john mayer
Banned
- 258
- 10
boring series is boring.
SA and OKC fans seem to be mad corny too
SA and OKC fans seem to be mad corny too
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
whoopsOriginally Posted by Scientific Method
nvm
Originally Posted by Do Be Doo
Shout out to follow NTer Elpablo21 for making the trip.
Originally Posted by buggz05
It's definitely not impossible. I've watched the Thunder enough to say that when they play like crap they only lose by 1-3 points. Almost stole Game 1 if not for some bad match ups from old Scottie. 10 more seconds on the clock and I think game 1 would've had a different outcome.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
You honestly believe the Thunder can win four in a row? That's a lot to ask.Originally Posted by buggz05
You're trollin.
I still say Thunder in 5 or 6 off of youth and talent, not coaching. Scott Brooks hasn't won a single game in his career that I've watched the Thunder play.
I think they get one on the road obviously, whether it's a game 2 or a game 5. It's hard for any team to win at OKC so I think they get those 2.
Basically I think they'll get 4 out of the next 5 games and probably wrap up at home.
Obviously Greg Pop vs Scottie Brooks is the X factor here, and Greg Pop takes the cake. The Spurs are the smarter team, and the Thunder are a more hard-nosed team that pushes the ball harder.
The Spurs can keep up with the pace of the Thunder -- and vice versa -- but it throws them off-sync a bit in the momentum of their half-court sets.
Awesome matchups this series. Could easily go either way. It will be a game-by-game series, which means I won't be surprised by any outcome of this series other than a sweep.
Originally Posted by John Mayer
boring series is boring.
SA and OKC fans seem to be mad corny too
Originally Posted by John Mayer
boring series is boring.
SA and OKC fans seem to be mad corny too
Originally Posted by nflowshoe
Originally Posted by John Mayer
boring series is boring.
SA and OKC fans seem to be mad corny too
IMO, game one was pretty entertaining basketball wise. Thunder and Spurs have some of the best fan support in the NBA.
I'd buy into your "fluke" argument a little bit if San Antonio hadn't had 14 turnovers in the first half. That's not happening again. Cut those turnovers in half and the Spurs lead by six or eight at half.Originally Posted by buggz05
Originally Posted by nflowshoe
Originally Posted by John Mayer
boring series is boring.
SA and OKC fans seem to be mad corny too
IMO, game one was pretty entertaining basketball wise. Thunder and Spurs have some of the best fan support in the NBA.
Agreed on the fan support. I'm diggin this Red River NBA stuff.
I thought game 1 was a fluke though other than seeing Ginobli light up Harden which was entertaining as an NBA fan, not so much a Thunder fan. A fluke because Russ/Parker were MIA and Ibaka sat the whole 4th Quarter. Durant and Duncan were under-par as well.
I'm gonna have to go ahead and disagree, saw them run multiple sets last nightOriginally Posted by buggz05
I hear the "Brooks tames a bunch of immature players and turned them into finals contenders" argument all of the time. I simply disagree with it. I think the players that we have are cut from a different cloth, and to Brooks credit you do hear him say that a lot in his press conferences. Basically what I am saying is that I think the Thunder players are hungry and basketball mature enough to go as far as they've gone by themselves.Originally Posted by jordan23dotcom
Originally Posted by buggz05
Your trollin.
I still say Thunder in 5 or 6 off of youth and talent, not coaching. Scott Brooks hasn't won a single game in his career that I've watched the Thunder play.
Naw bro, by your logic all brooks does is hand them water. How many teams with talent don't even make the 1st round of the playoffs, or even make it in. He's no P Jackson but he's doing work.
I will say that something about Scott Brooks is ingenius. I think his non-offensive-rebounding strategy may possibly be some type of ingenius scheme to get the other team to play at a faster pace with the Thunder. The players definitely by into his scheme. And I have to give him credit for simply letting them run loose without limiting their abilities.
It's his match-ups and lack of momentum control that makes him a bad coach imo. I'm talking about entire halves and quarters where he is being out matched with players. They literally do not rebound and they literally do not run an offensive scheme other than Westbrook attack, Durant shoot, everybody else spot up.
He is a personel manager not a game manager. And he can thank Sam Presti for giving him players with the an easily manageable personality. Give me game management and a defensive strategy any day of the week. This team has the capability to become a dynasty. Anything less would beas a fan who has to watch good teams lose their chance at greatness over a span of years; and all from a lack of offensive rebounds, time-outs and simple defensive match-ups.
Steve Kerr brought that up in the first half. OKC's offensive unit is small, which leaves them open for getting abused in the post and pick and rolls. Their defensive unit sacrifices a lot of offensive versatility, and the Spurs can work the perimeter for whatever they want. With those long range shooters they have, it can be devastating.Originally Posted by PMatic
Re-watched the game earlier today.
Poor James had no idea what to do defensively in the fourth quarter.The Thunder are going to have to improve their defensive rotations if they want to continue to use their small ball lineup.
And what does he have to show for it? But I digress...Originally Posted by AceboogieDBF
^ george karl has always had some talented teams...