question about the cdp 2s

[hugo]

why is it that these are like the only jordans that still says nike on them? or is there others retro/cdp that say nike on them? why cant they just keepputting nike on other retro/cdp jordans when they still do to the 2s?

 

[ny giants 11]

Its all a scam.

 

[Spectacular23]

The charity 2s had a jumpman on them if that matters.

 

[trite4321]

ugly shoes nI do not see what yall see in them

 

[xnyles]

I ask myself that everyday

 

[brooklynnyc3000]

^^^^

What he said. Man, JB be playing games with us yo.

 

[mst9023]

there showing us that they can still put nike on shoes they just choose not to with our favorites like the 3,4,5,and 6. there basically slapping us in the face

 

[sneakerheadsonly]

damnit JB I hate YOU

 

[xtrill]

i wish we know
but the 2's are one of my favorite kicks and im glad they dropped the white/red colorway

 

[brendanmaguire]

Originally Posted by Xnyles

I ask myself that everyday

 

[crossshooter]

in before lock

 

[Animal Thug]

At first JB says, No nike on Jordan shoes to protect OG collectors....

so hmm....how about we slap NIKE on one of the most OLDEST Air Jordan models and just kill the heart of the loyalist customers.

The Jordan 2 was considered a failure in Nike's & JBs mind. Mike hated them...

SO why mess up a classic 'again' by replacing NIKE with a symbol? They keep NIKE and everybodys happy..

 

[hugo]

Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539

At first JB says, No nike on Jordan shoes to protect OG collectors....

so hmm....how about we slap NIKE on one of the most OLDEST Air Jordan models and just kill the heart of the loyalist customers.

The Jordan 2 was considered a failure in Nike's & JBs mind. Mike hated them...

SO why mess up a classic 'again' by replacing NIKE with a symbol? They keep NIKE and everybodys happy..

thanx 4 the info

 

[greatone33333]

VERY NICE

 

[Mactastic4167]

i never took the time to find out myself, ive asked myself this over a thousand times.

 

[airuphere23]

The 2's are not as bad as people make them out to be. I actually think the 2's are smooth but it does defy logic as to why JB would only put a NIKE onthe back of the 2's but not any of the more revered models.

 

[moorevisual]

well, all the 1's have swooshes on the side and say Nike (on the bottom of the sole)

 

[3thaman]

The best line I hear on this board atleast once a month is that JB has to pay Nike Royalties to use it.

 

[stewpendous1]

I think the IIs would like very strange without NIKE on them. The others can pass, but not these.

 

[lstepcorrect81]

^^ The jumpman actually doesn't look that awkward on the doernbecher II's but still. This is a good question

 

[leogetsitdone]

It says nike, not nike air the fusions 12's and 5's said nike air on them as well. JB is playing games with us.

 

[hugo]

Originally Posted by 3thaman

The best line I hear on this board atleast once a month is that JB has to pay Nike Royalties to use it.

 

[eciaccord]

I don't know, a way for Jordan brand not to anger the collectors. If youre going to retro something, keep it the same. No offense guys.

 

[asilva23]

who knows why jb does the things they do. the whole nike vs. jumpman argument don't matter to me. the og colorway was a must for the rotation!

 

[addicted2fresh]

The IIs are beatiful. Def one of my Favs.