- 5,686
- 529
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2011
hasnt this juror pretty much already admitted that she wasnt lookin at no evidence?
Yeah, or based on a lot of the testimony either...seems like she was in her own world. Her calling Rachel uneducated, etc is comical especially how dumb she sounded...Rachel can speak 3 languages and English isn't her first one. What's b37s excuse for sounding clueless about the trial?
Last edited: