That's the movie about to unfold. We're then thrown into the plane which he survived. I really liked that scene; if it weren't so noisy and hectic, it might be the best scene in the film. No other zombie film that I can think of plays with the emotions of having to kill someone you love. They do here, and it's intense and thrilling. It feels rushed in a sense, but it's a scene where we actually see some real emotion by good actors, and it's all very in your face. The forthcoming zombie assault on the village was also very well done, I'd say probably my favorite scene in the film. Chaos reigns. It's very organized and well-shot, and well-directed. Until this point, there's been very little dialogue between characters, and when there is, it's done very well. If you watch the first 30 minutes, you'd think this was one of the best zombie films you'd ever seen.

And then the lead opens his mouth. It's not that the script is TERRIBLE, it's pretty bad, but it's still not the worst script you've ever seen, but it's amplified because of the performance of the actor. He's a great physical actor. When it's just him on screen, or with zombies, or playing out the scene, he's very sufficient. But when he starts to have a conversation with someone, you get the sense that he'd never talked to anyone older than nine years old before. A lot of his comments are meant to have some wit to them, but he's just never subtle and it comes off strangely, often making the horror snobs giggle with glee. The other leader is actually a much better actor and was far more believable as far as making a character is concerned. His lines aren't any better, but his delivery is much better.

Whenever villagers talked with one another, they seemed fine, it's just whenever the lead actor ever said anything, it just seemed so off, both in terms of the script and delivery.

The movie delved into the religious effects of the zombie outbreak, and that's when the resemblance of John's scene from Day of the Dead sprung to mine. Call it ripping it off, call it a homage, but one of the elders of one of the villages spit out the same speech John did, just changing the words. The context was exactly the same. God is punishing us for what we did to his land, and we are at his mercy. It wasn't bad, but it was clear where they got their source material.

Some parts just don't really make sense at all. This isn't a slasher and we're supposed to believe that these guys are somewhat logical people, but yet both of them seemingly love to go into dark, narrow corridors where their flashlight always seems to die. The one downer about this film is it relies a lot on jump scares to try and spook the audience, which I'm not too fond of. Let the movie be, you don't have to try and scare the audience every 5 minutes. Also there's a scene where the lead takes a baby away from a soon-to-be-zombie, and literally about 30 seconds later, he finds a rescue van, puts the baby on it, and watches the van ride into the sunset, after he had been traveling on foot for a few days without food-and-water, with a treacherous hike still to go. Why didn't he just hop into the van too? Beats me, I would have though.

The gore was top-notch in this though. There were some scenes of CGI, but it wasn't as obvious and low-budget as GAR's recent efforts. This film puts Diary and Survival in it's dust, and maybe even Land too if you can get over it's poor script. The movie has a lot going on without there being too much dialogue. The film lets the pictures make the movie, not the dialogue. Some shots were some of the better CGI gunshots I've seen. They weren't completely over the the top, but they were damn good and gory. Some of the head-smashes also looked pretty gruesome, a few made me wince a bit.

The zombies themselves were very creepy. I've never been "afraid," of zombies, and I probably never will, but these guys just looked eerie. It was the minimalist make-up with the contact lenses that did it for me. You don't have tons of decay on these guys. You just have fresh wounds, slow-movement, and creepy eyes. Combined with the gore and the cinematography, it was easily the best part of the film. I don't know if zombies have ever looked better, I really like the way they were achieved in this one. They reminded me of touched-up, creepier looking NOTLD-remake zombies, which were always my favorite.

The film isn't without it's flaws, but if you can ignore it for 100 minutes, it's some of the best stuff you'll ever see in terms of zombie films. Like I said before, it doesn't break any new ground, but it's definitely a film made for genre fans. Not too many nods to other films, that would take away from the reality of the situation, but it's source material is straight out of the GAR zombie-work. And he'd be proud to have this follow his lore.

Zombies in Africa. I dig it.

It's tied with Insidious as the two best movies I've seen in a LONG time that start off being potential genre classics, and fall-off towards the end.
 
