- 234
- 14
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2004
She reminds me of Rebecca Romijn
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by FlipnKraut
This wasn't some group of people that voted on who has the perfect face, this was based on a mathematical blueprint of the human face. I feel like a majority of you are just ignoring that tidbit of information completely.
There was even another study done where they took something like 100 different pictures of beautiful women (of all ethnicities) and overlaid them one on top of another creating a composite face. That composite looked somewhat like this chick. If I can find a link to that study, I'll post it.
Originally Posted by ATLien Seeko
< BR>
Originally Posted by thegooch06
This is a very interesting article. Along the same lines, I remember that Time magazine did a cover story a few years ago that discussed the ideal standards of (Western?) beauty (like the importance of symmetry). Based upon a similar criteria mentioned in this article, Julia Roberts was considered to be an ideal of female beauty, while Denzel Washington represents an ideal of male beauty.
Originally Posted by ShadyKay NT
So what's the point of the thread again?
Originally Posted by Tr1ll
Originally Posted by FlipnKraut
This wasn't some group of people that voted on who has the perfect face, this was based on a mathematical blueprint of the human face. I feel like a majority of you are just ignoring that tidbit of information completely.
There was even another study done where they took something like 100 different pictures of beautiful women (of all ethnicities) and overlaid them one on top of another creating a composite face. That composite looked somewhat like this chick. If I can find a link to that study, I'll post it.
You trying to tell me the only person to fit that equation is a blonde haired, blue eyed woman?
Originally Posted by Scientific Method
The fact they created a mathematical equation doesn't make it any less subjective and subject to bias though.
Originally Posted by AZwildcats
The anti-white girl movement is strong in here. I'm not a fan of blonde's being African myself, but even I cant deny she has an attractive face. Get off your Malcolm X steez and learn to look objectively fellas
Originally Posted by AZwildcats
The anti-white girl movement is strong in here. I'm not a fan of blonde's being African myself, but even I cant deny she has an attractive face. Get off your Malcolm X steez and learn to look objectively fellas
Not at all,think he means to actually look objectively. Is it that hard to do?Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000
Originally Posted by AZwildcats
The anti-white girl movement is strong in here. I'm not a fan of blonde's being African myself, but even I cant deny she has an attractive face. Get off your Malcolm X steez and learn to look objectively fellas
by objective you mean the Eurocentric point of view right?
And who is to decide this golden ratio is golden? what if I like my females to have bigger noses, bigger ears, longer or shorter faces, etc.Originally Posted by FlipnKraut
Scientific Method said:The fact they created a mathematical equation doesn't make it any less subjective and subject to bias though.
Thats the point of a mathematical equation, to take the bias out. You build a formula off the golden ratio, measure peoples faces, plug in the numbers. Closest to X wins a prize.
Here for all of you that are pissed off about it being a white chick
That chick on the right doesnt look white to me, but she fits the golden ratio mask.