- 9,892
- 188
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2005
LMAO dude got the finger.
- 9,892
- 188
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2005
LMAO dude got the finger.
- 9,892
- 188
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2005
Originally Posted by BigUglyAmerican
- 9,892
- 188
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2005
Originally Posted by BigUglyAmerican
- 2,670
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2006
I know some of you guys may not know his whole history, but I recommend cutting off any articles from Alex Jones. He's one of those "journalists" that believes EVERY conspiracy theory, thus discrediting anything legitimate he may have to offer, even if pieces of his articles are true.
- 2,670
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2006
I know some of you guys may not know his whole history, but I recommend cutting off any articles from Alex Jones. He's one of those "journalists" that believes EVERY conspiracy theory, thus discrediting anything legitimate he may have to offer, even if pieces of his articles are true.
- 23,673
- 15,141
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
Iraqi troops immediately went underground, how many actual "conventional battles" were there? My point is not size of army but tactics. No army such as Iraq in 1991 or 2003 has fought a conventional war against the US since Korea and China in the 1950's.
We do better in conventional warfare compared to guerilla warfare. You obviously know nothing about war and our military. We have a bigger military, our technology is superior, we have tons of strategies and tactics superior to them, we have the best military strategists in the world, we have more experience at warfare, we have better trained soldiers, we have better intel, we have stealth, we are more mobile, we are faster at deployment....etc....etc....etc. The only warfare that we're not accustomed to is guerilla warfare because we're not as experience in it and our tactics sometimes to apply to that type of setting, but we're slowly adjusting to it. Read a few military warfare books before you come back in here and try to post an argument, I've read so many (even books on other military such as the Pakistani-Indian conflict).
- 23,673
- 15,141
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
Iraqi troops immediately went underground, how many actual "conventional battles" were there? My point is not size of army but tactics. No army such as Iraq in 1991 or 2003 has fought a conventional war against the US since Korea and China in the 1950's.
We do better in conventional warfare compared to guerilla warfare. You obviously know nothing about war and our military. We have a bigger military, our technology is superior, we have tons of strategies and tactics superior to them, we have the best military strategists in the world, we have more experience at warfare, we have better trained soldiers, we have better intel, we have stealth, we are more mobile, we are faster at deployment....etc....etc....etc. The only warfare that we're not accustomed to is guerilla warfare because we're not as experience in it and our tactics sometimes to apply to that type of setting, but we're slowly adjusting to it. Read a few military warfare books before you come back in here and try to post an argument, I've read so many (even books on other military such as the Pakistani-Indian conflict).
- 2,406
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2007
I think Pieczenik may be confusing his fictional writing and reality.
- 2,406
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2007
I think Pieczenik may be confusing his fictional writing and reality.
- 2,328
- 2,078
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2010
What's with dudes posting long @%+ , poorly written, garbage "articles" instead of a simple link ?
I'm
at anyone STILL taking our pet doggy seriously in any type of military engagement against US forces.
What planet are you living on ?
Saddam "headed" the insurgency ?
The "Iraqi military" element of the insurgency is minuscule. The real damage was done by the Islamic insurgents... the same ones who hated Saddam and his government. (Much like the people who would be fighting against us after we obliterate Pakistan's army off the face of the earth in a matter of days/weeks)
On the topic of Osama...
@ the media obsession over who will "succeed' him. So desperate for a face/name to point to and simplify everything. Still clueless over the fact that al-Qaeda is not much of an "organization" or "group" but rather an idea. An idea that will exist as long as our foreign policies exist, no matter who we kill.
I'm
What planet are you living on ?
Saddam "headed" the insurgency ?
The "Iraqi military" element of the insurgency is minuscule. The real damage was done by the Islamic insurgents... the same ones who hated Saddam and his government. (Much like the people who would be fighting against us after we obliterate Pakistan's army off the face of the earth in a matter of days/weeks)
On the topic of Osama...
- 2,328
- 2,078
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2010
What's with dudes posting long @%+ , poorly written, garbage "articles" instead of a simple link ?
I'm
at anyone STILL taking our pet doggy seriously in any type of military engagement against US forces.
What planet are you living on ?
Saddam "headed" the insurgency ?
The "Iraqi military" element of the insurgency is minuscule. The real damage was done by the Islamic insurgents... the same ones who hated Saddam and his government. (Much like the people who would be fighting against us after we obliterate Pakistan's army off the face of the earth in a matter of days/weeks)
On the topic of Osama...
@ the media obsession over who will "succeed' him. So desperate for a face/name to point to and simplify everything. Still clueless over the fact that al-Qaeda is not much of an "organization" or "group" but rather an idea. An idea that will exist as long as our foreign policies exist, no matter who we kill.
I'm
What planet are you living on ?
Saddam "headed" the insurgency ?
The "Iraqi military" element of the insurgency is minuscule. The real damage was done by the Islamic insurgents... the same ones who hated Saddam and his government. (Much like the people who would be fighting against us after we obliterate Pakistan's army off the face of the earth in a matter of days/weeks)
On the topic of Osama...
- 44,171
- 2,499
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2006
This really took 10+ years find this man.
Pitiful
Pitiful
- 44,171
- 2,499
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2006
This really took 10+ years find this man.
Pitiful
Pitiful
- 157,489
- 137,486
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
Go to the 1:50 mark, notice the foreshadowing of what went down @ 9/11. I know coincidence - http://www.youtube.com/wa...-EZw&feature=related
- 157,489
- 137,486
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
Go to the 1:50 mark, notice the foreshadowing of what went down @ 9/11. I know coincidence - http://www.youtube.com/wa...-EZw&feature=related
- 157,489
- 137,486
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
For those that don't believe and think everything that is "conspiracy" is just foolish
Go to the 1:50 mark, notice the foreshadowing of what went down @ 9/11. I know coincidence - http://www.youtube.com/wa...-EZw&feature=related
Go to the 1:50 mark, notice the foreshadowing of what went down @ 9/11. I know coincidence - http://www.youtube.com/wa...-EZw&feature=related
- 157,489
- 137,486
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
For those that don't believe and think everything that is "conspiracy" is just foolish
Go to the 1:50 mark, notice the foreshadowing of what went down @ 9/11. I know coincidence - http://www.youtube.com/wa...-EZw&feature=related
Go to the 1:50 mark, notice the foreshadowing of what went down @ 9/11. I know coincidence - http://www.youtube.com/wa...-EZw&feature=related
- 1,514
- 12
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2010
Oh yay...Another Youtube scholar lol...Stop living in a make believe fairy tale world and grow up
P.S. one of the comments on the video:
This guy is an Illuminati.
F= 6th letter of the alphat.
arhank: 6 letters
501: 5+0+1= 6.
666. Coincidence?
- 1,514
- 12
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2010
Oh yay...Another Youtube scholar lol...Stop living in a make believe fairy tale world and grow up
P.S. one of the comments on the video:
This guy is an Illuminati.
F= 6th letter of the alphat.
arhank: 6 letters
501: 5+0+1= 6.
666. Coincidence?
- 157,489
- 137,486
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
I simply said look at the 9/11 foreshadowing portion of the video. Why is something not valid if it comes from YouTube?