If it ever comes to redbox, and you're into zombies, check out The Dead. It's a film that's shot entirely in Africa. The best zombies you'll ever see. They look amazing, the film itself looks amazing. I've never had such a strong affection towards zombies than I did after that film. The plot and script are both a bit on the weak side, the acting is nothing to write home about, but it's definitely more of a visual film. There isn't much dialog to begin with, so it doesn't damper the effect of the film too much. I saw it about a month ago and have been dying to watch it again on a home theater, but I know it won't come out for a while. It's pretty much Resident Evil 5 meets Night of the Living Dead. If you're a horror fan in the slightest, you need to do yourself a favor and check it out.

Here's a little (big?) write-up I did for it when I first saw it, it contains spoilers. In the review I compared it moreso to Day of the Dead X 28 Days Later X Serpent in the Rainbow, but I doubt yall know those films well-enough to understand my comparison. Basically, the voodoo elements and setting of Serpent, the isolation of Day, and the search for salvation of 28 Days Later. If you enjoy this, definitely check out Zombie (Lucio Fulci), which shares a lot with this one.

Spoiler [+]
I'll preface this by saying that the theater I was in had about 80% of it empty, and the other 20% were pretentious film snobs/horror snobs who snickered at every little line, so that took away a bit of the fun for me.

At the same time of my showing there was a Midnight screening for The Shining, which had about 15x the amount of people in their theater.

As I was walking out, I overheard a girl whisper to her (boy)friend, "The movie would've been a lot better if there wasn't any dialogue."

The first 20-30 minutes or so, there isn't any, and it was shaping up to be the finest zombie film in about 30 years. The film does nothing groundbreaking, there's not really too many new elements they introduce, and they stick to the book regarding most zombie lore. If I had to, I'd say it's a cross of Serpent and the Rainbow x Day of the Dead x 28 Days Later.

It was Serpent and the Rainbow in the obvious sense of it taking place in Africa, it was Day of the Dead with the climax and some of the dialogue, and 28 Days Later in a sense of people looking for salvation elsewhere. It also had some elements of Zombie too, which makes sense.

Before I get into any spoilers, the films about a military crew who crashes while aboard a plane, and the engineer on the plane is the only survivor, and he meets up with an African soldier who wants to find his boy who was saved by a rescue crew and taken north to a salvation camp.

SPOILERS.

The opening scene kind of ruins 95% of the movie. If you pay attention, which I happened to, you'll notice what's going to happen, and you're anticipating what's going to happen.

The movie looks gorgeous. It's got some grain to it, but at times it's a little too dark, and it was shot on film, not digital. And maybe it was just my indy theater, but the sound system was on way too loud. The mixing was a bit off at times, there would be dialogue going on while the background noise was killing the entire scene. I don't know if that's my theaters fault, or just a rough audio mix.

The movie starts off with Brian in the desert, as I said, basically setting up the rest of the movie. What's he doing? How did he get there? That's the movie about to unfold. We're then thrown into the plane which he survived. I really liked that scene; if it weren't so noisy and hectic, it might be the best scene in the film. No other zombie film that I can think of plays with the emotions of having to kill someone you love. They do here, and it's intense and thrilling. It feels rushed in a sense, but it's a scene where we actually see some real emotion by good actors, and it's all very in your face. The forthcoming zombie assault on the village was also very well done, I'd say probably my favorite scene in the film. Chaos reigns. It's very organized and well-shot, and well-directed. Until this point, there's been very little dialogue between characters, and when there is, it's done very well. If you watch the first 30 minutes, you'd think this was one of the best zombie films you'd ever seen.

And then the lead opens his mouth. It's not that the script is TERRIBLE, it's pretty bad, but it's still not the worst script you've ever seen, but it's amplified because of the performance of the actor. He's a great physical actor. When it's just him on screen, or with zombies, or playing out the scene, he's very sufficient. But when he starts to have a conversation with someone, you get the sense that he'd never talked to anyone older than nine years old before. A lot of his comments are meant to have some wit to them, but he's just never subtle and it comes off strangely, often making the horror snobs giggle with glee. The other leader is actually a much better actor and was far more believable as far as making a character is concerned. His lines aren't any better, but his delivery is much better.

Whenever villagers talked with one another, they seemed fine, it's just whenever the lead actor ever said anything, it just seemed so off, both in terms of the script and delivery.

The movie delved into the religious effects of the zombie outbreak, and that's when the resemblance of John's scene from Day of the Dead sprung to mine. Call it ripping it off, call it a homage, but one of the elders of one of the villages spit out the same speech John did, just changing the words. The context was exactly the same. God is punishing us for what we did to his land, and we are at his mercy. It wasn't bad, but it was clear where they got their source material.

Some parts just don't really make sense at all. This isn't a slasher and we're supposed to believe that these guys are somewhat logical people, but yet both of them seemingly love to go into dark, narrow corridors where their flashlight always seems to die. The one downer about this film is it relies a lot on jump scares to try and spook the audience, which I'm not too fond of. Let the movie be, you don't have to try and scare the audience every 5 minutes. Also there's a scene where the lead takes a baby away from a soon-to-be-zombie, and literally about 30 seconds later, he finds a rescue van, puts the baby on it, and watches the van ride into the sunset, after he had been traveling on foot for a few days without food-and-water, with a treacherous hike still to go. Why didn't he just hop into the van too? Beats me, I would have though.

The gore was top-notch in this though. There were some scenes of CGI, but it wasn't as obvious and low-budget as GAR's recent efforts. This film puts Diary and Survival in it's dust, and maybe even Land too if you can get over it's poor script. The movie has a lot going on without there being too much dialogue. The film lets the pictures make the movie, not the dialogue. Some shots were some of the better CGI gunshots I've seen. They weren't completely over the the top, but they were damn good and gory. Some of the head-smashes also looked pretty gruesome, a few made me wince a bit.

The zombies themselves were very creepy. I've never been "afraid," of zombies, and I probably never will, but these guys just looked eerie. It was the minimalist make-up with the contact lenses that did it for me. You don't have tons of decay on these guys. You just have fresh wounds, slow-movement, and creepy eyes. Combined with the gore and the cinematography, it was easily the best part of the film. I don't know if zombies have ever looked better, I really like the way they were achieved in this one. They reminded me of touched-up, creepier looking NOTLD-remake zombies, which were always my favorite.

The film isn't without it's flaws, but if you can ignore it for 100 minutes, it's some of the best stuff you'll ever see in terms of zombie films. Like I said before, it doesn't break any new ground, but it's definitely a film made for genre fans. Not too many nods to other films, that would take away from the reality of the situation, but it's source material is straight out of the GAR zombie-work. And he'd be proud to have this follow his lore.

Zombies in Africa. I dig it.

It's tied with Insidious as the two best movies I've seen in a LONG time that start off being potential genre classics, and fall-off towards the end.
 
^ Gonna try and watch that ASAP. Walking Dead hasn't been doing it for me and that last part about Insidious, I agree completely.
 
^ Gonna try and watch that ASAP. Walking Dead hasn't been doing it for me and that last part about Insidious, I agree completely.
 
Just saw Reservoir Dogs.

Rewatched the main gunshot scene quite a few times, because I was confused as to who shot… dammit, now I can't remember his name… the son of the boss man. Mr. White had his gun pointed at boss man, who had his gun pointed at Mr. Orange, and the son had his gun pointed at Mr. White. Then there was a firefight, and the son ends up shot? By who? Mr. White shot boss man AND the son? Boss man definitely shot first, then… oh, hell, I'll just throw out the obligatory "Dude! Best movie ever! Tarantino for prez!" and call it a day.
laugh.gif


So that's Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Inglourious Basterds. Love Tarantino's style of 'skipping all over the place.'
 
Just saw Reservoir Dogs.

Rewatched the main gunshot scene quite a few times, because I was confused as to who shot… dammit, now I can't remember his name… the son of the boss man. Mr. White had his gun pointed at boss man, who had his gun pointed at Mr. Orange, and the son had his gun pointed at Mr. White. Then there was a firefight, and the son ends up shot? By who? Mr. White shot boss man AND the son? Boss man definitely shot first, then… oh, hell, I'll just throw out the obligatory "Dude! Best movie ever! Tarantino for prez!" and call it a day.
laugh.gif


So that's Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Inglourious Basterds. Love Tarantino's style of 'skipping all over the place.'
 
