tupacsback
Banned
- 340
- 13
Spurs are on the hunt for 5...... I dont think no one stopping mr fundamentals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But how much do you credit him for their success? You can take a bum off the street and give him KD, Russ, and Harden, and they'll make the playoffs. Maybe not a bad coach, but an average one. You could replace him with a number of coaches and I think they're exactly in the same spot they are now.Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
^^^^
Thats the thing, if not Scott then who? He hasn't don't a bad job at all. He got a top 4 team, maybe better, and has done so in a short time. Bad coach? Don't think so.
It is almost like Spoelstra. They both can get away with only running ISO plays for their stars. Until they play the SpursOriginally Posted by Big J 33
But how much do you credit him for their success? You can take a bum off the street and give him KD, Russ, and Harden, and they'll make the playoffs. Maybe not a bad coach, but an average one. You could replace him with a number of coaches and I think they're exactly in the same spot they are now.Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
^^^^
Thats the thing, if not Scott then who? He hasn't don't a bad job at all. He got a top 4 team, maybe better, and has done so in a short time. Bad coach? Don't think so.
Spo's inbounds plays are usually on pointOriginally Posted by knightngale
Even Spoelstra runs a few plays for easy butckets after time outs
Originally Posted by Big J 33
But how much do you credit him for their success? You can take a bum off the street and give him KD, Russ, and Harden, and they'll make the playoffs. Maybe not a bad coach, but an average one. You could replace him with a number of coaches and I think they're exactly in the same spot they are now.Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
^^^^
Thats the thing, if not Scott then who? He hasn't don't a bad job at all. He got a top 4 team, maybe better, and has done so in a short time. Bad coach? Don't think so.
Originally Posted by Big J 33
But how much do you credit him for their success? You can take a bum off the street and give him KD, Russ, and Harden, and they'll make the playoffs. Maybe not a bad coach, but an average one. You could replace him with a number of coaches and I think they're exactly in the same spot they are now.Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
^^^^
Thats the thing, if not Scott then who? He hasn't don't a bad job at all. He got a top 4 team, maybe better, and has done so in a short time. Bad coach? Don't think so.
Originally Posted by nflowshoe
Originally Posted by Big J 33
But how much do you credit him for their success? You can take a bum off the street and give him KD, Russ, and Harden, and they'll make the playoffs. Maybe not a bad coach, but an average one. You could replace him with a number of coaches and I think they're exactly in the same spot they are now.Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
^^^^
Thats the thing, if not Scott then who? He hasn't don't a bad job at all. He got a top 4 team, maybe better, and has done so in a short time. Bad coach? Don't think so.
IMO, for the fact that Brooks can keep Perkins under control, westbrook & durant happy, and Harden(can start for any team) happy with his role of the bench makes him a good coach/manager. I put this lost on the players, they were up by 7 late in the game and let the Spurs get easy layups while the thunder shoot 20ft jumpers. Im not sure what was up with Ibaka not playing but trust the reasoning for him not playing to be better for the team in the long run.
Originally Posted by Stillmatic23
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2840587Originally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by Scientific Method
How is Crawford going to wait to see that Duncan missed to make that beyond questionable call?
something ive noticed more and more these playoffs
Originally Posted by KenJi714
What the hell is that in your avy ?Originally Posted by MrONegative
thisOriginally Posted by Seymore CAKE
KD seeing that defense LeBron saw in 07
and that whole 'cutting the head off the snake' @@#, just to get RW feelin himself too much...genius.
Originally Posted by nflowshoe
Originally Posted by Big J 33
But how much do you credit him for their success? You can take a bum off the street and give him KD, Russ, and Harden, and they'll make the playoffs. Maybe not a bad coach, but an average one. You could replace him with a number of coaches and I think they're exactly in the same spot they are now.Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
^^^^
Thats the thing, if not Scott then who? He hasn't don't a bad job at all. He got a top 4 team, maybe better, and has done so in a short time. Bad coach? Don't think so.
IMO, for the fact that Brooks can keep Perkins under control, westbrook & durant happy, and Harden(can start for any team) happy with his role off the bench makes him a good coach/manager. I put this lost on the players, they were up by 7 late in the game and let the Spurs get easy layups while the thunder shoot 20ft jumpers. Im not sure what was up with Ibaka not playing but trust the reasoning for him not playing to be better for the team in the long run.
You're trollin.Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
Originally Posted by buggz05
Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
Lol, you thunder "fans" sound like laker fans right now. They lost a game to a good team and now you want the entire team taken apart. It's one game, it's a young team.
Name one Scott Brooks fan.
You during round1, round 2, and any other game they win.
Originally Posted by buggz05
Your trollin.Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
Originally Posted by buggz05
Name one Scott Brooks fan.
You during round1, round 2, and any other game they win.
I still say Thunder in 5 or 6 off of youth and talent, not coaching. Scott Brooks hasn't won a single game in his career that I've watched the Thunder play.
You honestly believe the Thunder can win four in a row? That's a lot to ask.Originally Posted by buggz05
You're trollin.Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
Originally Posted by buggz05
Name one Scott Brooks fan.
You during round1, round 2, and any other game they win.
I still say Thunder in 5 or 6 off of youth and talent, not coaching. Scott Brooks hasn't won a single game in his career that I've watched the Thunder play.
Originally Posted by dmbrhs
You honestly believe the Thunder can win four in a row? That's a lot to ask.Originally Posted by buggz05
You're trollin.Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
You during round1, round 2, and any other game they win.
I still say Thunder in 5 or 6 off of youth and talent, not coaching. Scott Brooks hasn't won a single game in his career that I've watched the Thunder play.
Originally Posted by Scientific Method
Manu and Harden's "double flop."
Originally Posted by Scientific Method
Originally Posted by nflowshoe
Originally Posted by Big J 33
But how much do you credit him for their success? You can take a bum off the street and give him KD, Russ, and Harden, and they'll make the playoffs. Maybe not a bad coach, but an average one. You could replace him with a number of coaches and I think they're exactly in the same spot they are now.
IMO, for the fact that Brooks can keep Perkins under control, westbrook & durant happy, and Harden(can start for any team) happy with his role off the bench makes him a good coach/manager. I put this lost on the players, they were up by 7 late in the game and let the Spurs get easy layups while the thunder shoot 20ft jumpers. Im not sure what was up with Ibaka not playing but trust the reasoning for him not playing to be better for the team in the long run.
So everything positive, credit the coach, everything negative is the players fault? Sounds eerily similar to Jesus and every other God in religion.at you puttin' Brooks on that type of pedestal.
Yall are acting like Duncan was putting in major work. He had 16 and 11 on 15 shots (40% shooting) and was at the top of the key most of the game after setting screens. For whatever disadvantage you get going from Perkins to Ibaka defensively, you gain an advantage in rim protection. They doubled us up 52 to 26 in the paint, particularly in the 4th where Ibaka didn't play. It was layup city.