- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,213
- 40,126
Do I own a new 2024? No, that was part of my point. I wouldn't buy one as they got rid of all the physical buttons for climate. But your comparison is garbage. You can't compare a phone screen to a car infotainment screen. Phones are designed to take abuse. For cars, it's not the screen getting beat up, it's the software that's all buggy in the car. Having driven plenty of demo Fords when I worked, I got to see cars with screens up close since they became a thing (well before the old brick radio with a nav screen got replaced with a full blown system that couldn't come out).
When you have everything go through the screen (i.e NO physical buttons), when the screen goes bezerk, you can't do anything inside the car. Can't run climate, can't run nav, can't run anything. Just ask GM how their all new EV Blazer is working out? They put a full DO NOT DRIVE & a STOP SELL on them. Several journalists were to use them for stories and one had to abandon the car within 28 hours in a coast to coast trip.
Problem most have with all functions on screen, is you can't just change settings for normal use items WITHOUT having to take your eyes off the road. Buttons? Muscle memory comes in as you know where each button is and what they are for, so you can just use it without looking. Not on a screen. And trust me I'm not alone.
Those are more “what if” scenarios than reality, Range Rovers have that happen to their screen here and there where it takes a minute to turn on or they have to turn the car off and on but thats LR for you.
I do agree with screens replacing buttons. Absolutely hate that, and it is not more convenient. Its just to get rid of clutter and a more “simple and elegant” interior but in reality its a PITA. I dont mind screens, but not at the cost of physical buttons (climate, volume, etc.)