Joe shoots Mr. Orange, Mr. White shoots Joe, he then turns to shoot Nice Guy Eddie, while Nice Guy Eddie is shooting Mr. White. It's a bit of a stretch that White can shoot Joe then get a 2nd shot off in time to kill Eddie, but he does fire so you just have to believe it.
 
Joe shoots Mr. Orange, Mr. White shoots Joe, he then turns to shoot Nice Guy Eddie, while Nice Guy Eddie is shooting Mr. White. It's a bit of a stretch that White can shoot Joe then get a 2nd shot off in time to kill Eddie, but he does fire so you just have to believe it.
 
Saw Beginners a week ago. Solid flick, loved the performances by McGregor, Laurent and Plummer. Definitely not for everyone, but I was very entertained. 9/10.  Not good enough to knock Midnight in Paris out of the top spot though.
 
Saw Beginners a week ago. Solid flick, loved the performances by McGregor, Laurent and Plummer. Definitely not for everyone, but I was very entertained. 9/10.  Not good enough to knock Midnight in Paris out of the top spot though.
 
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02

Just saw Reservoir Dogs.

Rewatched the main gunshot scene quite a few times, because I was confused as to who shot… dammit, now I can't remember his name… the son of the boss man. Mr. White had his gun pointed at boss man, who had his gun pointed at Mr. Orange, and the son had his gun pointed at Mr. White. Then there was a firefight, and the son ends up shot? By who? Mr. White shot boss man AND the son? Boss man definitely shot first, then… oh, hell, I'll just throw out the obligatory "Dude! Best movie ever! Tarantino for prez!" and call it a day.
laugh.gif


So that's Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Inglourious Basterds. Love Tarantino's style of 'skipping all over the place.'

Kill Bill, Four Rooms, Death Proof, and Jackie Brown now dude, and you're gonna be livin right. 
smokin.gif
 

Admit it, it feels good don't it?  Tarantino got you now. 
laugh.gif
  And you will be extremely hyped when Django gets closer next Christmas. 


Kev, I had no idea about Company Men, I'll make the adjustment here in a bit. 
  
 
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02

Just saw Reservoir Dogs.

Rewatched the main gunshot scene quite a few times, because I was confused as to who shot… dammit, now I can't remember his name… the son of the boss man. Mr. White had his gun pointed at boss man, who had his gun pointed at Mr. Orange, and the son had his gun pointed at Mr. White. Then there was a firefight, and the son ends up shot? By who? Mr. White shot boss man AND the son? Boss man definitely shot first, then… oh, hell, I'll just throw out the obligatory "Dude! Best movie ever! Tarantino for prez!" and call it a day.
laugh.gif


So that's Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Inglourious Basterds. Love Tarantino's style of 'skipping all over the place.'

Kill Bill, Four Rooms, Death Proof, and Jackie Brown now dude, and you're gonna be livin right. 
smokin.gif
 

Admit it, it feels good don't it?  Tarantino got you now. 
laugh.gif
  And you will be extremely hyped when Django gets closer next Christmas. 


Kev, I had no idea about Company Men, I'll make the adjustment here in a bit. 
  
 
^ I've seen parts of Kill Bill; too over-the-top for me, like I've mentioned on here before. The amount of times I tell myself things like "Man, get the eff outta here" and "No effing way" is huge for me. Sure, when you step AWAY from a movie, your rationale kicks back in, but during the movie, the story needs to be sold to me.

Obviously, super hero movies and alien type flicks don't apply to what I just said.
laugh.gif


So no, Kill Bill ain't on the to-do list. Never heard of the others. I'll look 'em up, see what they're about. Not gonna lie, probably not gonna watch 'em.
laugh.gif


I said from the jump I have a very particular taste in movies, and that's why I declined being an active contributor to this thread.
laugh.gif
I don't like every-damn-thing that comes out, and decinitely don't like movies based on popularity.
 
^ I've seen parts of Kill Bill; too over-the-top for me, like I've mentioned on here before. The amount of times I tell myself things like "Man, get the eff outta here" and "No effing way" is huge for me. Sure, when you step AWAY from a movie, your rationale kicks back in, but during the movie, the story needs to be sold to me.

Obviously, super hero movies and alien type flicks don't apply to what I just said.
laugh.gif


So no, Kill Bill ain't on the to-do list. Never heard of the others. I'll look 'em up, see what they're about. Not gonna lie, probably not gonna watch 'em.
laugh.gif


I said from the jump I have a very particular taste in movies, and that's why I declined being an active contributor to this thread.
laugh.gif
I don't like every-damn-thing that comes out, and decinitely don't like movies based on popularity.
 
Aye man, Tarantino already proved it too you, he can do things.  That alone makes you check the movies, you will like what you see, I promise you.  Death Proof alone may not be your "cup of tea" so to speak, but sit still and watch it for 2 hours, you'd be amazed how tuned into it you get, and it's about nothing.  Literally, nothing.  Yet you may not even blink.  I didn't.  My wife didn't.  Prime didn't.  We all LOVED that movie, and it does things that NO other movie has done before, but I can't explain til you watch it.  (spoiler avoiding)  But you liked all you have seen from QT so far, trust him on these as well, they are worth the looks. 

FWIW, Four Rooms is a movie with 4 stories, only one of the stories is done by QT, not the whole entire movie, so you could just watch his part (like 20-25 minutes) or watch the whole movie, your call.  I recommend the whole movie, it's good stuff. 

And Kill Bill really is worth your time, even if it is a bit far fetched, the first is actiony, the second is moreso the dialogue QT is known for.  All great tho. 
 
Aye man, Tarantino already proved it too you, he can do things.  That alone makes you check the movies, you will like what you see, I promise you.  Death Proof alone may not be your "cup of tea" so to speak, but sit still and watch it for 2 hours, you'd be amazed how tuned into it you get, and it's about nothing.  Literally, nothing.  Yet you may not even blink.  I didn't.  My wife didn't.  Prime didn't.  We all LOVED that movie, and it does things that NO other movie has done before, but I can't explain til you watch it.  (spoiler avoiding)  But you liked all you have seen from QT so far, trust him on these as well, they are worth the looks. 

FWIW, Four Rooms is a movie with 4 stories, only one of the stories is done by QT, not the whole entire movie, so you could just watch his part (like 20-25 minutes) or watch the whole movie, your call.  I recommend the whole movie, it's good stuff. 

And Kill Bill really is worth your time, even if it is a bit far fetched, the first is actiony, the second is moreso the dialogue QT is known for.  All great tho. 
 
A movie about nothing? Have you not paid attention to any of my posts on my movie criterion/preferences?
laugh.gif


One of my qualms w/ Hollywood is that there is so little substance in movies. My favorite movies challenge the viewer, forcing him to take on a particular viewpoint. Movies I watch just for entertainment are movies that have an interesting storyline, just nothing like a major character struggle (these are my superhero movies, alien movies, time travel joints, & movies like Reservoir Dogs

But a movie I'm being told is about… nothing? Movies about nothing are the bane of my media experience.
laugh.gif
You couldn't have turned me off to the movie more if you had told me it had a fleet of gay centaurs prancing around in every scene (word to 300, another popular movie I have no interest in seeing).
laugh.gif
 
A movie about nothing? Have you not paid attention to any of my posts on my movie criterion/preferences?
laugh.gif


One of my qualms w/ Hollywood is that there is so little substance in movies. My favorite movies challenge the viewer, forcing him to take on a particular viewpoint. Movies I watch just for entertainment are movies that have an interesting storyline, just nothing like a major character struggle (these are my superhero movies, alien movies, time travel joints, & movies like Reservoir Dogs

But a movie I'm being told is about… nothing? Movies about nothing are the bane of my media experience.
laugh.gif
You couldn't have turned me off to the movie more if you had told me it had a fleet of gay centaurs prancing around in every scene (word to 300, another popular movie I have no interest in seeing).
laugh.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom